Greater Age-Related Reductions in Central Arterial Compliance in Resistance-Trained Men

M. Miyachi, A. Donato, Kenta Yamamoto, Kouki Takahashi, P. Gates, K. Moreau, Hirofumi Tanaka
{"title":"Greater Age-Related Reductions in Central Arterial Compliance in Resistance-Trained Men","authors":"M. Miyachi, A. Donato, Kenta Yamamoto, Kouki Takahashi, P. Gates, K. Moreau, Hirofumi Tanaka","doi":"10.1097/00005768-200305001-02223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract—Reductions in the compliance of central arteries exert a number of adverse effects on systemic cardiovascular function and disease risk. Using the cross-sectional study design, we determined the relation between chronic resistance training and carotid arterial compliance. A total of 62 healthy normotensive men, 20 to 39 years of age (young) and 40 to 60 years of age (middle-aged), who were either sedentary or resistance-trained, were studied. In both activity groups, carotid arterial compliance (simultaneous ultrasound and applanation tonometry) was lower (P <0.05) in the middle-aged compared with the young men. There was no significant difference between young sedentary and resistance-trained men. In the middle-aged group, carotid arterial compliance in the resistance-trained men was ≈30% lower (P <0.01) than their sedentary peers. Femoral artery compliance and arm pulse wave velocity (measures of peripheral artery stiffness) were not different among any groups. Left ventricular hypertrophy index (echocardiography) was greater (P <0.05) in resistance-trained compared with sedentary men and was associated with carotid arterial compliance (r =−0.35;P <0.01). We concluded that (1) resistance training is associated with the smaller central arterial compliance in healthy middle-aged men; (2) age-related reductions in arterial compliance was greater in resistance-trained men than in sedentary men; and (3) the lower arterial compliance in the resistance-trained men is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy. In marked contrast to the beneficial effect of regular aerobic exercise, the present findings are not consistent with the idea that resistance training exerts beneficial influences on arterial wall buffering functions.","PeriodicalId":13233,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"525 ","pages":"130-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"225","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200305001-02223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 225

Abstract

Abstract—Reductions in the compliance of central arteries exert a number of adverse effects on systemic cardiovascular function and disease risk. Using the cross-sectional study design, we determined the relation between chronic resistance training and carotid arterial compliance. A total of 62 healthy normotensive men, 20 to 39 years of age (young) and 40 to 60 years of age (middle-aged), who were either sedentary or resistance-trained, were studied. In both activity groups, carotid arterial compliance (simultaneous ultrasound and applanation tonometry) was lower (P <0.05) in the middle-aged compared with the young men. There was no significant difference between young sedentary and resistance-trained men. In the middle-aged group, carotid arterial compliance in the resistance-trained men was ≈30% lower (P <0.01) than their sedentary peers. Femoral artery compliance and arm pulse wave velocity (measures of peripheral artery stiffness) were not different among any groups. Left ventricular hypertrophy index (echocardiography) was greater (P <0.05) in resistance-trained compared with sedentary men and was associated with carotid arterial compliance (r =−0.35;P <0.01). We concluded that (1) resistance training is associated with the smaller central arterial compliance in healthy middle-aged men; (2) age-related reductions in arterial compliance was greater in resistance-trained men than in sedentary men; and (3) the lower arterial compliance in the resistance-trained men is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy. In marked contrast to the beneficial effect of regular aerobic exercise, the present findings are not consistent with the idea that resistance training exerts beneficial influences on arterial wall buffering functions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗阻训练男性中枢性动脉顺应性随年龄增加而降低
摘要:中心动脉顺应性的降低对全身心血管功能和疾病风险有许多不利影响。采用横断面研究设计,我们确定了慢性阻力训练与颈动脉顺应性之间的关系。共有62名健康的血压正常的男性,年龄在20至39岁(年轻)和40至60岁(中年),他们要么久坐不动,要么接受阻力训练。在两个活动组中,中年男性颈动脉顺应性(同时超声和平压血压计)低于年轻男性(P <0.05)。久坐不动的年轻男性和阻力训练的年轻男性之间没有显著差异。在中年组中,阻力训练的男性颈动脉顺应性比久坐的男性低30% (P <0.01)。股动脉顺应性和手臂脉搏波速度(测量外周动脉硬度)在各组之间没有差异。与久坐不动的男性相比,阻力训练的左心室肥厚指数(超声心动图)更高(P <0.05),且与颈动脉顺应性相关(r = - 0.35;P <0.01)。我们得出结论:(1)抗阻训练与健康中年男性中心动脉顺应性降低有关;(2)与年龄相关的动脉顺应性下降,阻力训练的男性比久坐的男性更大;(3)抗阻训练男性的下动脉顺应性与左心室肥厚有关。与常规有氧运动的有益作用形成鲜明对比的是,目前的研究结果与阻力训练对动脉壁缓冲功能有有益影响的观点并不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Greater Age-Related Reductions in Central Arterial Compliance in Resistance-Trained Men Drug Effects on Aldosterone/Plasma Renin Activity Ratio in Primary Aldosteronism Decrease in Renal Medullary Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase of Fructose-Fed, Salt-Sensitive Hypertensive Rats High Rate of Ventricular Septal Defects in WKY Rats ETB Receptor in Renal Medulla Is Enhanced by Local Sodium During Low Salt Intake
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1