Industry First Subsea Reentry Multilateral Wells: Case Study

S. Ragaglia, Antonio Carotenuto, L. Napoleone, Guerino De Dominicis, Sergey Sakharov, A. Latypov, R. Newman, Carlos Guevara, Hakim Rachi, Kjell Revheim
{"title":"Industry First Subsea Reentry Multilateral Wells: Case Study","authors":"S. Ragaglia, Antonio Carotenuto, L. Napoleone, Guerino De Dominicis, Sergey Sakharov, A. Latypov, R. Newman, Carlos Guevara, Hakim Rachi, Kjell Revheim","doi":"10.2118/207960-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n To rapidly increase production from the Goliat Field without adding costly subsea equipment and infrastructure or mobilizing a high-end subsea construction vessel, an operator transformed two single-bore subsea wells into multilateral producers with independently controlled branches.\n A multidisciplinary team was assigned to perform a feasibility study for the introduction of multilateral wells. Work started with a reservoir geomechanics/wellbore stability review, based on which well construction/completion basis of design was made. The design and operations sequence were analyzed by a well engineering team. As a result, the main risks, uncertainties, and assumptions were clarified. Two candidate wells were identified, and then a multidisciplinary team was assigned to manage the project, finalize design, initiate procurement, and write procedures. Workshop preparation was closely monitored and reported on a weekly basis. The onshore team closely followed up and supported operational execution.\n The new laterals were added to the existing wells, and multilateral junctions were installed and tested. An intelligent completion was installed, and independent branch production started. In addition, the estimated reduction in generation of CO2 is estimated to be between 10 to 20 thousand metric tons per well as compared with drilling two new subsea wells and installing the associated infrastructure.\n The technology enables an exploration and production (E&P) company to introduce subsea reentry multilateral technology to increase production while minimizing costs. The process includes well candidate identification, planning, and execution. This practical example can be used for future reference by drilling and production-focused petroleum industry professionals to better understand the benefits and limitations of existing technologies.","PeriodicalId":10981,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","volume":"108 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207960-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To rapidly increase production from the Goliat Field without adding costly subsea equipment and infrastructure or mobilizing a high-end subsea construction vessel, an operator transformed two single-bore subsea wells into multilateral producers with independently controlled branches. A multidisciplinary team was assigned to perform a feasibility study for the introduction of multilateral wells. Work started with a reservoir geomechanics/wellbore stability review, based on which well construction/completion basis of design was made. The design and operations sequence were analyzed by a well engineering team. As a result, the main risks, uncertainties, and assumptions were clarified. Two candidate wells were identified, and then a multidisciplinary team was assigned to manage the project, finalize design, initiate procurement, and write procedures. Workshop preparation was closely monitored and reported on a weekly basis. The onshore team closely followed up and supported operational execution. The new laterals were added to the existing wells, and multilateral junctions were installed and tested. An intelligent completion was installed, and independent branch production started. In addition, the estimated reduction in generation of CO2 is estimated to be between 10 to 20 thousand metric tons per well as compared with drilling two new subsea wells and installing the associated infrastructure. The technology enables an exploration and production (E&P) company to introduce subsea reentry multilateral technology to increase production while minimizing costs. The process includes well candidate identification, planning, and execution. This practical example can be used for future reference by drilling and production-focused petroleum industry professionals to better understand the benefits and limitations of existing technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行业首口水下多分支井:案例研究
为了在不增加昂贵的海底设备和基础设施或调动高端海底施工船的情况下快速提高Goliat油田的产量,一家运营商将两口单井改造成具有独立控制分支的多井生产设备。一个多学科团队被指派进行多分支井的可行性研究。首先进行了油藏地质力学/井筒稳定性评估,并在此基础上制定了建井/完井设计依据。工程团队对设计和作业顺序进行了分析。因此,明确了主要风险、不确定性和假设。确定了两口候选井,然后分配了一个多学科团队来管理项目,完成设计,启动采购和编写程序。车间的准备工作被密切监控并每周报告。陆上团队密切跟踪并支持作业执行。新的分支井被添加到现有井中,并安装和测试了分支接头。安装智能完井,开始独立分支生产。此外,与钻两口新海底井并安装相关基础设施相比,预计每口井减少的二氧化碳排放量将在1万至2万吨之间。该技术使勘探和生产(E&P)公司能够引入海底再入多边技术,以提高产量,同时最大限度地降低成本。该过程包括候选井的识别、计划和执行。这个实际的例子可以为未来专注于钻井和生产的石油行业专业人员提供参考,以更好地了解现有技术的优点和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wellbore Cleanness Under Total Losses in Horizontal Wells: The Field Study Integrating Rock Typing Methods Including Empirical, Deterministic, Statistical, Probabilistic, Predictive Techniques and New Applications for Practical Reservoir Characterization Real Time Implementation of ESP Predictive Analytics - Towards Value Realization from Data Science The Use of 5G Technologies in the Digital Transformation of the Oil/Gas Industry Recent Case Histories of Multilateral Systems Enabling Thru Tubing Intervention in the Middle East
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1