Role of the patient's social features in the destiny of cryopreserved surplus embryos

Jose Manuel Molina, Marissa Riqueros, Mireia Florensa, Agustín Ballesteros, Marga Esbert
{"title":"Role of the patient's social features in the destiny of cryopreserved surplus embryos","authors":"Jose Manuel Molina,&nbsp;Marissa Riqueros,&nbsp;Mireia Florensa,&nbsp;Agustín Ballesteros,&nbsp;Marga Esbert","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2020.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>With the advances in assisted reproduction techniques and above all thanks to the implementation of vitrification, there are more and more surplus pre-embryos in assisted reproduction cycles.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Retrospective observational study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The maternal age of patients who decided to donate their pre-embryos to other patients (41.38<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.55) was higher than those who preferred to donate to research (39.56<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.89), keep them for future use (37.38<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.72), or discard them for no other purpose (40.87<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.21) <em>p</em>-value: &lt;0.05.</p><p>International patients decide to discard their pre-embryos for no other purpose (26.81% vs 21.30%; <em>p</em>-value: &lt;0.05) or donate them to other couples (19.56% vs 14.04; <em>p</em>-value: &lt;0.05) in greater proportion than national patients. In contrast, the percentage of national patients who decide to donate their embryos to research is greater than that of international patients (35.84% vs 28.50%; <em>p</em>-value: &lt;0.05).</p><p>When we compared the responses obtained in terms of the origin of the oocytes (own or donated), we found that those who used donated oocytes decided to donate them to other couples in a higher percentage than those who used their own oocytes (21.67% vs 5.26%; <em>p</em>-value: &gt;0.05). Patients who used donated oocytes decided to keep their pre-embryos in a lower percentage than patients who used their own oocytes (21.44% vs 41.75; <em>p</em>-value: &lt;0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>According to this study, maternal age, nationality and origin of the oocytes are factors that can influence patients’ decisions about what to do with their surplus embryos from assisted reproduction cycles. In addition, it reiterates as in other studies that an improvement in the processes and circuits is necessary to obtain a greater number of responses from patients more.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 68-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932020300128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

With the advances in assisted reproduction techniques and above all thanks to the implementation of vitrification, there are more and more surplus pre-embryos in assisted reproduction cycles.

Material and methods

Retrospective observational study.

Results

The maternal age of patients who decided to donate their pre-embryos to other patients (41.38 ± 4.55) was higher than those who preferred to donate to research (39.56 ± 4.89), keep them for future use (37.38 ± 4.72), or discard them for no other purpose (40.87 ± 5.21) p-value: <0.05.

International patients decide to discard their pre-embryos for no other purpose (26.81% vs 21.30%; p-value: <0.05) or donate them to other couples (19.56% vs 14.04; p-value: <0.05) in greater proportion than national patients. In contrast, the percentage of national patients who decide to donate their embryos to research is greater than that of international patients (35.84% vs 28.50%; p-value: <0.05).

When we compared the responses obtained in terms of the origin of the oocytes (own or donated), we found that those who used donated oocytes decided to donate them to other couples in a higher percentage than those who used their own oocytes (21.67% vs 5.26%; p-value: >0.05). Patients who used donated oocytes decided to keep their pre-embryos in a lower percentage than patients who used their own oocytes (21.44% vs 41.75; p-value: <0.05).

Conclusions

According to this study, maternal age, nationality and origin of the oocytes are factors that can influence patients’ decisions about what to do with their surplus embryos from assisted reproduction cycles. In addition, it reiterates as in other studies that an improvement in the processes and circuits is necessary to obtain a greater number of responses from patients more.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者社会特征在冷冻剩余胚胎命运中的作用
背景与目的随着辅助生殖技术的进步,尤其是玻璃化技术的应用,辅助生殖周期中存在越来越多的剩余前胚胎。材料与方法回顾性观察研究。结果决定将胚胎捐献给他人的产妇年龄(41.38±4.55)高于选择捐献给研究(39.56±4.89)、保留备用(37.38±4.72)、丢弃(40.87±5.21)的产妇年龄(p < 0.05)。国际患者决定无其他目的丢弃他们的前胚胎(26.81% vs 21.30%;p值:<0.05)或捐给其他夫妇(19.56% vs 14.04;p值:<0.05)。相比之下,决定将胚胎捐献给研究的本国患者比例高于国际患者(35.84% vs 28.50%;假定值:& lt; 0.05)。当我们就卵母细胞的来源(自己的或捐赠的)进行比较时,我们发现使用捐赠卵母细胞的夫妇决定将其捐赠给其他夫妇的比例高于使用自己卵母细胞的夫妇(21.67% vs 5.26%;假定值:在0.05)。使用捐赠卵母细胞的患者决定保留其前胚胎的比例低于使用自己卵母细胞的患者(21.44% vs 41.75%;假定值:& lt; 0.05)。结论根据本研究,母亲的年龄、国籍和卵母细胞的来源是影响患者决定如何处理辅助生殖周期中剩余胚胎的因素。此外,与其他研究一样,该研究重申,为了从患者身上获得更多的反应,必须改善这些过程和回路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extended embryo culture up to 14 days Impact of administration route on serum progesterone levels in women undergoing artificial endometrial preparation Efecto de la abstinencia sexual masculina en los resultados reproductivos Sperm DNA fragmentation and microfluidics: A new era in human sperm selection Aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en el laboratorio de reproducción asistida. Trabajo de revisión
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1