Factors influencing retention of resin-based luting systems on implants: A systematic review

Elisabeth Prause , Jeremias Hey , Florian Beuer , Martin Rosentritt
{"title":"Factors influencing retention of resin-based luting systems on implants: A systematic review","authors":"Elisabeth Prause ,&nbsp;Jeremias Hey ,&nbsp;Florian Beuer ,&nbsp;Martin Rosentritt","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2022.100056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The large variety in materials makes it difficult for dentists to select the right material for appropriate retention of single crowns on implants. An assessment of the retentive force and influencing parameters is lacking. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the retention values of resin-based luting materials of single tooth crowns on implants. Influencing factors, such as the abutment geometry, different pretreatment options, or the application of resin-based systems, are taken into account.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A Pubmed-Medline library search was conducted, supported by manual searching, to collect available studies between the years 2005 to 2020. The following MeSH terms were used: “dental AND implant AND crown AND cementation AND retention”, as well as other combinations to identify as many studies as possible.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After setting the filters and deleting the duplicates, 269 studies were identified. Finally, 23 studies were considered eligible for this review. Resin-based adhesive luting materials in combination with a primer showed the highest retention values. The retention is significantly influenced by a small cement gap, high loading during cementation, and pretreatment of the abutment. A low bias risk was shown for all included studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The large number of available resin-based luting materials offer dentists the possibility to influence the individual retention of single-tooth crowns on implants. According to the present study, retentive strength can be clinically influenced not only by the choice of luting material. A pretreatment using sandblasting and an appropriate primer influences retention positively. Exerting pressure on the restoration after cementation also leads to increased retention. However, clinical studies would be desirable for the future to further investigate the results of this review.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559622000219/pdfft?md5=f7266ad17ddb21c5e71e3a1e69da2fa1&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559622000219-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559622000219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The large variety in materials makes it difficult for dentists to select the right material for appropriate retention of single crowns on implants. An assessment of the retentive force and influencing parameters is lacking. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the retention values of resin-based luting materials of single tooth crowns on implants. Influencing factors, such as the abutment geometry, different pretreatment options, or the application of resin-based systems, are taken into account.

Methods

A Pubmed-Medline library search was conducted, supported by manual searching, to collect available studies between the years 2005 to 2020. The following MeSH terms were used: “dental AND implant AND crown AND cementation AND retention”, as well as other combinations to identify as many studies as possible.

Results

After setting the filters and deleting the duplicates, 269 studies were identified. Finally, 23 studies were considered eligible for this review. Resin-based adhesive luting materials in combination with a primer showed the highest retention values. The retention is significantly influenced by a small cement gap, high loading during cementation, and pretreatment of the abutment. A low bias risk was shown for all included studies.

Conclusions

The large number of available resin-based luting materials offer dentists the possibility to influence the individual retention of single-tooth crowns on implants. According to the present study, retentive strength can be clinically influenced not only by the choice of luting material. A pretreatment using sandblasting and an appropriate primer influences retention positively. Exerting pressure on the restoration after cementation also leads to increased retention. However, clinical studies would be desirable for the future to further investigate the results of this review.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响树脂基luting系统在种植体上固位的因素:系统综述
目的:由于材料种类繁多,牙医很难选择合适的材料来进行种植体单冠固位。缺乏对固位力和影响参数的评估。本系统综述的目的是概述树脂基固定材料在种植体单牙冠上的固位价值。影响因素,如基台几何形状,不同的预处理选择,或树脂基系统的应用,都要考虑在内。方法采用Pubmed-Medline图书馆检索方法,以人工检索为辅助,收集2005 ~ 2020年的文献。使用以下MeSH术语:“dental AND implant AND crown AND cementation AND retention”,以及其他组合来识别尽可能多的研究。结果设置筛选器并删除重复项后,共鉴定出269项研究。最后,23项研究被认为符合本综述的条件。树脂基胶粘剂与底漆结合使用时,保留值最高。胶结间隙小、胶结时载荷大、基台预处理对固位有显著影响。所有纳入的研究显示偏倚风险较低。结论大量可用的树脂基支架材料为牙医提供了影响种植体单牙冠固位的可能性。根据目前的研究,临床中影响固位强度的不仅仅是固位材料的选择。喷砂预处理和适当的底漆对保持性有积极影响。在固接后对修复体施加压力也会导致固位增加。然而,未来需要临床研究来进一步研究本综述的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soft tissue management as part of peri‑implantitis treatment: When, why and how? Engineered Small Extra-Cellular Vesicles for Endogenous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Recruitment and in situ Periodontal Tissue Regeneration Periodontitis Gingival Tissue Exosomes Cross and Compromise Human BBB in an In-Vitro 3D Model The Use of Phage Therapy in Reduction of Oral Cavity Bacteria: A Literature Review Will CAD/CAM Technology Increase the Effectiveness of Clinicians?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1