Adaptation of cerebral pressure-velocity hemodynamic changes of neurovascular coupling to orthostatic challenge

Pedro Castro , Rosa Santos , João Freitas , Bernhard Rosengarten , Ronney Panerai , Elsa Azevedo
{"title":"Adaptation of cerebral pressure-velocity hemodynamic changes of neurovascular coupling to orthostatic challenge","authors":"Pedro Castro ,&nbsp;Rosa Santos ,&nbsp;João Freitas ,&nbsp;Bernhard Rosengarten ,&nbsp;Ronney Panerai ,&nbsp;Elsa Azevedo","doi":"10.1016/j.permed.2012.02.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Neurovascular coupling (NVC), analysed by a control system approach, was shown to be unaffected by orthostatic challenge, but data is lacking regarding the mechanism of this interplay and the behaviour of other cerebrovascular reactivity parameters. We investigated the changes in different pressure–velocity models during functional transcranial Doppler (TCD), under different orthostatic conditions.</p><p>Thirteen healthy volunteers performed a reading test stimulation task in sitting, supine and head-up tilt (HUT) positions. CBF velocity was monitored with TCD in the posterior cerebral artery, and blood pressure was monitored with Finapres. Cerebrovascular resistance index (CVRi) was compared to a two-parameter model including resistance-area product (RAP) and critical closing pressure (CrCP), in the maximal and in the stable phases of flow response to visual stimulation.</p><p>All cerebrovascular resistance parameters decreased with visual stimulation but the magnitude of their variation in each orthostatic condition was not similar. From supine to HUT, CrCP variation decreased (both maximal and stable phase <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). CVRi variation increased from sitting to HUT positions (maximal <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.039; stable phase <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.033). RAP variation to visual stimulation did not change between the three positions (maximal <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.077; stable phase <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.188).</p><p>A 2-parameter model of vascular resistance provided better discrimination for the effects of posture on NVC as shown by the adaptive changes in CrCP with orthostatic challenge, in comparison with the classical use of CVRi. These findings suggest that although NVC seemed unaffected by orthostatic challenge, more complex vasoregulative mechanisms are activated in different orthostatic conditions that could potentially be of diagnostic or prognostic value.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101010,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 290-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.permed.2012.02.052","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211968X12000599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Neurovascular coupling (NVC), analysed by a control system approach, was shown to be unaffected by orthostatic challenge, but data is lacking regarding the mechanism of this interplay and the behaviour of other cerebrovascular reactivity parameters. We investigated the changes in different pressure–velocity models during functional transcranial Doppler (TCD), under different orthostatic conditions.

Thirteen healthy volunteers performed a reading test stimulation task in sitting, supine and head-up tilt (HUT) positions. CBF velocity was monitored with TCD in the posterior cerebral artery, and blood pressure was monitored with Finapres. Cerebrovascular resistance index (CVRi) was compared to a two-parameter model including resistance-area product (RAP) and critical closing pressure (CrCP), in the maximal and in the stable phases of flow response to visual stimulation.

All cerebrovascular resistance parameters decreased with visual stimulation but the magnitude of their variation in each orthostatic condition was not similar. From supine to HUT, CrCP variation decreased (both maximal and stable phase p = 0.001). CVRi variation increased from sitting to HUT positions (maximal p = 0.039; stable phase p = 0.033). RAP variation to visual stimulation did not change between the three positions (maximal p = 0.077; stable phase p = 0.188).

A 2-parameter model of vascular resistance provided better discrimination for the effects of posture on NVC as shown by the adaptive changes in CrCP with orthostatic challenge, in comparison with the classical use of CVRi. These findings suggest that although NVC seemed unaffected by orthostatic challenge, more complex vasoregulative mechanisms are activated in different orthostatic conditions that could potentially be of diagnostic or prognostic value.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经血管耦合的脑压力-速度血流动力学变化对直立性挑战的适应
通过控制系统方法分析的神经血管耦合(NVC)显示不受直立挑战的影响,但缺乏关于这种相互作用机制和其他脑血管反应性参数行为的数据。我们研究了不同直立状态下功能性经颅多普勒(TCD)中不同压力-速度模型的变化。13名健康志愿者分别以坐位、仰卧位和头向上倾斜(HUT)的姿势进行阅读测试刺激任务。用脑后动脉TCD监测脑血流速度,用Finapres监测血压。在视觉刺激下血流反应的最大和稳定阶段,将脑血管阻力指数(CVRi)与阻力面积积(RAP)和临界闭合压力(CrCP)两参数模型进行比较。所有脑血管阻力参数均随视觉刺激而降低,但其在不同立位状态下的变化幅度不相同。从仰卧位到HUT, CrCP变化减小(最大期和稳定期p = 0.001)。从坐姿到HUT位置CVRi变异增加(最大p = 0.039;稳定相p = 0.033)。视觉刺激下的RAP变化在三个位置之间没有变化(最大p = 0.077;稳定相p = 0.188)。与传统的CVRi相比,血管阻力的2参数模型可以更好地区分姿势对NVC的影响,从CrCP在直立性挑战下的适应性变化中可以看出。这些发现表明,尽管NVC似乎不受直立挑战的影响,但在不同的直立状态下,更复杂的血管调节机制被激活,这可能具有潜在的诊断或预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neue Einsichten in die Toxizität und die Speziation von Mangan Anwendung der Platinspeziation zum Nachweis einer Aktivierung oder Inhibierung von Pt enthaltenden Krebsmedikamenten Über Mineralstoffe und Spurenelemente Die Rolle von Mangan bei neurodegenerativen Erkrankungen Risiken und Nutzen der Eisensupplementation: Empfehlungen zur Eisenaufnahme kritisch betrachtet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1