The day-to-day reliability of residual force enhancement during voluntary and electrically stimulated contractions.

Abstract

Residual force enhancement (rFE) is characterized by increased steady-state isometric force following active muscle lengthening compared with a fixed-end isometric contraction at the same muscle length and level of neuromuscular activation. Many studies have characterized rFE in humans; however, the day-to-day reliability of rFE is unclear. We aimed to examine day-to-day reliability of rFE across various contraction types in the dorsiflexors in males and females. Twenty-five recreationally active young adults completed two visits, 1 week apart. Following determination of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) strength, rFE was assessed during maximal voluntary effort, 20% MVC electrically stimulated, and 20% MVC torque-matching conditions. Each rFE condition was completed at two joint excursions: 0°-20° plantar flexion (PF) and 0°-40° PF. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed relative reliability and typical error of measurement (TEM), and the correlation variability of TEM (CV_TEM) assessed absolute reliability. Electrically stimulated contractions demonstrated the highest reliability at 40° PF (ICC: 0.9; CV_TEM: 22.8%) and 20° PF (ICC: 0.8; CV_TEM: 34.3%), followed by maximal voluntary contractions at 40° PF (ICC: 0.7; CV_TEM: 55.1%) and 20° PF (ICC: 0.1; CV_TEM: 81.1%). The torque-matching trials showed poor reliability for 20° and 40° PF (ICC: -0.1 to 0.3; CV_TEM: 118.1%-155.2%). Our results demonstrate higher reliability of rFE when stretching to the descending limb of the torque-angle relationship compared with the plateau region, and in electrically stimulated compared with voluntary contractions in the dorsiflexors for both males and females.