Relationship of Aboriginal family wellbeing to social and cultural determinants, Central Australia: 'Waltja tjutangku nyakunytjaku'.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1136/fmch-2022-001741
Alyson Wright, Vanessa Napaltjarri Davis, Makayla-May Brinckley, Raymond Lovett, Joanne Thandrayen, Mandy Yap, William Sanders, Emily Banks
{"title":"Relationship of Aboriginal family wellbeing to social and cultural determinants, Central Australia: 'Waltja tjutangku nyakunytjaku'.","authors":"Alyson Wright, Vanessa Napaltjarri Davis, Makayla-May Brinckley, Raymond Lovett, Joanne Thandrayen, Mandy Yap, William Sanders, Emily Banks","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2022-001741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to apply a strength-based approach to examine the relation of cultural and social determinants to high family functioning for Aboriginal people in Central Australia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study involving a quantitative analysis of survey data. Prevalence rate ratios (PRs) and 95% CIs were calculated from binomial regressions, adjusted for gender and age. Qualitative data from workshops with Aboriginal leaders in Central Australia supported the interpretation of the research findings.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study involved 639 Aboriginal people in Central Australia who participated in the Mayi Kuwayu Study.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Overall, 57.9% (370/639) of participants reported high/very high family functioning, 16.9% (108/639) reported moderate and 13.3% (85/639) reported low. The adjusted prevalence of family functioning was similar across gender, age groups and household sizes. Family functioning was associated with lower family financial status (aPR=0.74, 95% CI=0.60 to 0.91) and receiving welfare (0.88, 0.77 to 1.00). Family functioning was greater with high community cohesion (2.72, 1.68 to 4.39), high individual agency in community (2.15, 1.63 to 2.85); having an Aboriginal language as a first language (1.20, 1.04 to 1.37); speaking your Aboriginal language a lot (1.37, 1.12 to 1.68); high exposure to cultural practice and knowledge (1.45, 1.28 to 1.65); and multigenerational or extended family households (1.19, 1.02 to 1.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High family functioning is a strength in Central Australia and is intrinsically connected with culture. Healthcare providers and programmes that build on the foundations of culture and family are an important approach to improving wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/18/7c/fmch-2022-001741.PMC9660685.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2022-001741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to apply a strength-based approach to examine the relation of cultural and social determinants to high family functioning for Aboriginal people in Central Australia.

Design: Cross-sectional study involving a quantitative analysis of survey data. Prevalence rate ratios (PRs) and 95% CIs were calculated from binomial regressions, adjusted for gender and age. Qualitative data from workshops with Aboriginal leaders in Central Australia supported the interpretation of the research findings.

Participants: The study involved 639 Aboriginal people in Central Australia who participated in the Mayi Kuwayu Study.

Result: Overall, 57.9% (370/639) of participants reported high/very high family functioning, 16.9% (108/639) reported moderate and 13.3% (85/639) reported low. The adjusted prevalence of family functioning was similar across gender, age groups and household sizes. Family functioning was associated with lower family financial status (aPR=0.74, 95% CI=0.60 to 0.91) and receiving welfare (0.88, 0.77 to 1.00). Family functioning was greater with high community cohesion (2.72, 1.68 to 4.39), high individual agency in community (2.15, 1.63 to 2.85); having an Aboriginal language as a first language (1.20, 1.04 to 1.37); speaking your Aboriginal language a lot (1.37, 1.12 to 1.68); high exposure to cultural practice and knowledge (1.45, 1.28 to 1.65); and multigenerational or extended family households (1.19, 1.02 to 1.38).

Conclusion: High family functioning is a strength in Central Australia and is intrinsically connected with culture. Healthcare providers and programmes that build on the foundations of culture and family are an important approach to improving wellbeing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土著家庭幸福与社会和文化决定因素的关系,澳大利亚中部:“Waltja tjutangku nyakunytjaku”。
目的:本研究的目的是应用一种基于力量的方法来检查文化和社会决定因素与澳大利亚中部土著人高家庭功能的关系。设计:横断面研究,对调查数据进行定量分析。患病率比(pr)和95% ci根据二项回归计算,并根据性别和年龄进行调整。来自澳大利亚中部土著领导人讲习班的定性数据支持了对研究结果的解释。参与者:这项研究涉及639名澳大利亚中部的土著人,他们参加了Mayi Kuwayu研究。结果:总体而言,57.9%(370/639)的参与者报告高/非常高的家庭功能,16.9%(108/639)报告中度,13.3%(85/639)报告低。调整后的家庭功能患病率在性别、年龄组和家庭规模上是相似的。家庭功能与较低的家庭经济状况(aPR=0.74, 95% CI=0.60 ~ 0.91)和接受福利(0.88,0.77 ~ 1.00)相关。社区凝聚力高(2.72,1.68 ~ 4.39),社区个体能动性高(2.15,1.63 ~ 2.85);以土著语言为第一语言(1.20,1.04至1.37);经常说母语(1.37,1.12到1.68);高度接触文化实践和知识(1.45,1.28至1.65);多代同堂或大家庭(1.19,1.02 - 1.38)。结论:高家庭功能是澳大利亚中部的一个优势,它与文化有着内在的联系。以文化和家庭为基础的医疗保健提供者和方案是改善福祉的重要途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
期刊最新文献
The role of the primary healthcare research community in addressing the social and structural determinants of health: a call to action from NAPCRG 2023. Identification of research gaps to improve care for healthy ageing: a scoping review. Temporal trends and practice variation of paediatric diagnostic tests in primary care: retrospective analysis of 14 million tests. General practice trainee, supervisor and educator perspectives on the transitions in postgraduate training: a scoping review. Reducing strain on primary healthcare systems through innovative models of care: the impact of direct access physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions-an interrupted time series analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1