Self Versus Delegated Distribution in Digital Platforms: The Case of Amazon

Giuseppe D’Amico, R. Flores-Fillol, B. Theilen
{"title":"Self Versus Delegated Distribution in Digital Platforms: The Case of Amazon","authors":"Giuseppe D’Amico, R. Flores-Fillol, B. Theilen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3892869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the e-book market, the self-publishing business model that has been boosted by digitalization has become increasingly important. Although self-publishing circumvents distribution intermediaries, consequently yielding unambiguous advantages both for authors and consumers, it also raises some concerns related to Amazon's accrued market dominance. This paper analyzes the pros and the cons of this emerging business by proposing a platform model where consumers are ex ante uncertain about their true preferences on the content, and each content provider sells a differentiated product variety and determines its price around a Salop circle under two structures: self-distribution and delegated distribution. Our results suggest that: i) self-publishing can result in higher e-book prices for consumers under certain circumstances; ii) publishing companies could be driven out of the e-book market by Amazon in the segment of non-specialized books or novels written by emerging authors; however iii) Amazon's dominance over traditional publishing companies should not cause damage to final consumers and, consequently, does not call for regulatory action.","PeriodicalId":11797,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Regulation (IO) (Topic)","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Regulation (IO) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3892869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the e-book market, the self-publishing business model that has been boosted by digitalization has become increasingly important. Although self-publishing circumvents distribution intermediaries, consequently yielding unambiguous advantages both for authors and consumers, it also raises some concerns related to Amazon's accrued market dominance. This paper analyzes the pros and the cons of this emerging business by proposing a platform model where consumers are ex ante uncertain about their true preferences on the content, and each content provider sells a differentiated product variety and determines its price around a Salop circle under two structures: self-distribution and delegated distribution. Our results suggest that: i) self-publishing can result in higher e-book prices for consumers under certain circumstances; ii) publishing companies could be driven out of the e-book market by Amazon in the segment of non-specialized books or novels written by emerging authors; however iii) Amazon's dominance over traditional publishing companies should not cause damage to final consumers and, consequently, does not call for regulatory action.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字平台上的自我分销与委托分销:亚马逊的案例
在电子书市场中,由数字化推动的自助出版商业模式变得越来越重要。尽管自助出版绕过了分销中介,从而为作者和消费者带来了明确的优势,但它也引发了一些与亚马逊累积的市场主导地位有关的担忧。本文通过提出一种平台模式来分析这一新兴业务的利弊,在这种模式下,消费者事先不确定自己对内容的真实偏好,每个内容提供商在自我分销和委托分销两种结构下,围绕Salop圈销售差异化的产品品种并确定其价格。我们的研究结果表明:1)在某些情况下,自助出版会导致消费者支付更高的电子书价格;ii)出版公司可能会被亚马逊赶出电子书市场,在新兴作家撰写的非专业书籍或小说领域;iii)亚马逊对传统出版公司的主导地位不应该对最终消费者造成损害,因此不需要采取监管行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sound GUPPI Safe Harbor: A Calibrated Unilateral Effects Screen for Horizontal Mergers with Differentiated Products Consolidation on Aisle Five: Effects of Mergers in Consumer Packaged Goods Optimal Exit Policy with Uncertain Demand Friends in High Places: Demand Spillovers and Competition on Digital Platforms The Ambiguous Competitive Effects of Passive Partial Forward Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1