The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US.

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s41542-023-00143-1
Mindy E Bergman, Vanessa A Gaskins, Tammy Allen, Ho Kwan Cheung, Mikki Hebl, Eden B King, Robert R Sinclair, Rose L Siuta, Corrine Wolfe, Alexandra I Zelin
{"title":"The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US.","authors":"Mindy E Bergman, Vanessa A Gaskins, Tammy Allen, Ho Kwan Cheung, Mikki Hebl, Eden B King, Robert R Sinclair, Rose L Siuta, Corrine Wolfe, Alexandra I Zelin","doi":"10.1007/s41542-023-00143-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to abortion care has a profound impact on women's ability to participate in the workforce. In the US, restrictions on abortion care have waxed and waned over the years, including periods when abortion was broadly permitted across the nation for most pregnant people for a substantial proportion of pregnancy and times when restrictions varied across states, including states where abortion is banned for nearly all reasons. Additionally, access to abortion care has always been a reproductive justice issue, with some people more able to access this care than others even when it is structurally available. In June 2022, the US Supreme Court handed down the <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</i>, returning to states the ability to determine restrictions on abortion, including near-total bans on abortion. In this anthology, ten experts share their perspectives on what the Dobbs decision means for the future, how it will exacerbate existing, well-researched issues, and likely also create new challenges needing investigation. Some contributions are focused on research directions, some focus on implications for organizations, and most include both. All contributions share relevant occupational health literature and describe the effects of the Dobbs decision in context.</p>","PeriodicalId":29938,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Health Science","volume":"7 1","pages":"1-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9940085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-023-00143-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to abortion care has a profound impact on women's ability to participate in the workforce. In the US, restrictions on abortion care have waxed and waned over the years, including periods when abortion was broadly permitted across the nation for most pregnant people for a substantial proportion of pregnancy and times when restrictions varied across states, including states where abortion is banned for nearly all reasons. Additionally, access to abortion care has always been a reproductive justice issue, with some people more able to access this care than others even when it is structurally available. In June 2022, the US Supreme Court handed down the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, returning to states the ability to determine restrictions on abortion, including near-total bans on abortion. In this anthology, ten experts share their perspectives on what the Dobbs decision means for the future, how it will exacerbate existing, well-researched issues, and likely also create new challenges needing investigation. Some contributions are focused on research directions, some focus on implications for organizations, and most include both. All contributions share relevant occupational health literature and describe the effects of the Dobbs decision in context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多布斯决定与美国职业健康的未来。
获得堕胎护理对妇女参加工作的能力有着深远的影响。在美国,多年来对堕胎护理的限制时多时少,其中包括在全国范围内广泛允许大多数孕妇在相当大比例的孕期内进行堕胎的时期,以及各州限制不同的时期,包括几乎所有原因都禁止堕胎的州。此外,获得堕胎护理一直是一个生殖公正问题,即使在结构性提供堕胎护理的情况下,一些人也比其他人更有能力获得这种护理。2022 年 6 月,美国最高法院颁布了《多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案》,将决定堕胎限制(包括几乎完全禁止堕胎)的权力交还给了各州。在这本文集中,十位专家分享了他们对多布斯案判决对未来的意义的看法,以及该判决将如何加剧现有的、经过充分研究的问题,并可能带来需要调查的新挑战。有些观点侧重于研究方向,有些观点侧重于对组织的影响,而大多数观点则两者兼而有之。所有文章都分享了相关的职业健康文献,并结合背景描述了多布斯决定的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.70%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Workplace Substance Use Programs, Policies, and Practices on Current Substance Use Among A National Sample of Low-Income Workers: Differences by Race/Ethnicity and Education Level An Evaluation of Indoor Sex Workers’ Psychosocial Occupational Health and Safety in Metro Vancouver, Canada Office Openess Affects Stress Regulation and Teamwork: A Neurophysiological Field Study Identifying Different Patterns of Citizenship Motives: A Latent Profile Analysis Methodological and Demographic Variation in Estimates of Economic Dependence Across Two Types of Gig Work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1