THE EVIDENCE FROM PARASITE RELATIONSHIPS FOR THE EVOLUTIONARY STATUS OF XENOPUS (ANURA PIPIDAE)

R. Tinsley
{"title":"THE EVIDENCE FROM PARASITE RELATIONSHIPS FOR THE EVOLUTIONARY STATUS OF XENOPUS (ANURA PIPIDAE)","authors":"R. Tinsley","doi":"10.1080/03749444.1981.10736643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY The Pipidae are generally considered a relatively early offshoot in anuran evolution but a recent review, based mainly on nerve ganglia characteristics, has concluded that the group is not primitive by any criteria. Consideration of parasite phylogenetic relationships provides another, independent, view of pipid status. The parasite fauna of Xenopus is highly distinctive and displays a mixture of primitive and very specialised characters. Detailed analysis of one group— the monogeneans— suggests that Protopolystoma, infecting Xenopus, is primitive and very distant with respect to polystomatids in advanced anurans including ranids and bufonids. The combined evidence of a range of invertebrate groups indicates that parasite affinities are best interpreted as a product of prolonged phylogenetic and ecological isolation of the host. It is concluded that pipids are archaic and cannot be aligned with advanced families.","PeriodicalId":19014,"journal":{"name":"Monitore Zoologico Italiano-Italian Journal of Zoology","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monitore Zoologico Italiano-Italian Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03749444.1981.10736643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

SUMMARY The Pipidae are generally considered a relatively early offshoot in anuran evolution but a recent review, based mainly on nerve ganglia characteristics, has concluded that the group is not primitive by any criteria. Consideration of parasite phylogenetic relationships provides another, independent, view of pipid status. The parasite fauna of Xenopus is highly distinctive and displays a mixture of primitive and very specialised characters. Detailed analysis of one group— the monogeneans— suggests that Protopolystoma, infecting Xenopus, is primitive and very distant with respect to polystomatids in advanced anurans including ranids and bufonids. The combined evidence of a range of invertebrate groups indicates that parasite affinities are best interpreted as a product of prolonged phylogenetic and ecological isolation of the host. It is concluded that pipids are archaic and cannot be aligned with advanced families.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从寄生关系看爪蟾的进化状态
Pipidae通常被认为是无尾猿进化的一个相对较早的分支,但最近一项主要基于神经节特征的综述得出结论,无论以何种标准衡量,该类群都不是原始的。考虑寄生虫的系统发育关系提供了另一种独立的观点。非洲爪蟾的寄生动物群非常独特,显示出原始和非常特殊的特征的混合。对一组单系动物的详细分析表明,感染非洲爪蟾的原多口瘤是原始的,与包括蜥蜴和蟾类在内的高级无尾动物的多口瘤差别很大。一系列无脊椎动物群体的综合证据表明,寄生虫的亲缘关系最好被解释为宿主长期系统发育和生态隔离的产物。结论是,脂类是古老的,不能与先进的家族对齐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AIDE DE L'HELMINTHOLOGIE À LA CONNAISSANCE DES AMPHIBIENS: PUBBLICAZIONI DEL CENTRO DI STUDIO PER LA FAUNISTICA ED ECOLOGIA TROPICALI DEL C.N.R.: CCXX ON THE PRESENCE OF TWO COXAL SENSE ORGANS IN PTERYGOTA INSECTS RE-DESCRIPTION OF THE EXTERNAL MORPHOLOGY OF SOMNIOSUS ROSTRATUS (RISSO, 1826), WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ITS SQUAMATION AND CUTANEOUS SENSORY ORGANS, AND ASPECTS OF THEIR FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY (PISCES SELACHII SQUALIDAE) EXAMPLES OF THE CLOSE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MODE OF TRANSMISSION OF SOME PARASITES AND THE NICHE OF THE HOST AMPHIBIAN EFFECT OF METHYLTESTOSTERONE ON THE FORMATION OF THE CANESTRINI'S ORGAN IN FEMALE COBITIS TAENIA BILINEATA CANESTRINI (COBITIDAE OSTEICHTHYES)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1