A comparative study of the scabicidal activities of formulations of essential oil of Lippia multiflora Moldenke and benzyl benzoate emulsion BP

F.A. Oladimeji , L.O. Orafidiya , T.A.B. Ogunniyi , T.A. Adewunmi , O. Onayemi
{"title":"A comparative study of the scabicidal activities of formulations of essential oil of Lippia multiflora Moldenke and benzyl benzoate emulsion BP","authors":"F.A. Oladimeji ,&nbsp;L.O. Orafidiya ,&nbsp;T.A.B. Ogunniyi ,&nbsp;T.A. Adewunmi ,&nbsp;O. Onayemi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijat.2005.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The scabicidal activities of two topical emulsion formulations (<span><em>Lippia</em></span> oil emulsions A and B), each containing 20% w/w essential oil of <em>Lippia multiflora</em> (<em>Lippia</em><span> oil), were compared with that of benzyl benzoate emulsion BP using randomized, double blind and group parallel studies. The percentage cure obtained for </span><em>Lippia</em> oil emulsion A were 50%, 80% and 80% on application for 3, 5 and 7 days, respectively, compared with 30%, 60% and 70% obtained for benzyl benzoate emulsion BP for the same treatment periods. There was no significant difference between the percentages of scabietic subjects cured with the two formulations (A and B) of <em>Lippia</em> oil (<em>P</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.05). Six adverse effects were reported for the <em>Lippia</em> oil emulsions, while 10 adverse effects were reported for benzyl benzoate emulsion BP. Since the <em>Lippia</em><span> oil emulsions were more effective and better tolerated than the benzyl benzoate emulsion, they were considered as additional formulations for the treatment of scabies.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100691,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Aromatherapy","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 87-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijat.2005.03.005","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Aromatherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962456205000160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The scabicidal activities of two topical emulsion formulations (Lippia oil emulsions A and B), each containing 20% w/w essential oil of Lippia multiflora (Lippia oil), were compared with that of benzyl benzoate emulsion BP using randomized, double blind and group parallel studies. The percentage cure obtained for Lippia oil emulsion A were 50%, 80% and 80% on application for 3, 5 and 7 days, respectively, compared with 30%, 60% and 70% obtained for benzyl benzoate emulsion BP for the same treatment periods. There was no significant difference between the percentages of scabietic subjects cured with the two formulations (A and B) of Lippia oil (P > 0.05). Six adverse effects were reported for the Lippia oil emulsions, while 10 adverse effects were reported for benzyl benzoate emulsion BP. Since the Lippia oil emulsions were more effective and better tolerated than the benzyl benzoate emulsion, they were considered as additional formulations for the treatment of scabies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
何首乌精油与苯甲酸苄酯乳剂BP的杀癣活性比较研究
采用随机、双盲和组平行研究的方法,比较了两种外用乳剂(Lippia oil乳剂A和B)的杀疥疮活性,每种乳剂含有20% w/w的Lippia精油(Lippia oil)。Lippia油乳剂A在施用3、5和7 d时的固化率分别为50%、80%和80%,而苯甲酯乳剂BP在相同的处理时间内的固化率分别为30%、60%和70%。两种配方(A、B)对疥疮患者的治愈率无显著差异(P >0.05)。利皮亚油乳剂有6例不良反应,苯甲酸苄酯乳剂BP有10例不良反应。由于Lippia油乳剂比苯甲酸苄酯乳剂更有效,耐受性更好,因此它们被认为是治疗疥疮的额外配方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Editorial Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1