Increased airway resistance among exclusive waterpipe smokers detected using impulse oscillometry.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-25 DOI:10.4103/atm.atm_165_22
Hassan A Chami, Nourhan Houjeij, Maha Makki, Lina Itani, Hani Tamim, Ahmad Al Mulla, Bartolome Celli, Salah Zeineldine
{"title":"Increased airway resistance among exclusive waterpipe smokers detected using impulse oscillometry.","authors":"Hassan A Chami,&nbsp;Nourhan Houjeij,&nbsp;Maha Makki,&nbsp;Lina Itani,&nbsp;Hani Tamim,&nbsp;Ahmad Al Mulla,&nbsp;Bartolome Celli,&nbsp;Salah Zeineldine","doi":"10.4103/atm.atm_165_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Waterpipe smoking is increasing in popularity, yet the evidence implicating waterpipe smoking in lung disease is limited. We hypothesized that impulse oscillometry (IOS) would detect airway abnormalities in waterpipe smokers (WPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 210 participants, 40 years or older, from the community, of whom 92 were exclusive WPS and 118 were never-smokers. Waterpipe smoking history was assessed using a validated questionnaire. All participants underwent spirometry, and IOS and absolute and percentage predicted results (for age, sex, height, and weight) were compared between WPS and nonsmokers. The association of IOS parameters with waterpipe smoking duration and extent (waterpipe smoked/day * smoking duration) was evaluated using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WPS smoked on average 1.8 ± 1.2 waterpipes/day, over an average duration of 23.3 ± 39.8 years. WPS and nonsmokers were largely asymptomatic and had similar age, body mass index, sex distribution, and spirometric values. Nevertheless, WPS had higher IOS measured resistance at 5Hz compared to nonsmokers, (0.53 ± 0.2 vs. 0.48 ± 0.2 kPa/L/s, <i>P</i> = 0.03) and higher percentage-predicted resistance (124.5 ± 36.3 vs. 115.7% ± 35.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). Waterpipe smoking duration was also associated with resistance (β = 0.04 kPa/L/s/year, <i>P</i> = 0.01) and with percentage-predicted resistance (β = 0.05/year, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Waterpipe smoking extent was associated with resistance (β = 0.009 kPa/L/s/waterpipe-year, <i>P</i> = 0.04), while the association with percentage-predicted resistance was near significance (β = 0.009/waterpipe-year, <i>P</i> = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Waterpipe smoking is associated with increased airway resistance assessed by IOS but not by spirometry in largely asymptomatic individuals from the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":50760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7e/9c/ATM-18-23.PMC10034824.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_165_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Waterpipe smoking is increasing in popularity, yet the evidence implicating waterpipe smoking in lung disease is limited. We hypothesized that impulse oscillometry (IOS) would detect airway abnormalities in waterpipe smokers (WPS).

Methods: We studied 210 participants, 40 years or older, from the community, of whom 92 were exclusive WPS and 118 were never-smokers. Waterpipe smoking history was assessed using a validated questionnaire. All participants underwent spirometry, and IOS and absolute and percentage predicted results (for age, sex, height, and weight) were compared between WPS and nonsmokers. The association of IOS parameters with waterpipe smoking duration and extent (waterpipe smoked/day * smoking duration) was evaluated using linear regression.

Results: WPS smoked on average 1.8 ± 1.2 waterpipes/day, over an average duration of 23.3 ± 39.8 years. WPS and nonsmokers were largely asymptomatic and had similar age, body mass index, sex distribution, and spirometric values. Nevertheless, WPS had higher IOS measured resistance at 5Hz compared to nonsmokers, (0.53 ± 0.2 vs. 0.48 ± 0.2 kPa/L/s, P = 0.03) and higher percentage-predicted resistance (124.5 ± 36.3 vs. 115.7% ± 35.6%, P = 0.04). Waterpipe smoking duration was also associated with resistance (β = 0.04 kPa/L/s/year, P = 0.01) and with percentage-predicted resistance (β = 0.05/year, P = 0.02). Waterpipe smoking extent was associated with resistance (β = 0.009 kPa/L/s/waterpipe-year, P = 0.04), while the association with percentage-predicted resistance was near significance (β = 0.009/waterpipe-year, P = 0.07).

Conclusions: Waterpipe smoking is associated with increased airway resistance assessed by IOS but not by spirometry in largely asymptomatic individuals from the community.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用脉冲示波法检测到纯水烟吸烟者的气道阻力增加。
引言:水烟越来越受欢迎,但水烟与肺部疾病有关的证据有限。我们假设脉冲示波法(IOS)可以检测水管吸烟者(WPS)的气道异常。方法:我们研究了来自社区的210名40岁或以上的参与者,其中92人是专门的WPS,118人从不吸烟。使用经验证的问卷对水烟管吸烟史进行评估。所有参与者都接受了肺活量测定,并比较WPS和非吸烟者的IOS以及绝对和百分比预测结果(年龄、性别、身高和体重)。使用线性回归评估IOS参数与水烟管吸烟持续时间和程度(水烟管/天*吸烟持续时间)的相关性。结果:WPS平均每天抽1.8±1.2根水管,平均持续时间为23.3±39.8年。WPS和非吸烟者大多无症状,年龄、体重指数、性别分布和肺活量测定值相似。然而WPS在5Hz下具有比不吸烟者更高的IOS测量电阻,(0.53±0.2 vs.0.48±0.2 kPa/L/s,P=0.03)和较高的预测阻力百分比(124.5±36.3 vs.115.7%±35.6%,P=0.04)。水烟持续时间也与阻力相关(β=0.04 kPa/L/s/年,P=0.01)和预测阻力百分比相关(β0.05/年,P=0.02)(β=0.009 kPa/L/s/水管道年,P=0.04),而与预测阻力百分比的相关性接近显著(β=0.009/水管道每年,P=0.07)。结论:在社区中大部分无症状的个体中,水管道吸烟与IOS评估的气道阻力增加有关,但与肺活量测量无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Annals of Thoracic Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of chest medicine, such as adult and pediatrics pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care medicine, respiratory care, transplantation, sleep medicine, related basic medical sciences, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review , and more. Editorials and communications to the editor that explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with chest medicine.
期刊最新文献
Continuous positive airway pressure combined with small-tidal-volume ventilation on arterial oxygenation and pulmonary shunt during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A randomized, controlled study Cost-effective in-house COVID-19 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing with yeast-derived Taq polymerase Surgical management of acquired benign tracheoesophageal fistula: Technical aspects and suggestions Association between healthy lifestyles and post-COVID-19 syndrome among college students Prolonged viral shedding following COVID-19 infection in a rheumatoid patient on rituximab treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1