Savanah D Gisriel, Kristle L. Haberichter, Sara Huang, James Z. Huang
{"title":"Flow Cytometry Analysis of Recurrent or Persistent Lymphadenopathy in Patients with Nodular Lymphocyte-Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma","authors":"Savanah D Gisriel, Kristle L. Haberichter, Sara Huang, James Z. Huang","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: We recently examined the utility of flow cytometric analysis in the diagnosis of nodular \nlymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) by examining reactive T-cell features. This study \naims to compare these features in sequential biopsies of persistent or recurrent lymphadenopathy in patients \nwith NLPHL.\nMethods: We reanalysed the histopathology and flow cytometry findings of 9 patients with multiple \nbiopsies for persistent or recurrent lymphadenopathy and either initial or recurrent NLPHL. A flow \ncytometry signature was considered suggestive of NLPHL if ≥12% of T-cells expressed CD57 or ≥3% of \nT-cells co-expressed CD4 and CD8.\nResults: A flow cytometry signature considered suggestive of NLPHL was seen in 18 of 20 specimens. \nBased on histopathology, 11 were diagnosed as NLPHL, 3 were initially underdiagnosed as atypical \nlymphoid proliferation, and 4 were initially incorrectly diagnosed as negative or progressive transformation \nof germinal centers. Flow cytometry showed similar expression patterns of CD57 and CD4/CD8 in T-cells \nbetween initial and subsequent biopsies. The remaining 2 specimens lacked the flow cytometry signature \nsuggestive of NLPHL and were histopathologically diagnosed as reactive hyperplasia.\nConclusion: Flow cytometry analysis based on our criteria is highly sensitive in detecting NLPHL. \nCorrelation with the cytospin cytology may increase the diagnostic specificity. A negative flow essentially \nruled out the possibility of NHLPHL.\n","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: We recently examined the utility of flow cytometric analysis in the diagnosis of nodular
lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) by examining reactive T-cell features. This study
aims to compare these features in sequential biopsies of persistent or recurrent lymphadenopathy in patients
with NLPHL.
Methods: We reanalysed the histopathology and flow cytometry findings of 9 patients with multiple
biopsies for persistent or recurrent lymphadenopathy and either initial or recurrent NLPHL. A flow
cytometry signature was considered suggestive of NLPHL if ≥12% of T-cells expressed CD57 or ≥3% of
T-cells co-expressed CD4 and CD8.
Results: A flow cytometry signature considered suggestive of NLPHL was seen in 18 of 20 specimens.
Based on histopathology, 11 were diagnosed as NLPHL, 3 were initially underdiagnosed as atypical
lymphoid proliferation, and 4 were initially incorrectly diagnosed as negative or progressive transformation
of germinal centers. Flow cytometry showed similar expression patterns of CD57 and CD4/CD8 in T-cells
between initial and subsequent biopsies. The remaining 2 specimens lacked the flow cytometry signature
suggestive of NLPHL and were histopathologically diagnosed as reactive hyperplasia.
Conclusion: Flow cytometry analysis based on our criteria is highly sensitive in detecting NLPHL.
Correlation with the cytospin cytology may increase the diagnostic specificity. A negative flow essentially
ruled out the possibility of NHLPHL.