Nephrologist Follow-Up versus Usual Care after an Acute Kidney Injury Hospitalization (FUSION): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.2215/CJN.17331120
Samuel A Silver, Neill K Adhikari, Chaim M Bell, Christopher T Chan, Ziv Harel, Abhijat Kitchlu, Alejandro Meraz-Muñoz, Patrick A Norman, Adic Perez, Alireza Zahirieh, Ron Wald
{"title":"Nephrologist Follow-Up versus Usual Care after an Acute Kidney Injury Hospitalization (FUSION): A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Samuel A Silver,&nbsp;Neill K Adhikari,&nbsp;Chaim M Bell,&nbsp;Christopher T Chan,&nbsp;Ziv Harel,&nbsp;Abhijat Kitchlu,&nbsp;Alejandro Meraz-Muñoz,&nbsp;Patrick A Norman,&nbsp;Adic Perez,&nbsp;Alireza Zahirieh,&nbsp;Ron Wald","doi":"10.2215/CJN.17331120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Survivors of AKI are at higher risk of CKD and death, but few patients see a nephrologist after hospital discharge. Our objectives during this 2-year vanguard phase trial were to determine the feasibility of randomizing survivors of AKI to early follow-up with a nephrologist or usual care, and to collect data on care processes and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, participants, & measurements: </strong>We performed a randomized controlled trial in patients hospitalized with Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage 2-3 AKI at four hospitals in Toronto, Canada. We randomized patients to early nephrologist follow-up (standardized basket of care that emphasized BP control, cardiovascular risk reduction, and medication safety) or usual care from July 2015 to June 2017. Feasibility outcomes included the proportion of eligible patients enrolled, seen by a nephrologist, and followed to 1 year. The primary clinical outcome was a major adverse kidney event at 1 year, defined as death, maintenance dialysis, or incident/progressive CKD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 3687 participants from July 2015 to June 2017, of whom 269 were eligible. We randomized 71 (26%) patients (34 to nephrology follow-up and 37 to usual care). The primary reason stated for declining enrollment included hospitalization-related fatigue (<i>n</i>=65), reluctance to add more doctors to the health care team (<i>n</i>=59), and long travel times (<i>n</i>=40). Nephrologist visits occurred in 24 of 34 (71%) intervention participants, compared with three of 37 (8%) participants randomized to usual care. The primary clinical outcome occurred in 15 of 34 (44%) patients in the nephrologist follow-up arm, and 16 of 37 (43%) patients in the usual care arm (relative risk, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 1.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Major adverse kidney events are common in AKI survivors, but we found the in-person model of follow-up posed a variety of barriers that was not acceptable to many patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry name and registration number: </strong>Nephrologist Follow-up versus Usual Care after an Acute Kidney Injury Hospitalization (FUSION), NCT02483039 CJASN 16: 1005-1014, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.17331120.</p>","PeriodicalId":50681,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","volume":"16 7","pages":"1005-1014"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425610/pdf/","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.17331120","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Background and objectives: Survivors of AKI are at higher risk of CKD and death, but few patients see a nephrologist after hospital discharge. Our objectives during this 2-year vanguard phase trial were to determine the feasibility of randomizing survivors of AKI to early follow-up with a nephrologist or usual care, and to collect data on care processes and outcomes.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: We performed a randomized controlled trial in patients hospitalized with Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage 2-3 AKI at four hospitals in Toronto, Canada. We randomized patients to early nephrologist follow-up (standardized basket of care that emphasized BP control, cardiovascular risk reduction, and medication safety) or usual care from July 2015 to June 2017. Feasibility outcomes included the proportion of eligible patients enrolled, seen by a nephrologist, and followed to 1 year. The primary clinical outcome was a major adverse kidney event at 1 year, defined as death, maintenance dialysis, or incident/progressive CKD.

Results: We screened 3687 participants from July 2015 to June 2017, of whom 269 were eligible. We randomized 71 (26%) patients (34 to nephrology follow-up and 37 to usual care). The primary reason stated for declining enrollment included hospitalization-related fatigue (n=65), reluctance to add more doctors to the health care team (n=59), and long travel times (n=40). Nephrologist visits occurred in 24 of 34 (71%) intervention participants, compared with three of 37 (8%) participants randomized to usual care. The primary clinical outcome occurred in 15 of 34 (44%) patients in the nephrologist follow-up arm, and 16 of 37 (43%) patients in the usual care arm (relative risk, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 1.73).

Conclusions: Major adverse kidney events are common in AKI survivors, but we found the in-person model of follow-up posed a variety of barriers that was not acceptable to many patients.

Clinical trial registry name and registration number: Nephrologist Follow-up versus Usual Care after an Acute Kidney Injury Hospitalization (FUSION), NCT02483039 CJASN 16: 1005-1014, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.17331120.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性肾损伤住院(FUSION)后肾脏科随访与常规护理:一项随机对照试验。
背景和目的:AKI幸存者发生CKD和死亡的风险较高,但很少有患者在出院后去看肾病科医生。在这项为期2年的先锋期试验中,我们的目标是确定将AKI幸存者随机分配到肾脏科医生或常规护理的早期随访的可行性,并收集护理过程和结果的数据。设计、环境、参与者和测量:我们在加拿大多伦多的四家医院进行了一项随机对照试验,研究对象是肾病改善全球结局(KDIGO) 2-3期AKI住院患者。从2015年7月至2017年6月,我们将患者随机分为早期肾病科随访(强调血压控制、心血管风险降低和药物安全的标准化一揽子护理)或常规护理。可行性结果包括纳入的符合条件的患者比例,由肾病专家观察,随访1年。主要临床结局是1年的主要肾脏不良事件,定义为死亡、维持性透析或突发/进展性CKD。结果:2015年7月至2017年6月,我们筛选了3687名参与者,其中269人符合条件。我们随机选择71例(26%)患者(34例接受肾脏病随访,37例接受常规护理)。登记人数下降的主要原因包括住院相关的疲劳(n=65),不愿意增加更多的医生到医疗团队(n=59),以及长途旅行(n=40)。34名干预参与者中有24人(71%)就诊了肾脏科医生,而37名随机接受常规治疗的参与者中有3人(8%)就诊了肾脏科医生。在肾内科随访组的34例患者中有15例(44%)出现了主要临床结局,在常规护理组的37例患者中有16例(43%)出现了主要临床结局(相对风险,1.02;95%置信区间,0.60 ~ 1.73)。结论:主要的肾脏不良事件在AKI幸存者中很常见,但我们发现亲自随访的模式存在各种障碍,这对许多患者来说是不可接受的。临床试验注册名称和注册号:急性肾损伤住院(FUSION)后的肾科随访与常规护理,NCT02483039 CJASN 16: 1005-1014, 2021。doi: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.17331120。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology strives to establish itself as the foremost authority in communicating and influencing advances in clinical nephrology by (1) swiftly and effectively disseminating pivotal developments in clinical and translational research in nephrology, encompassing innovations in research methods and care delivery; (2) providing context for these advances in relation to future research directions and patient care; and (3) becoming a key voice on issues with potential implications for the clinical practice of nephrology, particularly within the United States. Original manuscript topics cover a range of areas, including Acid/Base and Electrolyte Disorders, Acute Kidney Injury and ICU Nephrology, Chronic Kidney Disease, Clinical Nephrology, Cystic Kidney Disease, Diabetes and the Kidney, Genetics, Geriatric and Palliative Nephrology, Glomerular and Tubulointerstitial Diseases, Hypertension, Maintenance Dialysis, Mineral Metabolism, Nephrolithiasis, and Transplantation.
期刊最新文献
Principles Supporting Chronic Kidney Disease Management in Primary Care: 2025 Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guidelines. Increased Endothelin-1 and High-Risk APOL1 Variants Contribute to Albuminuria in Pediatric and Young Adults with Sickle Cell Anemia. The Intersection of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Chronic Kidney Disease. A New Hope for Treating Podocytopathies - Emerging Role of Anti-Nephrin Antibody. Frailty in Focus - A Scoping Review of Frailty Instruments on from the Kidney Disease Aging Research Collaborative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1