Supratherapeutic utilization of paracetamol versus ibuprofen among <12-year-old children in primary care in Istanbul.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Family practice Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmad038
Dilara Bayram, Caner Vizdiklar, Volkan Aydin, Narin Akici, Omer Atac, Ahmet Akici
{"title":"Supratherapeutic utilization of paracetamol versus ibuprofen among <12-year-old children in primary care in Istanbul.","authors":"Dilara Bayram, Caner Vizdiklar, Volkan Aydin, Narin Akici, Omer Atac, Ahmet Akici","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmad038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paracetamol and ibuprofen are the most preferred analgesics for pain and fever management in children. Prescribing of these drugs in supratherapeutic doses may predispose to their toxicity. We aimed to compare prescribing patterns and potential overdosing of paracetamol and ibuprofen in primary care for <12-year-old children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed paracetamol- and ibuprofen-containing prescriptions (PCPs, n = 173,575 and ICPs, n = 145,655) of 1- to 11-year-old children, issued by 3:1 systematically sampled primary care physicians (n = 1,431) in Istanbul during 2016. We compared drug use parameters and prescriptions surpassing daily and single-use dose limits for paracetamol and ibuprofen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified that 29.9% of PCPs and 20.8% of ICPs were generated for those aged 1-2 years. Concomitant analgesic use was higher in ICPs than in PCPs (15.1% vs. 12.8%). We found that 4.4% of PCPs and 3.1% of ICPs exceeded maximum daily dose limit of paracetamol and ibuprofen, respectively (P < 0.001). This was more common in girls (5.1% and 3.3%, respectively) and at 1 year of age in both groups (9.2% and 8.5%, respectively). Single-use supratherapeutic dosing was encountered in 16.5% of PCPs and 13.2% of ICPs (P < 0.001, pessimistic model) and in 8.6% of PCPs and 10.6% of ICPs (P < 0.001, optimistic model).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Paracetamol and ibuprofen were generally used in primary care for similar clinical conditions with subtle differences. However, more pronounced in younger children and girls, potential overdosing seems to be more practiced for paracetamol than ibuprofen both in terms of maximal daily and single-use setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmad038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Paracetamol and ibuprofen are the most preferred analgesics for pain and fever management in children. Prescribing of these drugs in supratherapeutic doses may predispose to their toxicity. We aimed to compare prescribing patterns and potential overdosing of paracetamol and ibuprofen in primary care for <12-year-old children.

Methods: We analysed paracetamol- and ibuprofen-containing prescriptions (PCPs, n = 173,575 and ICPs, n = 145,655) of 1- to 11-year-old children, issued by 3:1 systematically sampled primary care physicians (n = 1,431) in Istanbul during 2016. We compared drug use parameters and prescriptions surpassing daily and single-use dose limits for paracetamol and ibuprofen.

Results: We identified that 29.9% of PCPs and 20.8% of ICPs were generated for those aged 1-2 years. Concomitant analgesic use was higher in ICPs than in PCPs (15.1% vs. 12.8%). We found that 4.4% of PCPs and 3.1% of ICPs exceeded maximum daily dose limit of paracetamol and ibuprofen, respectively (P < 0.001). This was more common in girls (5.1% and 3.3%, respectively) and at 1 year of age in both groups (9.2% and 8.5%, respectively). Single-use supratherapeutic dosing was encountered in 16.5% of PCPs and 13.2% of ICPs (P < 0.001, pessimistic model) and in 8.6% of PCPs and 10.6% of ICPs (P < 0.001, optimistic model).

Conclusions: Paracetamol and ibuprofen were generally used in primary care for similar clinical conditions with subtle differences. However, more pronounced in younger children and girls, potential overdosing seems to be more practiced for paracetamol than ibuprofen both in terms of maximal daily and single-use setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯坦布尔基层医疗机构中 12 岁以下儿童对扑热息痛和布洛芬的超疗效使用情况。
背景:扑热息痛和布洛芬是治疗儿童疼痛和发烧的首选镇痛药。开具超治疗剂量的处方可能会导致这些药物的毒性。我们的目的是比较初级保健中扑热息痛和布洛芬的处方模式和可能的过量用药情况:我们分析了伊斯坦布尔 3:1 系统抽样初级保健医生(n = 1,431 人)在 2016 年为 1-11 岁儿童开具的含有扑热息痛和布洛芬的处方(PCPs,n = 173,575 份;ICPs,n = 145,655 份)。我们比较了药物使用参数以及超过扑热息痛和布洛芬每日和单次使用剂量限制的处方:我们发现,29.9% 的 PCP 和 20.8% 的 ICP 是为 1-2 岁儿童开具的。在 ICP 中,同时使用镇痛药的比例高于 PCP(15.1% 对 12.8%)。我们发现,4.4% 的初级保健中心和 3.1% 的综合保健中心分别超过了扑热息痛和布洛芬的每日最大剂量限制(P < 0.001)。这种情况在女孩中更为常见(分别为 5.1%和 3.3%),在两组 1 岁儿童中也更为常见(分别为 9.2%和 8.5%)。16.5%的初级保健医生和13.2%的综合保健医生(P<0.001,悲观模型)以及8.6%的初级保健医生和10.6%的综合保健医生(P<0.001,乐观模型)使用了一次性超剂量治疗:结论:在初级保健中,扑热息痛和布洛芬一般用于类似的临床症状,两者之间存在细微差别。然而,在年龄较小的儿童和女孩中,扑热息痛的潜在用药过量似乎比布洛芬更明显,无论是从每日最大用药量还是从单次用药量来看都是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Impact of implementing primary care-based medication for opioid use disorder on provider and staff perceptions. The effect and implementation of the COVID Box, a remote patient monitoring system for patients with a COVID-19 infection in primary care: a matched cohort study. Can patient education initiatives in primary care increase patient knowledge of appropriate antibiotic use and decrease expectations for unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions? Clinical effects of accreditation in general practice: a pragmatic randomized controlled study. School absence policy and healthcare use: a difference-in-difference cohort analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1