Efficacy and Safety of Memantine in Patients With Mild to Moderate Vascular Dementia: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial (MMM 300)

J. Orgogozo, A. Rigaud, A. Stöffler, H. Möbius, F. Forette
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Memantine in Patients With Mild to Moderate Vascular Dementia: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial (MMM 300)","authors":"J. Orgogozo, A. Rigaud, A. Stöffler, H. Möbius, F. Forette","doi":"10.1161/01.STR.0000020094.08790.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose— Based on the hypothesis of glutamate-induced neurotoxicity (excitotoxicity) in cerebral ischemia, this study examined the efficacy and tolerability of memantine, an uncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist, in the treatment of mild to moderate vascular dementia. Methods— In this multicenter, 28-week trial carried out in France, 321 patients received 10 mg/d memantine or placebo twice a day; 288 patients were valid for intent-to-treat analysis. Patients had to meet the criteria for probable vascular dementia and have a Mini-Mental State (MMSE) score between 12 and 20 at inclusion. The 2 primary end points were the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog) and the global Clinician’s Interview Based Impression of Change (CIBIC-plus). Results— After 28 weeks, the mean ADAS-cog scores were significantly improved relative to placebo. In the intention-to-treat population, the memantine group mean score had gained an average of 0.4 points, whereas the placebo group mean score had declined by 1.6 points, ie, a difference of 2.0 points (95% confidence interval, 0.49 to 3.60). The response rate for CIBIC-plus, defined as improved or stable, was 60% with memantine compared with 52% with placebo (P =0.227, intention to treat). Among the secondary efficacy parameters, which were analyzed in the per-protocol subset, MMSE was significantly improved with memantine compared with deterioration with placebo (P =0.003). The Gottfries-Brane-Steen Scale intellectual function subscore and the Nurses’ Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients disturbing behavior dimension also showed differences in favor of memantine (P =0.04 and P =0.07, respectively). Memantine was well tolerated with a frequency of adverse events comparable to placebo. Conclusions— In patients with mild to moderate vascular dementia, memantine 20 mg/d improved cognition consistently across different cognitive scales, with at least no deterioration in global functioning and behavior. It was devoid of concerning side effects.","PeriodicalId":22274,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"12 4","pages":"1834-1839"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"458","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000020094.08790.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 458

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Based on the hypothesis of glutamate-induced neurotoxicity (excitotoxicity) in cerebral ischemia, this study examined the efficacy and tolerability of memantine, an uncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist, in the treatment of mild to moderate vascular dementia. Methods— In this multicenter, 28-week trial carried out in France, 321 patients received 10 mg/d memantine or placebo twice a day; 288 patients were valid for intent-to-treat analysis. Patients had to meet the criteria for probable vascular dementia and have a Mini-Mental State (MMSE) score between 12 and 20 at inclusion. The 2 primary end points were the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog) and the global Clinician’s Interview Based Impression of Change (CIBIC-plus). Results— After 28 weeks, the mean ADAS-cog scores were significantly improved relative to placebo. In the intention-to-treat population, the memantine group mean score had gained an average of 0.4 points, whereas the placebo group mean score had declined by 1.6 points, ie, a difference of 2.0 points (95% confidence interval, 0.49 to 3.60). The response rate for CIBIC-plus, defined as improved or stable, was 60% with memantine compared with 52% with placebo (P =0.227, intention to treat). Among the secondary efficacy parameters, which were analyzed in the per-protocol subset, MMSE was significantly improved with memantine compared with deterioration with placebo (P =0.003). The Gottfries-Brane-Steen Scale intellectual function subscore and the Nurses’ Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients disturbing behavior dimension also showed differences in favor of memantine (P =0.04 and P =0.07, respectively). Memantine was well tolerated with a frequency of adverse events comparable to placebo. Conclusions— In patients with mild to moderate vascular dementia, memantine 20 mg/d improved cognition consistently across different cognitive scales, with at least no deterioration in global functioning and behavior. It was devoid of concerning side effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美金刚在轻中度血管性痴呆患者中的疗效和安全性:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验(MMM 300)
背景和目的:基于脑缺血中谷氨酸诱导的神经毒性(兴奋性毒性)的假设,本研究考察了美金刚(一种非竞争性n -甲基-d-天冬氨酸拮抗剂)治疗轻中度血管性痴呆的疗效和耐受性。方法:在法国进行的这项为期28周的多中心试验中,321名患者每天两次接受10mg /d美金刚或安慰剂治疗;288例患者对意向治疗分析有效。患者必须符合可能的血管性痴呆的标准,并且在纳入时具有最小精神状态(MMSE)评分在12到20之间。两个主要终点是阿尔茨海默病评估量表(ADAS-cog)的认知子量表和全球临床医生访谈基础变化印象量表(CIBIC-plus)。结果:28周后,ADAS-cog平均评分较安慰剂显著改善。在意向治疗人群中,美金刚组平均得分平均提高了0.4分,而安慰剂组平均得分下降了1.6分,即差异为2.0分(95%置信区间,0.49至3.60)。对于CIBIC-plus的缓解率,定义为改善或稳定,美金刚组为60%,安慰剂组为52% (P =0.227,治疗意向)。在每个方案子集中分析的次要疗效参数中,与安慰剂相比,美金刚组的MMSE显著改善(P =0.003)。在Gottfries-Brane-Steen量表智力功能分项得分和老年患者护士观察量表干扰行为维度上,均存在支持美金刚的差异(P =0.04和P =0.07)。美金刚耐受性良好,不良事件发生频率与安慰剂相当。结论:在轻度至中度血管性痴呆患者中,美金刚20mg /d在不同的认知尺度上持续改善认知,至少没有整体功能和行为的恶化。它没有令人担忧的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A Common Agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association Recurrent Stroke in Patients With Symptomatic Carotid Artery Occlusion Is Associated With High-Volume Flow to the Brain and Increased Collateral Circulation Risk of Stroke Associated With Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A Nested Case-Control Study Imaging-Based Decision Making in Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: Present Status Risk Factors for Falling in Home-Dwelling Older Women With Stroke: The Women’s Health and Aging Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1