Safety study of autologous adult bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - Pilot data

Lakshmi Kiran Chelluri , Upasna Upadhyay , Ravindra Nallagonda , Sudhir Prasad , Mohammad Samiuddin , Rajat Mohanty , Chandrashekar Mallarpu , Meenakshi Ponnana , Sindhoora Rawul , Eswara Prasad Chelluri
{"title":"Safety study of autologous adult bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - Pilot data","authors":"Lakshmi Kiran Chelluri ,&nbsp;Upasna Upadhyay ,&nbsp;Ravindra Nallagonda ,&nbsp;Sudhir Prasad ,&nbsp;Mohammad Samiuddin ,&nbsp;Rajat Mohanty ,&nbsp;Chandrashekar Mallarpu ,&nbsp;Meenakshi Ponnana ,&nbsp;Sindhoora Rawul ,&nbsp;Eswara Prasad Chelluri","doi":"10.1016/j.nhtm.2017.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Lung transplantation<span><span> is the choice of therapy in severe cases of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) but is compounded with post-transplant complications. The paucity of deceased organ donations underlines the need for alternate approaches that improves the </span>quality of life<span>. Herein, we attempted to develop an autologous adult bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cell (BMSC) therapy via central line access, and evaluated the safety of a single dose (~13 × 10</span></span></span><sup>6</sup> <!-->cells/mL), in treating “no option” IPF.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>The study included severe IPF subjects (n = 6) both male and female, aged 40–70 years of age with a forced vital capacity<span> &lt;50%, diffusing capacity<span> of lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) &lt;35% of predicted, and/or oxygen (SpO</span></span></span><sub>2</sub>) saturation &lt;88% on 6<!--> <!-->min walk distance (6 MWD). BMSCs at passage 2 were suspended in 30.0<!--> <span>mL normal saline and dispensed through the central line route in a respiratory intensive care unit of Gleneagles Global Hospitals. The subjects were monitored for the first 24</span> <span>h for serious adverse events and hemodynamic<span> parameters. They were followed up periodically at intervals of 1, 4, and 9 months for safety and monitoring of adverse events, including secondary objectives of changes in pulmonary function test, DLco, 6 MWD, and quality of life as per the study protocol.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>It was observed that central line infusions were well tolerated by all subjects. Furthermore, there was an improved quality of life.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>BMSC central line infusion in “no option” IPF cases provided an insight into the strategies in improving the quality of life for patient and thereby increasing the therapeutic window period for lung transplantation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90660,"journal":{"name":"New horizons in translational medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nhtm.2017.10.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New horizons in translational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307502317300371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Lung transplantation is the choice of therapy in severe cases of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) but is compounded with post-transplant complications. The paucity of deceased organ donations underlines the need for alternate approaches that improves the quality of life. Herein, we attempted to develop an autologous adult bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cell (BMSC) therapy via central line access, and evaluated the safety of a single dose (~13 × 106 cells/mL), in treating “no option” IPF.

Method

The study included severe IPF subjects (n = 6) both male and female, aged 40–70 years of age with a forced vital capacity <50%, diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) <35% of predicted, and/or oxygen (SpO2) saturation <88% on 6 min walk distance (6 MWD). BMSCs at passage 2 were suspended in 30.0 mL normal saline and dispensed through the central line route in a respiratory intensive care unit of Gleneagles Global Hospitals. The subjects were monitored for the first 24 h for serious adverse events and hemodynamic parameters. They were followed up periodically at intervals of 1, 4, and 9 months for safety and monitoring of adverse events, including secondary objectives of changes in pulmonary function test, DLco, 6 MWD, and quality of life as per the study protocol.

Results

It was observed that central line infusions were well tolerated by all subjects. Furthermore, there was an improved quality of life.

Conclusions

BMSC central line infusion in “no option” IPF cases provided an insight into the strategies in improving the quality of life for patient and thereby increasing the therapeutic window period for lung transplantation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自体成人骨髓间充质间质细胞治疗特发性肺纤维化的安全性研究-先导数据
肺移植是特发性肺纤维化(IPF)重症病例的治疗选择,但移植后并发症复杂。死者器官捐献的缺乏强调了需要其他方法来提高生活质量。在本研究中,我们尝试通过中线通路开发一种自体成人骨髓间充质基质细胞(BMSC)疗法,并评估单剂量(~13 × 106细胞/mL)治疗“无选择”IPF的安全性。方法研究纳入重症IPF患者(n = 6),年龄40 ~ 70岁,强迫肺活量为50%,肺弥散量为预测值的35%,6 min步行距离(6 MWD)时肺氧饱和度为88%。在格伦伊格尔斯全球医院的呼吸重症监护室,将传代2的骨髓间充质干细胞悬浮在30.0 mL生理盐水中,并通过中央静脉输送。在前24小时监测受试者的严重不良事件和血流动力学参数。随访时间间隔为1、4和9个月,以监测不良事件的安全性,包括次要目标肺功能测试、DLco、6mwd和生活质量的变化。结果所有受试者均对中心静脉输注耐受良好。此外,生活质量也有所提高。结论sbmsc中心静脉输注在“无选择”IPF病例中提供了改善患者生活质量的策略,从而增加了肺移植的治疗窗口期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Improving disease diagnosis by a new hybrid model Pros, cons and future of antibiotics Abstracts: 5th Annual Congress of the European Society for Translational Medicine (EUSTM-2017), 20-22 October 2017, Berlin, Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1