Risk communication in an informal settlement during COVID-19: Case of Dinaweng, Bloemfontein South Africa

Abraham R Matamanda , Verna Nel , Lucia Leboto-Khetsi , Mischka Dunn
{"title":"Risk communication in an informal settlement during COVID-19: Case of Dinaweng, Bloemfontein South Africa","authors":"Abraham R Matamanda ,&nbsp;Verna Nel ,&nbsp;Lucia Leboto-Khetsi ,&nbsp;Mischka Dunn","doi":"10.1016/j.ugj.2022.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article interrogates the nuances of risk communication in a poor neighbourhood of South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that risk communication had multifaceted implications for managing and governing the COVID-19 pandemic. This pandemic has coincided with the information age, where multiple communication channels affect the success of risk communication through miscommunication, false news, or distortion. Using a qualitative study premised on a phenomenological research design, data were collected from 60 purposively sampled residents in Bloemfontein to capture their perspectives regarding risk communication on COVID-19. This data was triangulated with secondary sources to enhance the validity of the findings. Among the secondary data sources are reviews of news media outlets reporting on the COVID-19 pandemic at the international and the local level. The study's findings reveal that the poor residing in informal settlements are marginalised in risk communication. This is mainly a result of the digital divide that has resulted in challenges for the poor communities in accessing specific news channels, while also making it difficult for them to validate some information.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101266,"journal":{"name":"Urban Governance","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 296-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328622000651/pdfft?md5=ec7d2704ad613ae05c9ad213ac08648f&pid=1-s2.0-S2664328622000651-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328622000651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article interrogates the nuances of risk communication in a poor neighbourhood of South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that risk communication had multifaceted implications for managing and governing the COVID-19 pandemic. This pandemic has coincided with the information age, where multiple communication channels affect the success of risk communication through miscommunication, false news, or distortion. Using a qualitative study premised on a phenomenological research design, data were collected from 60 purposively sampled residents in Bloemfontein to capture their perspectives regarding risk communication on COVID-19. This data was triangulated with secondary sources to enhance the validity of the findings. Among the secondary data sources are reviews of news media outlets reporting on the COVID-19 pandemic at the international and the local level. The study's findings reveal that the poor residing in informal settlements are marginalised in risk communication. This is mainly a result of the digital divide that has resulted in challenges for the poor communities in accessing specific news channels, while also making it difficult for them to validate some information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病期间非正式住区的风险沟通:南非布隆方丹Dinaweng案例
本文探讨了2019冠状病毒病大流行期间南非贫困社区风险沟通的细微差别。我们认为,风险沟通对COVID-19大流行的管理和治理具有多方面的影响。这次大流行正值信息时代,在这个时代,多种沟通渠道通过错误沟通、虚假新闻或歪曲影响风险沟通的成功。采用现象学研究设计为前提的定性研究,从布隆方丹的60名有目的地抽样的居民中收集数据,以捕捉他们对COVID-19风险沟通的看法。这些数据与次要来源进行了三角测量,以提高研究结果的有效性。二手数据来源包括对国际和地方两级报道COVID-19大流行的新闻媒体的审查。研究结果表明,居住在非正式定居点的穷人在风险沟通中被边缘化。这主要是由于数字鸿沟导致贫困社区在获取特定新闻渠道方面面临挑战,同时也使他们难以核实某些信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Households’ access and expenditure on water services: Examining intra-urban differences in the Accra metropolis, Ghana Reimagining cities as self-organising capital creating ecosystems Urban resilience: Multidimensional perspectives, challenges and prospects for future research Looking into urban toponymic verticality: An initial note Tracking the adoption of sustainable trash disposal practices: Evidence from Benin’s waste management amid urbanization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1