Weed dynamics and productivity of dry direct seeded rice in relation to tillage and weed management practices

D. Marasini, S. Sah, S. Marahatta, S. Dhakal
{"title":"Weed dynamics and productivity of dry direct seeded rice in relation to tillage and weed management practices","authors":"D. Marasini, S. Sah, S. Marahatta, S. Dhakal","doi":"10.3126/jafu.v4i1.47054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weed is one of the major constraints for success of dry direct seeded rice (DDSR) technology. The productivity, weed density and weed dry weight of DDSR is influenced by weed management practices. A field experiment was done to evaluate tillage methods and weed management practices on weed dynamics and yield of DDSR using split plot design; each treatment replicated thrice. The treatment consisted of two tillage methods in the main plots, and eight weed management practices in the sub-plots. Gorakhnath-509 was the variety of rice used. Weed flora observed in the experiment comprised of 25 weed species, belonging to 12 families. Among them 12 were broadleaf weed, belonging to 10 families; 8 were grasses, belonging to Poaceae family, and the rest 5 were sedges, belonging to Cyperaceae family. Tillage methods did not influence weed density and weed dry weight in DDSR, but weed management practices reduced weed density and dry weight at all dates of observation compared to weedy check. All the weed management practices significantly improved the grain yield of DDSR in both tillage methods. Treatments with higher grain yield of DDSR were, use of pendimethalin followed by hand weeding (3,742 kg ha-1); pendimethalin followed by bispyribac-Na (3,552 kg ha-1), and pendimethalin followed by tank mixture application of bispyribac-Na and ethoxysulfuron(3,638 kg ha-1), but were statistically similar (p>0.05). Results thus supports the fact that application of popular pre-emergence herbicide- pendimethalin followed by manual weeding, or post-emergence herbicide, such as Bispyribac-Na, or tank mixture of post emergence herbicides bispyribac-Na and Ethoxysulfuron could be the most effective weed management practices in both tillage method of rice cultivation.","PeriodicalId":15865,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University","volume":"47 11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jafu.v4i1.47054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Weed is one of the major constraints for success of dry direct seeded rice (DDSR) technology. The productivity, weed density and weed dry weight of DDSR is influenced by weed management practices. A field experiment was done to evaluate tillage methods and weed management practices on weed dynamics and yield of DDSR using split plot design; each treatment replicated thrice. The treatment consisted of two tillage methods in the main plots, and eight weed management practices in the sub-plots. Gorakhnath-509 was the variety of rice used. Weed flora observed in the experiment comprised of 25 weed species, belonging to 12 families. Among them 12 were broadleaf weed, belonging to 10 families; 8 were grasses, belonging to Poaceae family, and the rest 5 were sedges, belonging to Cyperaceae family. Tillage methods did not influence weed density and weed dry weight in DDSR, but weed management practices reduced weed density and dry weight at all dates of observation compared to weedy check. All the weed management practices significantly improved the grain yield of DDSR in both tillage methods. Treatments with higher grain yield of DDSR were, use of pendimethalin followed by hand weeding (3,742 kg ha-1); pendimethalin followed by bispyribac-Na (3,552 kg ha-1), and pendimethalin followed by tank mixture application of bispyribac-Na and ethoxysulfuron(3,638 kg ha-1), but were statistically similar (p>0.05). Results thus supports the fact that application of popular pre-emergence herbicide- pendimethalin followed by manual weeding, or post-emergence herbicide, such as Bispyribac-Na, or tank mixture of post emergence herbicides bispyribac-Na and Ethoxysulfuron could be the most effective weed management practices in both tillage method of rice cultivation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旱作直接播种水稻的杂草动态和生产力与耕作和杂草管理措施的关系
杂草是制约旱作直接播种稻技术成功的主要因素之一。稻田生产力、杂草密度和干重受杂草管理措施的影响。采用分块设计,通过田间试验,评价了不同耕作方式和杂草管理方式对旱地旱地杂草动态和产量的影响;每个处理重复三次。主样地采用2种耕作方式,次样地采用8种杂草管理方式。Gorakhnath-509是使用的水稻品种。实验中观察到的杂草区系包括25种杂草,隶属于12科。其中阔叶杂草12种,隶属于10科;禾本科8株,属于禾本科科;莎草类5株,属于莎草科。耕作方式对DDSR的杂草密度和干重没有影响,但与杂草检查相比,杂草管理措施在所有观测日期都降低了杂草密度和干重。在两种耕作方式下,所有杂草管理措施均显著提高了DDSR的产量。单株产量较高的处理为:喷施二甲醚后手除草(3,742 kg hm -1);喷淋后喷淋双嘧菌菌na (3552 kg ha-1),喷淋后喷淋双嘧菌菌na与乙氧基磺隆(3638 kg ha-1),但差异有统计学意义(p>0.05)。结果表明,在两种耕作方法中,使用流行的出苗期除草剂二甲甲基灵后人工除草,或出苗期除草剂双嘧菌酯- na,或出苗期除草剂双嘧菌酯- na与乙氧基磺隆混合施用是最有效的杂草管理措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of crop and livestock protection methods against wildlife damage: A case from Chitwan National Park, Nepal Laboratory bioassay of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) larva using various insecticides Synthesis of nanoparticles of Poly (ethyleneimine) and their characterization by transmission electron microscopy, thin layer chromatography, and infrared spectroscopy Effect of foliar application of different nutrients on growth, yield, and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Sankhu, Kathmandu, Nepal Aphid Pest Management in Sweet Pepper Field with Rapeseed as a Companion Crop
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1