Les préjudices professionnels des jeunes victimes de dommages corporels. Partie 3 : Les difficultés liées à l’évaluation de l’incidence professionnelle
D. Lizano (Avocat – DU réparation juridique du dommage corporel) , C. Rougé-Maillart (Professeur des universités en médecine légale et droit de la santé) , R. Clément (Maître de conférence en médecine légale et droit de la santé)
{"title":"Les préjudices professionnels des jeunes victimes de dommages corporels. Partie 3 : Les difficultés liées à l’évaluation de l’incidence professionnelle","authors":"D. Lizano (Avocat – DU réparation juridique du dommage corporel) , C. Rougé-Maillart (Professeur des universités en médecine légale et droit de la santé) , R. Clément (Maître de conférence en médecine légale et droit de la santé)","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2022.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Though professional damages in respect of young personal injury victims are recognized in principle by the Dintilhac group, and confirmed by the Court of Cassation in terms of full compensation for damages suffered, the assessment of such professional damages remains difficult, and the source of myriad legal disputes. The recognition and assessment of professional incidence raises the question of the risk of double compensation: The cumulative award of lifetime compensation for lost future earnings and of compensation for professional incidence not recognized at first by the 2nd chamber of the Court of Cassation is a source of debate in terms of both doctrine and jurisprudence. Though a source of discussion, the cumulative award of compensation for professional incidence and for educational, academic or training damages (PSUF) is more consensual.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2022 174","pages":"Pages 53-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739122000379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Though professional damages in respect of young personal injury victims are recognized in principle by the Dintilhac group, and confirmed by the Court of Cassation in terms of full compensation for damages suffered, the assessment of such professional damages remains difficult, and the source of myriad legal disputes. The recognition and assessment of professional incidence raises the question of the risk of double compensation: The cumulative award of lifetime compensation for lost future earnings and of compensation for professional incidence not recognized at first by the 2nd chamber of the Court of Cassation is a source of debate in terms of both doctrine and jurisprudence. Though a source of discussion, the cumulative award of compensation for professional incidence and for educational, academic or training damages (PSUF) is more consensual.
期刊介绍:
The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues