Quality in rail timetabling - A detailed review of stakeholders’ interests compared with current practices in Germany

IF 2.7 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jrtpm.2021.100282
Wiebke Lenze, Nils Nießen
{"title":"Quality in rail timetabling - A detailed review of stakeholders’ interests compared with current practices in Germany","authors":"Wiebke Lenze,&nbsp;Nils Nießen","doi":"10.1016/j.jrtpm.2021.100282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quality is a commonly used term when evaluating offered services and is generally defined by its impact on stakeholders. For rail timetabling, however, no definition of quality exists as clear parameters for its measurement have not yet been established. High-quality timetables, which are essential to improve rail operation, require equally addressing the partly contradictory interests of different stakeholders such as public authorities, infrastructure managers, railway undertakings, shippers, and passengers. This paper analyses stakeholders' expectations which define the quality of timetables and discusses their consideration in the timetabling process. While infrastructure managers focus on the feasibility of the constructed timetable and its capacity consumption, shippers and passengers are interested in attractive travel times<span>. After a detailed evaluation of the different stakeholders' interests, we analyse the current timetabling process and underlying regulations in Germany. Since this timetabling process focusses on feasibility and capacity, it lacks an equal integration of all stakeholders’ interests. Therefore, we propose specific parameters to use in an integrated timetabling process to create high-quality timetables and we identify further needs for action.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210970621000470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Quality is a commonly used term when evaluating offered services and is generally defined by its impact on stakeholders. For rail timetabling, however, no definition of quality exists as clear parameters for its measurement have not yet been established. High-quality timetables, which are essential to improve rail operation, require equally addressing the partly contradictory interests of different stakeholders such as public authorities, infrastructure managers, railway undertakings, shippers, and passengers. This paper analyses stakeholders' expectations which define the quality of timetables and discusses their consideration in the timetabling process. While infrastructure managers focus on the feasibility of the constructed timetable and its capacity consumption, shippers and passengers are interested in attractive travel times. After a detailed evaluation of the different stakeholders' interests, we analyse the current timetabling process and underlying regulations in Germany. Since this timetabling process focusses on feasibility and capacity, it lacks an equal integration of all stakeholders’ interests. Therefore, we propose specific parameters to use in an integrated timetabling process to create high-quality timetables and we identify further needs for action.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铁路时刻表的质量——与德国目前的做法相比,对利益相关者利益的详细审查
质量是评估所提供服务时常用的术语,通常由其对利益相关者的影响来定义。然而,对于铁路调度,由于尚未建立明确的测量参数,因此没有质量的定义。高质量的时刻表对于改善铁路运营至关重要,它要求平等地解决不同利益相关者(如公共当局、基础设施管理者、铁路企业、托运人和乘客)之间部分矛盾的利益。本文分析了决定时间表质量的利益相关者的期望,并讨论了他们在时间表制定过程中的考虑。当基础设施管理者关注构建时间表的可行性及其容量消耗时,托运人和乘客感兴趣的是有吸引力的旅行时间。在对不同利益相关者的利益进行详细评估后,我们分析了德国目前的时间表流程和基本法规。由于这个时间表过程侧重于可行性和能力,它缺乏对所有利益相关者利益的平等整合。因此,我们提出了具体参数,以便在综合时间表过程中使用,以创建高质量的时间表,并确定进一步的行动需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Train delay prediction for high-speed railway based on the SCM hybrid method Rolling stock management and railway efficiency: Evidence from a line-level analysis of regional rail services in France Editorial Board Reliability evaluation of rail freight transport processes — An agent-based approach combining microscopic rail simulation and freight network logistics WildlifeRailGuard: A novel conservation technology to mitigate train-animal collisions in forest regions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1