Les préjudices professionnels des jeunes victimes de dommages corporels. Partie 2 : Les difficultés liées à l’évaluation des pertes de gains professionnels

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL Medecine & Droit Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.meddro.2022.03.002
D. Lizano (Avocat – DU réparation juridique du dommage corporel) , C. Rougé-Maillart (Professeur des universités en médecine légale et droit de la santé) , R. Clément (Maître de conférence en médecine légale et droit de la santé))
{"title":"Les préjudices professionnels des jeunes victimes de dommages corporels. Partie 2 : Les difficultés liées à l’évaluation des pertes de gains professionnels","authors":"D. Lizano (Avocat – DU réparation juridique du dommage corporel) ,&nbsp;C. Rougé-Maillart (Professeur des universités en médecine légale et droit de la santé) ,&nbsp;R. Clément (Maître de conférence en médecine légale et droit de la santé))","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2022.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Though professional damages in respect of young personal injury victims are recognized in principle by the Dintilhac group, and confirmed by the Court of Cassation in terms of full compensation for damages suffered, the assessment of such professional damages remains difficult, and the source of myriad legal disputes. Assessment of lost future earnings requires a specific approach: As regards the benchmark salary, judges base this on the average or median salary in France, taking into account the social and family environment which may represent a loss of opportunity. The jurisprudence recognizes that the permanent incapacity of the victim entitles them to lifetime compensation, mostly in the form of an annuity. However, while the civil judge considers that the payment of an allowance for disabled adults (AAH) or an educational allowance for disabled children (AEEH) does not interfere with the calculation of lost professional earnings, the administrative judge takes the opposite stance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2022 174","pages":"Pages 48-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739122000380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though professional damages in respect of young personal injury victims are recognized in principle by the Dintilhac group, and confirmed by the Court of Cassation in terms of full compensation for damages suffered, the assessment of such professional damages remains difficult, and the source of myriad legal disputes. Assessment of lost future earnings requires a specific approach: As regards the benchmark salary, judges base this on the average or median salary in France, taking into account the social and family environment which may represent a loss of opportunity. The jurisprudence recognizes that the permanent incapacity of the victim entitles them to lifetime compensation, mostly in the form of an annuity. However, while the civil judge considers that the payment of an allowance for disabled adults (AAH) or an educational allowance for disabled children (AEEH) does not interfere with the calculation of lost professional earnings, the administrative judge takes the opposite stance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对年轻身体伤害受害者的职业伤害。第二部分:评估职业收入损失的困难
尽管Dintilhac小组原则上承认对年轻人身伤害受害者的专业损害赔偿,并由最高上诉法院确认对所遭受的损害给予全额赔偿,但对这种专业损害赔偿的评估仍然很困难,也是无数法律纠纷的根源。评估失去的未来收入需要采取具体办法:关于基准工资,法官以法国的平均工资或中位数工资为基础,同时考虑到可能代表失去机会的社会和家庭环境。判例承认,受害人的永久丧失行为能力使他们有权获得终身赔偿,主要以年金的形式。然而,民事法官认为,支付残疾成人津贴(AAH)或残疾儿童教育津贴(AEEH)并不妨碍计算失去的职业收入,而行政法官则持相反的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medecine & Droit
Medecine & Droit MEDICINE, LEGAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues
期刊最新文献
Contents Contents Parcours de soins rénové, e-santé et maillage officinal : une réponse complexe à la pénurie de médecins Le concept de race : serpent de mer de la pratique médicale La loi du 10 mai 2024 contre les dérives sectaires : application dans le domaine de la santé : séparer le bon grain scientifique de l’ivraie charlatanesque
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1