Evaluation of the intaglio surface trueness and fit of zirconia crowns fabricated using different machining strategies with a chairside CAD/CAM system.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Computerized Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.3290/j.ijcd.b3840499
Jae-Hoon Kim, Hyeonjong Lee, Sung-Ae Son, Seoung-Jin Hong, Jeong-Kil Park
{"title":"Evaluation of the intaglio surface trueness and fit of zirconia crowns fabricated using different machining strategies with a chairside CAD/CAM system.","authors":"Jae-Hoon Kim, Hyeonjong Lee, Sung-Ae Son, Seoung-Jin Hong, Jeong-Kil Park","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b3840499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study aimed to evaluate the intaglio surface trueness and fit of zirconia crowns depending on the different machining strategies used with the Cerec system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty duplicate tooth models for a single zirconia crown were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10) according to the machining mode used for fabrication: grinding, wet milling, and dry milling. The scan data of the final crowns were compared with their design data to evaluate the intaglio surface trueness. The marginal and internal fit were evaluated using a cross-sectional method. The time required for the machining and sintering processes was measured for each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The wet-milling group showed better trueness (root mean square: 13.8 ± 1.0 μm) than the grinding and dry-milling groups (P < 0.001). The marginal gap was greater in the grinding group (58.6 ± 28.9 μm) than that in the wet- and dry-milling groups (P < 0.001). The dry-milling group required the shortest time for the manufacturing process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All machining modes fabricated crowns with a clinically acceptable trueness and fit. However, the dry-milling mode was advantageous for the chairside CAD/CAM system with respect to time efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"191-198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b3840499","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the intaglio surface trueness and fit of zirconia crowns depending on the different machining strategies used with the Cerec system.

Materials and methods: Thirty duplicate tooth models for a single zirconia crown were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10) according to the machining mode used for fabrication: grinding, wet milling, and dry milling. The scan data of the final crowns were compared with their design data to evaluate the intaglio surface trueness. The marginal and internal fit were evaluated using a cross-sectional method. The time required for the machining and sintering processes was measured for each group.

Results: The wet-milling group showed better trueness (root mean square: 13.8 ± 1.0 μm) than the grinding and dry-milling groups (P < 0.001). The marginal gap was greater in the grinding group (58.6 ± 28.9 μm) than that in the wet- and dry-milling groups (P < 0.001). The dry-milling group required the shortest time for the manufacturing process.

Conclusion: All machining modes fabricated crowns with a clinically acceptable trueness and fit. However, the dry-milling mode was advantageous for the chairside CAD/CAM system with respect to time efficiency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用椅旁 CAD/CAM 系统,评估采用不同加工策略制作的氧化锆牙冠的凹槽内表面真实性和密合性。
目的:本研究旨在根据 CEREC 系统使用的不同加工策略,评估氧化锆牙冠的凹面真实性和密合性:根据磨削、湿磨和干磨的加工模式,将单个氧化锆冠的 30 个重复牙齿模型随机分配到三组(n = 10)。将最终牙冠的扫描数据与其设计数据进行比较,以评估凹面的表面真实性。使用横截面法对边缘和内部配合进行了评估。测量了每组加工和烧结过程所需的时间:结果:湿铣组比磨削组和干铣组显示出更好的真实度(均方根值,13.8 ± 1.0 μm)(p < 0.001)。磨削组的边缘间隙(58.6 ± 28.9 μm)大于湿磨和干磨组(p < 0.001)。结论:所有加工模式都能制作出牙冠:结论:所有的加工模式都能制作出临床上可接受的真实度和密合度的牙冠。结论:所有加工模式都能制作出临床上可接受的真实度和密合度的牙冠,但就时间效率而言,干磨模式对椅旁 CAD/CAM 系统更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Digital Manufacturing Methods on the Accuracy of Ceramic Crowns. Accuracy of imaging software usable in clinical settings for 3D rendering of tooth structures. Digital workflow in oral splint manufacturing. Deep learning for diagnostic charting on pediatric panoramic radiographs. Preformed customized healing abutments in a biologically oriented preparation technique procedure: a 3-year retrospective case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1