Editorial: Purchasing and innovation: Past, present and future of the field of research

IF 6.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pursup.2022.100768
Thomas Johnsen , Marie-Anne Le Dain , Nadine Kiratli , Holger Schiele
{"title":"Editorial: Purchasing and innovation: Past, present and future of the field of research","authors":"Thomas Johnsen ,&nbsp;Marie-Anne Le Dain ,&nbsp;Nadine Kiratli ,&nbsp;Holger Schiele","doi":"10.1016/j.pursup.2022.100768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper introduces the special topic forum (STF) on purchasing and innovation. Presenting the findings from a systematic literature review, we take stock of the current state of the field, delineating themes, theories and methods, and identifying key trends over time. Our study shows a take-off in research on purchasing and innovation during the last decade. This has predominantly focused on private sector manufacturing firms although a recent expansion into public sector research is evident. Large-scale surveys and case studies are still the dominant research methods where the unit of analysis is typically the ‘firm’ or ‘project’. The findings also show how in the past the field was driven by questions on how purchasing can facilitate different types of innovation projects, seeking to derive practical implications, and rarely making explicit statements regarding theories applied; this still characterises much of the research but we find an increasing focus on theory development. We also see a shift in the type of technological innovation being investigated: past studies tended to focus on the role of purchasing in new product development (NPD) projects, which reflected a relatively low degree of technological uncertainty, but we see a trend towards innovation projects facing technological uncertainty. Research shows how this requires new ways of sourcing innovations and therefore new ways for purchasing to facilitate innovation sourcing. On the basis of the review, we offer our guidance for future research avenues to 1) carry out more research on procurement of innovation in the public sector; 2) consider new theories and research methods, and 3) go beyond firm-level or dyadic analysis to research networks and ecosystems. We conclude by introducing the papers in the STF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management","volume":"28 2","pages":"Article 100768"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1478409222000231","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper introduces the special topic forum (STF) on purchasing and innovation. Presenting the findings from a systematic literature review, we take stock of the current state of the field, delineating themes, theories and methods, and identifying key trends over time. Our study shows a take-off in research on purchasing and innovation during the last decade. This has predominantly focused on private sector manufacturing firms although a recent expansion into public sector research is evident. Large-scale surveys and case studies are still the dominant research methods where the unit of analysis is typically the ‘firm’ or ‘project’. The findings also show how in the past the field was driven by questions on how purchasing can facilitate different types of innovation projects, seeking to derive practical implications, and rarely making explicit statements regarding theories applied; this still characterises much of the research but we find an increasing focus on theory development. We also see a shift in the type of technological innovation being investigated: past studies tended to focus on the role of purchasing in new product development (NPD) projects, which reflected a relatively low degree of technological uncertainty, but we see a trend towards innovation projects facing technological uncertainty. Research shows how this requires new ways of sourcing innovations and therefore new ways for purchasing to facilitate innovation sourcing. On the basis of the review, we offer our guidance for future research avenues to 1) carry out more research on procurement of innovation in the public sector; 2) consider new theories and research methods, and 3) go beyond firm-level or dyadic analysis to research networks and ecosystems. We conclude by introducing the papers in the STF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社论:采购与创新:研究领域的过去、现在和未来
本文介绍了采购与创新专题论坛(STF)。通过系统的文献综述,我们评估了该领域的现状,描述了主题、理论和方法,并确定了随着时间的推移的关键趋势。我们的研究表明,在过去十年中,关于采购和创新的研究出现了飞跃。这主要集中在私营部门的制造公司,尽管最近明显扩大到公共部门的研究。大规模调查和案例研究仍然是主要的研究方法,其中分析单位通常是“公司”或“项目”。研究结果还表明,在过去,该领域是如何被采购如何促进不同类型的创新项目的问题所驱动的,寻求得出实际影响,很少对所应用的理论做出明确的陈述;这仍然是许多研究的特点,但我们发现越来越多的关注理论发展。我们还看到了正在调查的技术创新类型的转变:过去的研究倾向于关注采购在新产品开发(NPD)项目中的作用,这反映了相对较低程度的技术不确定性,但我们看到了创新项目面临技术不确定性的趋势。研究表明,这需要新的采购创新方式,因此需要新的采购方式来促进创新采购。在此基础上,我们对未来的研究方向提出了指导:1)开展更多关于公共部门创新采购的研究;2)考虑新的理论和研究方法,3)超越公司层面或二元分析来研究网络和生态系统。最后,我们将介绍STF中的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
18.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management is to publish original, high-quality research within the field of purchasing and supply management (PSM). Articles should have a significant impact on PSM theory and practice. The Journal ensures that high quality research is collected and disseminated widely to both academics and practitioners, and provides a forum for debate. It covers all subjects relating to the purchase and supply of goods and services in industry, commerce, local, national, and regional government, health and transportation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Improving supplier diversity and inclusion in supply chains Editorial Board From checking the box to driving impact – Perspectives on how to develop a supplier diversity program that is less narrowly scoped and more wholeheartedly adopted The circular business models of third-party loop operators: An activity-based view on performing activities internally or externally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1