Are floods getting worse in the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna basins?

M. Monirul Qader Mirza , R.A. Warrick , N.J. Ericksen , G.J. Kenny
{"title":"Are floods getting worse in the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna basins?","authors":"M. Monirul Qader Mirza ,&nbsp;R.A. Warrick ,&nbsp;N.J. Ericksen ,&nbsp;G.J. Kenny","doi":"10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00019-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna/Barak rivers are lifelines for millions of people in South Asia in Nepal, India, Bhutan and Bangladesh. They supply water for food and fibre production and for industrial and domestic purposes. They are also sources of disastrous floods that cause substantial damage to agriculture and infrastructure in these countries. There are claims that flood discharges, areal extent, and damage-costs are getting worse in the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna/Barak basins. The validity of these claims was examined by applying four different statistical tests to the peak discharge time series and flooded areas. The results indicate that no conclusive changes have occurred over the last few decades. Reports of increased flood damage may be due to a combination of other factors, such as improved damage assessment techniques, and the expansion and intensification of settlement in flood-prone areas, but this was not tested in this paper and should be top priority for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100587,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 37-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00019-5","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464286701000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna/Barak rivers are lifelines for millions of people in South Asia in Nepal, India, Bhutan and Bangladesh. They supply water for food and fibre production and for industrial and domestic purposes. They are also sources of disastrous floods that cause substantial damage to agriculture and infrastructure in these countries. There are claims that flood discharges, areal extent, and damage-costs are getting worse in the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna/Barak basins. The validity of these claims was examined by applying four different statistical tests to the peak discharge time series and flooded areas. The results indicate that no conclusive changes have occurred over the last few decades. Reports of increased flood damage may be due to a combination of other factors, such as improved damage assessment techniques, and the expansion and intensification of settlement in flood-prone areas, but this was not tested in this paper and should be top priority for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恒河、雅鲁藏布江和梅克纳河流域的洪水是否越来越严重?
恒河、雅鲁藏布江和梅克纳河/巴拉克河是南亚尼泊尔、印度、不丹和孟加拉国数百万人的生命线。它们为食品和纤维生产以及工业和家庭用途提供水。它们也是灾难性洪水的来源,对这些国家的农业和基础设施造成重大破坏。有人声称,恒河、雅鲁藏布江和梅克纳/巴拉克流域的洪水流量、面积范围和损失成本正在恶化。通过对峰值放电时间序列和洪水区域应用四种不同的统计测试来检验这些说法的有效性。结果表明,在过去的几十年里没有发生决定性的变化。洪水损失增加的报告可能是由于其他因素的组合,例如改进的损害评估技术,以及洪水易发地区的沉降的扩大和加剧,但这在本文中没有得到验证,应该是未来研究的重中之重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publisher's Note Is staying at home the safest option during bushfires? Historical evidence for an Australian approach A potential crisis in wildfire emergency response capability? Australia's volunteer firefighters Mitigation of the heat island effect in urban New Jersey Interactions between scientific uncertainty and flood management decisions: Two case studies in Colorado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1