Interventional pain physician beliefs on climate change: A Spine Intervention Society (SIS) survey

Alexandra E. Fogarty , Maya Godambe , Belinda Duszynski , Zachary L. McCormick , Joe Steensma , Gregory Decker
{"title":"Interventional pain physician beliefs on climate change: A Spine Intervention Society (SIS) survey","authors":"Alexandra E. Fogarty ,&nbsp;Maya Godambe ,&nbsp;Belinda Duszynski ,&nbsp;Zachary L. McCormick ,&nbsp;Joe Steensma ,&nbsp;Gregory Decker","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Summary of background data</h3><p>Although evaluated within other specialties, physicians’ beliefs towards climate change and human health have not been described within Interventional Pain Medicine (IPM). Understanding belief systems is essential for developing solutions to build sustainable practices.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assess beliefs toward climate change within the field of IPM.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Spine Intervention Society (SIS) members were invited to participate in an anonymous RedCap survey by email, social media, and advertisement at the 2022 SIS Annual Meeting. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and associations were estimated using Chi-Square (significance: p &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred and seventy-five participants responded to the survey. Participants most often identified as white (66 %; 95 % CI 57–73 %), male (78 %; 95 % CI 71–84 %), and from the United States (US) (76 %; CI 95 % 58–72 %), with 87 % (n = 123/141; 95 % CI 82–93 %) agreeing that climate change is happening (agree or strongly agree). While 78 % (95 % CI 80–92 %) agree that climate change and sustainability are important to them, only 47 % (95 % CI 34–51 %) agree that these are important to their patients. Those beliefs did not differ by age or geographical area (p &gt; 0.05). However, physicians in non-leadership positions are more likely to disagree or strongly disagree that climate change is important to them (χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 15.98; p &lt; 0.05), to their patients (χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 17.21; p &lt; 0.05), or that societies should advocate for climate policies (χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 9.19; p &lt; 0.05). Non-US physicians were more likely to believe that physicians have responsibilities to bring awareness to the health effects of climate change (χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 6.58; p &lt; 0.05) and to agree that climate change is important to their patients (χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 10.50; p &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion/conclusion</h3><p>Understanding specialty-specific physician views on climate change is essential for developing solutions to reduce the carbon footprint of medical practice and improve sustainability. The majority of SIS members believe that climate change is happening. Non-US physicians and physician-leaders are more likely to believe that climate change impacts their patients and that societies should advocate for climate policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277259442300119X/pdfft?md5=c262c1808fb62ab2f12d9b3958991f2b&pid=1-s2.0-S277259442300119X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277259442300119X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary of background data

Although evaluated within other specialties, physicians’ beliefs towards climate change and human health have not been described within Interventional Pain Medicine (IPM). Understanding belief systems is essential for developing solutions to build sustainable practices.

Objectives

Assess beliefs toward climate change within the field of IPM.

Methods

Spine Intervention Society (SIS) members were invited to participate in an anonymous RedCap survey by email, social media, and advertisement at the 2022 SIS Annual Meeting. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and associations were estimated using Chi-Square (significance: p < 0.05).

Results

One hundred and seventy-five participants responded to the survey. Participants most often identified as white (66 %; 95 % CI 57–73 %), male (78 %; 95 % CI 71–84 %), and from the United States (US) (76 %; CI 95 % 58–72 %), with 87 % (n = 123/141; 95 % CI 82–93 %) agreeing that climate change is happening (agree or strongly agree). While 78 % (95 % CI 80–92 %) agree that climate change and sustainability are important to them, only 47 % (95 % CI 34–51 %) agree that these are important to their patients. Those beliefs did not differ by age or geographical area (p > 0.05). However, physicians in non-leadership positions are more likely to disagree or strongly disagree that climate change is important to them (χ2(2) = 15.98; p < 0.05), to their patients (χ2(2) = 17.21; p < 0.05), or that societies should advocate for climate policies (χ2(2) = 9.19; p < 0.05). Non-US physicians were more likely to believe that physicians have responsibilities to bring awareness to the health effects of climate change (χ2(2) = 6.58; p < 0.05) and to agree that climate change is important to their patients (χ2(2) = 10.50; p < 0.05).

Discussion/conclusion

Understanding specialty-specific physician views on climate change is essential for developing solutions to reduce the carbon footprint of medical practice and improve sustainability. The majority of SIS members believe that climate change is happening. Non-US physicians and physician-leaders are more likely to believe that climate change impacts their patients and that societies should advocate for climate policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介入疼痛医生对气候变化的看法:一项脊柱干预学会(SIS)调查
虽然在其他专业中进行了评估,但在介入性疼痛医学(IPM)中尚未描述医生对气候变化和人类健康的看法。了解信仰体系对于制定可持续实践的解决方案至关重要。目的评估IPM领域对气候变化的看法。方法通过电子邮件、社交媒体和2022年SIS年会上的广告,邀请脊柱干预学会(SIS)成员参加RedCap的匿名调查。计算描述性统计量,并使用卡方估计相关性(显著性:p <0.05)。结果175名参与者回应了调查。参与者最常被认为是白人(66%;95% CI 57 - 73%),男性(78%;95% CI 71 - 84%),美国(US) (76%;CI 95% - 58 - 72%),其中87% (n = 123/141;95% CI 82 - 93%)同意气候变化正在发生(同意或强烈同意)。虽然78% (95% CI 80 - 92%)认为气候变化和可持续性对他们很重要,但只有47% (95% CI 34 - 51%)认为这些对他们的病人很重要。这些信念并不因年龄或地理区域而异(p >0.05)。然而,非领导职位的医生更有可能不同意或强烈不同意气候变化对他们很重要(χ2(2) = 15.98;p & lt;0.05),差异有统计学意义(χ2(2) = 17.21;p & lt;0.05),或者社会应该倡导气候政策(χ2(2) = 9.19;p & lt;0.05)。非美国医生更有可能认为医生有责任提高人们对气候变化对健康影响的认识(χ2(2) = 6.58;p & lt;0.05),并同意气候变化对患者很重要(χ2(2) = 10.50;p & lt;0.05)。讨论/结论了解专科医生对气候变化的看法对于制定减少医疗实践碳足迹和提高可持续性的解决方案至关重要。大多数SIS成员认为气候变化正在发生。非美国的医生和医生领导更有可能相信气候变化会影响他们的病人,社会应该倡导气候政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reddit users' perspectives on radiofrequency ablation: A data analysis. Intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation: A 5-year pooled analysis from three prospective clinical trials. Evaluating the effectiveness of interlaminar epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy using PROMIS as an outcome measure. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Postherpetic neuralgia mimicking lumbar radiculopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1