A concept analysis of 'trial recruitment' using the hybrid model.

Hannah Delaney, Declan Devane, Andrew Hunter, Shaun Treweek, Nicola Mills, Carrol Gamble, Valerie Smith
{"title":"A concept analysis of <i>'trial recruitment'</i> using the hybrid model.","authors":"Hannah Delaney,&nbsp;Declan Devane,&nbsp;Andrew Hunter,&nbsp;Shaun Treweek,&nbsp;Nicola Mills,&nbsp;Carrol Gamble,&nbsp;Valerie Smith","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13173.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background: </b>The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requires trials submitted for publication to be registered before recruitment of the first participant; however, there is ambiguity around the definition of recruitment and in anchoring the trial start date, end date, and recruitment, or as often interchangeably referred to, enrolment, temporally to trial processes. There is potential for variation in how recruitment is reported and understood in trial protocols and trial reports. We report on a concept analysis of 'trial recruitment' and develop an operational definition of 'trial recruitment'. <b>Methods: </b>A concept analysis using the hybrid model. In Phase 1 we examined  randomised and non-randomised trial reports (n=150) published between January 2018 and June 2019 to conceptually explore how recruitment was temporally aligned to the four time-points of screening/eligibility, consent, randomisation and allocation. A preliminary operational definition of 'trial recruitment' was determined. This definition was further explored, refined and finalised in Phase 2 (field work), through an interactive, discussion-focused workshop with trial recruiters and trial participants. <b>Results:</b> Of the 150 trial reports analysed, over half did not identify a clear time point of when recruitment took place and varying terminology is used when reporting on trial recruitment. In Phase 2, the workshop attendees agreed that the proposed definition of 'trial recruitment' offers an acceptable definition that provides a standardised approach of how trial recruitment may be temporally understood as part of overall trial processes. <b>Conclusion:</b> There is ambiguity around temporal descriptions of 'trial recruitment' in health care journals. Informed by the findings of this concept analysis we propose a temporal operational definition of trial recruitment based on i) trial recruitment of an individual or cluster and ii) the trial recruitment period.</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"3 ","pages":"92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021666/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13173.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requires trials submitted for publication to be registered before recruitment of the first participant; however, there is ambiguity around the definition of recruitment and in anchoring the trial start date, end date, and recruitment, or as often interchangeably referred to, enrolment, temporally to trial processes. There is potential for variation in how recruitment is reported and understood in trial protocols and trial reports. We report on a concept analysis of 'trial recruitment' and develop an operational definition of 'trial recruitment'. Methods: A concept analysis using the hybrid model. In Phase 1 we examined  randomised and non-randomised trial reports (n=150) published between January 2018 and June 2019 to conceptually explore how recruitment was temporally aligned to the four time-points of screening/eligibility, consent, randomisation and allocation. A preliminary operational definition of 'trial recruitment' was determined. This definition was further explored, refined and finalised in Phase 2 (field work), through an interactive, discussion-focused workshop with trial recruiters and trial participants. Results: Of the 150 trial reports analysed, over half did not identify a clear time point of when recruitment took place and varying terminology is used when reporting on trial recruitment. In Phase 2, the workshop attendees agreed that the proposed definition of 'trial recruitment' offers an acceptable definition that provides a standardised approach of how trial recruitment may be temporally understood as part of overall trial processes. Conclusion: There is ambiguity around temporal descriptions of 'trial recruitment' in health care journals. Informed by the findings of this concept analysis we propose a temporal operational definition of trial recruitment based on i) trial recruitment of an individual or cluster and ii) the trial recruitment period.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于混合模型的“试用招聘”概念分析。
背景:国际医学杂志编辑委员会(ICMJE)要求提交发表的试验在招募第一名参与者之前进行注册;然而,在招募的定义以及将试验开始日期、结束日期和招募,或经常互换提及的招募,暂时与试验过程挂钩方面存在歧义。在试验方案和试验报告中如何报告和理解招募可能存在差异。我们报告了“试用招聘”的概念分析,并制定了“试用招聘”的操作定义。方法:采用混合模型进行概念分析。在第一阶段,我们研究了2018年1月至2019年6月期间发表的随机和非随机试验报告(n=150),从概念上探讨了招募如何在时间上与筛选/资格、同意、随机化和分配四个时间点保持一致。确定了“试用征聘”的初步业务定义。在第二阶段(实地工作)中,通过与试验招聘人员和试验参与者进行的以讨论为重点的互动研讨会,进一步探索、完善和最终确定了这一定义。结果:在分析的150份试验报告中,超过一半没有确定招募发生的明确时间点,并且在报告试验招募时使用了不同的术语。在第二阶段,研讨会与会者一致认为,拟议的“试验招募”定义提供了一个可接受的定义,该定义提供了一种标准化的方法,说明如何将试验招募暂时理解为整个试验过程的一部分。结论:在卫生保健期刊中对“试验招募”的时间描述存在歧义。根据这一概念分析的结果,我们提出了一个试验招募的时间操作定义,基于i)个人或群集的试验招募和ii)试验招募期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Concept Analysis of Death Attitude Using a Hybrid Model
IF 0 J Korean Soc Nurs EthicsPub Date : 2021-08-30 DOI: 10.51462/jksne.2021.1.2.46
M. Kang, A. Park, Hye Ju Park
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion characteristics measured or reported in randomised trials of intrapartum interventions: A Scoping Review. Protocol for the development of an intervention to improve the use of Point-of-caRE DiagnostICs in the management of respiraTOry tRact infectionS in primary care (the PREDICTORS study). Data sources on COVID-19 infection and vaccination in pregnancy on the island of Ireland: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations for future pandemic preparedness. Characteristics of participants in the first fully online National Diabetes Prevention Programme: A quantitative survey. A scoping review protocol of non-verbal communication utilised in peri-interventive dental and medical procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1