Evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3D printed molds in the intraoperative setting.

IF 3.2 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING 3D printing in medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-12 DOI:10.1186/s41205-022-00156-6
Brian Beitler, Gregory R Roytman, Grace Parmer, Steven M Tommasini, Daniel H Wiznia
{"title":"Evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3D printed molds in the intraoperative setting.","authors":"Brian Beitler,&nbsp;Gregory R Roytman,&nbsp;Grace Parmer,&nbsp;Steven M Tommasini,&nbsp;Daniel H Wiznia","doi":"10.1186/s41205-022-00156-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polymethyl methacrylate, or \"bone cement,\" can be used intraoperatively to replace damaged or diseased bone and to deliver local antibiotics. 3D printed molds allow surgeons to form personalized and custom shapes with bone cement. One factor hindering the clinical utility of anatomically accurate 3D printed molds is that cured bone cement can be difficult to remove due to the strong adhesion between the mold and the bone cement. One way to reduce the adhesion between the 3D printed mold and the cured bone cement is with the use of a surface coating, such as a lubricant. This study sought to determine the optimal surface coating to prevent bone cement adhesion to 3D printed molds that could be utilized within a sterile operating room environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hemispheric molds were 3D printed using a stereolithography printer. The molds were coated with four sterile surface coatings available in most operating theatres (light mineral oil, bacitracin ointment, lubricating jelly, and ultrasound transmission gel). Polymethyl methacrylate with tobramycin antibiotic was mixed and poured into the molds. The amount of force needed to \"push out\" the cured bone cement from the molds was measured to determine the efficacy of each surface coating. Tukey's multiple comparison test was performed to compare the results of the pushout test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average pushout force for the surface coatings, in increasing order, were as follows (mean ± standard deviation) --- bacitracin ointment: 9.10 ± 6.68 N, mineral oil: 104.93 ± 69.92 N, lubricating jelly: 147.76 ± 63.77 N, control group: 339.31 ± 305.20 N, ultrasound transmission gel 474.11 ± 94.77 N. Only the bacitracin ointment required significantly less pushout force than the control (p = 0.0123).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The bacitracin ointment was the most effective surface coating, allowing the bone cement to be pushed out of the mold using the least amount of force. In addition, the low standard deviation speaks to the reliability of the bacitracin ointment to reduce mold adhesion compared to the other surface coatings. Given its efficacy as well as its ubiquitous presence in the hospital operating room setting, bacitracin ointment is an excellent choice to prevent adhesion between bone cement and 3D printed molds intraoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373469/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00156-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Polymethyl methacrylate, or "bone cement," can be used intraoperatively to replace damaged or diseased bone and to deliver local antibiotics. 3D printed molds allow surgeons to form personalized and custom shapes with bone cement. One factor hindering the clinical utility of anatomically accurate 3D printed molds is that cured bone cement can be difficult to remove due to the strong adhesion between the mold and the bone cement. One way to reduce the adhesion between the 3D printed mold and the cured bone cement is with the use of a surface coating, such as a lubricant. This study sought to determine the optimal surface coating to prevent bone cement adhesion to 3D printed molds that could be utilized within a sterile operating room environment.

Methods: Hemispheric molds were 3D printed using a stereolithography printer. The molds were coated with four sterile surface coatings available in most operating theatres (light mineral oil, bacitracin ointment, lubricating jelly, and ultrasound transmission gel). Polymethyl methacrylate with tobramycin antibiotic was mixed and poured into the molds. The amount of force needed to "push out" the cured bone cement from the molds was measured to determine the efficacy of each surface coating. Tukey's multiple comparison test was performed to compare the results of the pushout test.

Results: The average pushout force for the surface coatings, in increasing order, were as follows (mean ± standard deviation) --- bacitracin ointment: 9.10 ± 6.68 N, mineral oil: 104.93 ± 69.92 N, lubricating jelly: 147.76 ± 63.77 N, control group: 339.31 ± 305.20 N, ultrasound transmission gel 474.11 ± 94.77 N. Only the bacitracin ointment required significantly less pushout force than the control (p = 0.0123).

Conclusions: The bacitracin ointment was the most effective surface coating, allowing the bone cement to be pushed out of the mold using the least amount of force. In addition, the low standard deviation speaks to the reliability of the bacitracin ointment to reduce mold adhesion compared to the other surface coatings. Given its efficacy as well as its ubiquitous presence in the hospital operating room setting, bacitracin ointment is an excellent choice to prevent adhesion between bone cement and 3D printed molds intraoperatively.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估表面涂层在术中减少骨水泥与护理点3D打印模具的粘连。
背景:聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯或“骨水泥”可用于术中替代受损或患病的骨,并给药局部抗生素。3D打印模具允许外科医生用骨水泥形成个性化和定制的形状。阻碍解剖精确3D打印模具临床应用的一个因素是,由于模具和骨水泥之间的强附着力,固化的骨水泥很难去除。减少3D打印模具和固化骨水泥之间粘附的一种方法是使用表面涂层,如润滑剂。本研究旨在确定最佳的表面涂层,以防止骨水泥粘附在可在无菌手术室环境中使用的3D打印模具上。方法:采用立体光刻打印机对半球形模具进行3D打印。在模具表面涂上大多数手术室可用的四种无菌涂层(轻矿物油、杆菌肽软膏、润滑果冻和超声透射凝胶)。将聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯与妥布霉素抗生素混合后倒入模具中。测量将固化骨水泥从模具中“推出”所需的力,以确定每种表面涂层的功效。采用Tukey多重比较检验对推出试验结果进行比较。结果:表面涂层的平均推出力依次为(平均值±标准差):杆菌肽软膏:9.10±6.68 N,矿物油:104.93±69.92 N,润滑果冻:147.76±63.77 N,对照组:339.31±305.20 N,超声透射凝胶:474.11±94.77 N。只有杆菌肽软膏所需的推力明显小于对照组(p = 0.0123)。结论:杆菌肽软膏是最有效的表面涂层,可以用最小的力将骨水泥推出模具。此外,与其他表面涂层相比,低标准偏差说明了杆菌肽软膏在减少霉菌粘附方面的可靠性。鉴于其有效性以及在医院手术室中无处不在的存在,杆菌肽软膏是防止术中骨水泥与3D打印模具粘连的绝佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development and assessment of case-specific physical and augmented reality simulators for intracranial aneurysm clipping. Fast and accurate distal locking of interlocked intramedullary nails using computer-vision and a 3D printed device. Metamaterial design for aortic aneurysm simulation using 3D printing. 3D-printing inherently MRI-visible accessories in aiding MRI-guided biopsies. Effectiveness of a new 3D printed simulator for mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in enhancing the confidence and procedural skills of the operator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1