Dimensional Change Card Sorting of American Children: Marginalization-Related Diminished Returns of Age.

Children and teenagers Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-23 DOI:10.22158/ct.v3n2p72
Shervin Assari
{"title":"Dimensional Change Card Sorting of American Children: Marginalization-Related Diminished Returns of Age.","authors":"Shervin Assari","doi":"10.22158/ct.v3n2p72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While age is associated with an increase in cognitive flexibility and executive functioning as a result of normal development during childhood, less is known about the effect of racial variation in children's age-related cognitive development. The Marginalization-related Diminished Returns (MDRs) phenomenon suggests that, under racism, social stratification, segregation, and discrimination, individual-level economic and non-economic resources and assets show weaker effects on children's development for marginalized, racialized, and minoritized families.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We conducted this study to compare racial groups of children for age-related changes in their card sorting abilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 10,414 9-10-year-old American children. Data came from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. The independent variable was age, a continuous variable measured in months. The dependent variable was dimensional change card sort (DCCS) score, which reflected cognitive flexibility, and was measured by the NIH Dimensional Change Card Sort. Ethnicity, sex, parental education, and marital status were the covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older age was associated with higher DCCS score, reflecting a higher card-sorting ability and cognitive flexibility. However, age showed a weaker association with DCCS for Black than for White children. This was documented by a significantly negative interaction between race and age on children's DCCS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age shows a weaker correlation with the cognitive flexibility of Black than of White children. A similar pattern can be seen when comparing low-income with high-income children. Conceptualizing race as a social factor that alters normal childhood development is a finding that is in line with MDRs. Marginalization due to social stratification and racism interfere with the normal age-related cognitive development of American children.</p>","PeriodicalId":72575,"journal":{"name":"Children and teenagers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and teenagers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/ct.v3n2p72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While age is associated with an increase in cognitive flexibility and executive functioning as a result of normal development during childhood, less is known about the effect of racial variation in children's age-related cognitive development. The Marginalization-related Diminished Returns (MDRs) phenomenon suggests that, under racism, social stratification, segregation, and discrimination, individual-level economic and non-economic resources and assets show weaker effects on children's development for marginalized, racialized, and minoritized families.

Aim: We conducted this study to compare racial groups of children for age-related changes in their card sorting abilities.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 10,414 9-10-year-old American children. Data came from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. The independent variable was age, a continuous variable measured in months. The dependent variable was dimensional change card sort (DCCS) score, which reflected cognitive flexibility, and was measured by the NIH Dimensional Change Card Sort. Ethnicity, sex, parental education, and marital status were the covariates.

Results: Older age was associated with higher DCCS score, reflecting a higher card-sorting ability and cognitive flexibility. However, age showed a weaker association with DCCS for Black than for White children. This was documented by a significantly negative interaction between race and age on children's DCCS scores.

Conclusion: Age shows a weaker correlation with the cognitive flexibility of Black than of White children. A similar pattern can be seen when comparing low-income with high-income children. Conceptualizing race as a social factor that alters normal childhood development is a finding that is in line with MDRs. Marginalization due to social stratification and racism interfere with the normal age-related cognitive development of American children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国儿童的维度变化卡分类:与边缘化有关的年龄收益递减。
背景:虽然年龄与认知灵活性和执行功能的提高有关,这是儿童期正常发展的结果,但人们对种族差异对儿童年龄相关认知发展的影响却知之甚少。边缘化相关收益递减(MDRs)现象表明,在种族主义、社会分层、种族隔离和歧视的情况下,个人层面的经济和非经济资源及资产对边缘化、种族化和少数民族家庭儿童的发展影响较弱:这项横断面研究包括 10,414 名 9-10 岁的美国儿童。数据来自青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究。自变量是年龄,这是一个以月为单位的连续变量。因变量是维度变化卡片排序(DCCS)得分,它反映了认知灵活性,由美国国立卫生研究院维度变化卡片排序测量。种族、性别、父母教育程度和婚姻状况是协变量:结果:年龄越大,DCCS 得分越高,这反映了较高的卡片分类能力和认知灵活性。然而,黑人儿童的年龄与 DCCS 的相关性要弱于白人儿童。种族和年龄对儿童 DCCS 分数的影响呈明显的负相关:结论:与白人儿童相比,黑人儿童的年龄与认知灵活性的相关性较弱。结论:黑人儿童的年龄与认知灵活性的相关性比白人儿童弱,在比较低收入儿童和高收入儿童时也可以看到类似的模式。将种族视为改变儿童正常发展的社会因素,这一结论与 MDRs 是一致的。社会分层和种族主义导致的边缘化影响了美国儿童与年龄相关的正常认知发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subalternity and Displacement in Rafia Zakaria’s “Upstairs Wife”: A Critique upon Pakistani Fiction Navigating Wellbeing and Coping: Quantitative Analysis of The Experiences of Teenager of Infidel Parents in Ibadan Where are the Parents? The Drama of Youth Crime in the Media an Australian Focussed Discourse Analysis Teachers’ Efforts and Barriers to Implementing Empirically-Based Practices in Addressing Disability Stigma Fear and Anxiety, as Reflected in Israeli Children’s Books
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1