The environmental effects of the "twin" green and digital transition in European regions.

IF 3.2 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Environmental & Resource Economics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-09 DOI:10.1007/s10640-022-00741-7
Stefano Bianchini, Giacomo Damioli, Claudia Ghisetti
{"title":"The environmental effects of the \"twin\" green and digital transition in European regions.","authors":"Stefano Bianchini, Giacomo Damioli, Claudia Ghisetti","doi":"10.1007/s10640-022-00741-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the nexus between digital and green transformations-the so-called \"twin\" transition-in European regions in an effort to identify the impact of digital and environmental technologies on the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions originating from industrial production. We conduct an empirical analysis based on an original dataset that combines information on environmental and digital patent applications with information on GHG emissions from highly polluting plants for the period 2007-2016 at the metropolitan region level in the European Union and the UK. Results show that the local development of environmental technologies reduces GHG emissions, while the local development of digital technologies increases them, albeit in the latter case different technologies seem to have different impacts on the environment, with big data and computing infrastructures being the most detrimental. We also find differential impacts across regions depending on local endowment levels of the respective technologies: the beneficial effect of environmental technologies is stronger in regions with large digital technology endowments and, conversely, the detrimental effect of digital technologies is weaker in regions with large green technology endowments. Policy actions promoting the \"twin\" transition should take this evidence into account, in light of the potential downside of the digital transformation when not combined with the green transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48299,"journal":{"name":"Environmental & Resource Economics","volume":"84 4","pages":"877-918"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9734596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental & Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00741-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the nexus between digital and green transformations-the so-called "twin" transition-in European regions in an effort to identify the impact of digital and environmental technologies on the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions originating from industrial production. We conduct an empirical analysis based on an original dataset that combines information on environmental and digital patent applications with information on GHG emissions from highly polluting plants for the period 2007-2016 at the metropolitan region level in the European Union and the UK. Results show that the local development of environmental technologies reduces GHG emissions, while the local development of digital technologies increases them, albeit in the latter case different technologies seem to have different impacts on the environment, with big data and computing infrastructures being the most detrimental. We also find differential impacts across regions depending on local endowment levels of the respective technologies: the beneficial effect of environmental technologies is stronger in regions with large digital technology endowments and, conversely, the detrimental effect of digital technologies is weaker in regions with large green technology endowments. Policy actions promoting the "twin" transition should take this evidence into account, in light of the potential downside of the digital transformation when not combined with the green transformation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲地区绿色和数字 "双重 "转型对环境的影响。
本研究探讨了欧洲地区数字转型和绿色转型--即所谓的 "孪生 "转型--之间的联系,旨在确定数字和环保技术对工业生产产生的温室气体(GHG)排放的影响。我们基于一个原创数据集进行了实证分析,该数据集将 2007-2016 年期间欧盟和英国大都会地区层面的环境和数字专利申请信息与高污染工厂的温室气体排放信息相结合。结果显示,环保技术的本地发展减少了温室气体排放,而数字技术的本地发展则增加了温室气体排放,尽管在后一种情况下,不同的技术似乎对环境有不同的影响,其中大数据和计算基础设施的影响最大。我们还发现,不同地区的影响因当地相应技术的禀赋水平而异:在拥有大量数字技术禀赋的地区,环境技术的有利影响更强;反之,在拥有大量绿色技术禀赋的地区,数字技术的不利影响较弱。促进 "双 "转型的政策行动应考虑到这一证据,因为如果不将数字转型与绿色转型结合起来,数字转型可能会带来不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The primary concern of Environmental & Resource Economics (ERE) is the application of economic theory and methods to environmental issues and problems that require detailed analysis in order to improve management strategies. The contemporary environmental debate is in a constant state of flux and new or relatively unexplored topics are continually emerging. The Journal provides a forum for the further exploration of the causes, consequences and policy responses linked to these topics, across a range of spatial and temporal scales up to the global dimension. Contributions to the Journal should directly or indirectly be relevant to the policy formulation and application process. Areas of particular interest include: evaluation and development of instruments of environmental policy; cost-benefit and cost effectiveness analysis; sectoral environmental policy impact analysis; modelling and simulation; institutional arrangements; resource pricing and the valuation of environmental goods; environmental quality indicators. The editors wish to encourage a pluralistic approach to both theoretical and applied contributions. The publication of empirically based, policy-oriented research is given a high priority in the Journal in order to further critical discussion. Environmental & Resource Economics will also accept papers with an interdisciplinary approach, where this helps to improve knowledge of the real world complexities present, provided that the analysis retains links to or components of economic thinking. The Journal is required reading for economists, economic geographers and other academics, professionals and officials with a working interest in environmental matters.
期刊最新文献
Nudging the Food Basket Green: The Effects of Commitment and Badges on the Carbon Footprint of Food Shopping Willingness-to-Pay for Energy Efficiency: Evidence from the European Common Market Mosquitoes and Potatoes: How Local Climatic Conditions Impede Development Protecting Life and Lung: Protected Areas Affect Fine Particulate Matter and Respiratory Hospitalizations in the Brazilian Amazon Biome Nutrition and Climate Policies in the European Union: Friends or Enemies?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1