Food aid and violent conflict: A review and Empiricist’s companion

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102542
Maximilian Koppenberg , Ashok K. Mishra , Stefan Hirsch
{"title":"Food aid and violent conflict: A review and Empiricist’s companion","authors":"Maximilian Koppenberg ,&nbsp;Ashok K. Mishra ,&nbsp;Stefan Hirsch","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food aid presents a core component of humanitarian support for people incapable of meeting basic human needs and aims to bolster food security. However, some studies suggest that food aid may cause violent conflicts in recipient countries, which has initiated a controversy regarding the impact of food aid on conflict in the political and scientific debate. We decompose the relationship between food aid and conflict into the channels through which food aid can affect conflict. We address questions of methodological choice and estimation techniques for empirical studies. Our review of the empirical evidence on the effect of food aid on conflict shows that none of the previous studies proposes a compelling identification strategy. While existing research shows promising approaches in terms of econometric methods, i.e., instrumental variables estimation, they have not succeeded in i) using instruments that pass the necessary tests of instrumental variable estimation and ii) identifying the channels through which food aid influences conflict. We argue that future work should contain a rigorous identification strategy with a stricter focus on the impact of food aid on conflict intensity, empirically examine the conceptual channels through which food aid affects conflict, and that there is the need for data at a more disaggregated level to achieve both objectives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919223001409/pdfft?md5=6030564abb8632b8ad43376f62ac7ee5&pid=1-s2.0-S0306919223001409-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919223001409","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food aid presents a core component of humanitarian support for people incapable of meeting basic human needs and aims to bolster food security. However, some studies suggest that food aid may cause violent conflicts in recipient countries, which has initiated a controversy regarding the impact of food aid on conflict in the political and scientific debate. We decompose the relationship between food aid and conflict into the channels through which food aid can affect conflict. We address questions of methodological choice and estimation techniques for empirical studies. Our review of the empirical evidence on the effect of food aid on conflict shows that none of the previous studies proposes a compelling identification strategy. While existing research shows promising approaches in terms of econometric methods, i.e., instrumental variables estimation, they have not succeeded in i) using instruments that pass the necessary tests of instrumental variable estimation and ii) identifying the channels through which food aid influences conflict. We argue that future work should contain a rigorous identification strategy with a stricter focus on the impact of food aid on conflict intensity, empirically examine the conceptual channels through which food aid affects conflict, and that there is the need for data at a more disaggregated level to achieve both objectives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粮食援助与暴力冲突:回顾与经验主义者的伴侣
粮食援助是向无法满足人类基本需求的人提供人道主义援助的核心组成部分,旨在加强粮食安全。然而,一些研究表明,粮食援助可能在受援国引发暴力冲突,这在政治和科学辩论中引发了关于粮食援助对冲突影响的争论。我们将粮食援助与冲突之间的关系分解为粮食援助可以影响冲突的渠道。我们解决的问题,方法选择和估计技术的实证研究。我们对粮食援助对冲突影响的经验证据的回顾表明,之前的研究都没有提出一个令人信服的识别策略。虽然现有的研究在计量经济学方法,即工具变量估计方面显示出有希望的方法,但它们未能成功地㈠使用通过工具变量估计必要测试的工具,以及㈡确定粮食援助影响冲突的渠道。我们认为,未来的工作应该包含一个严格的识别策略,更严格地关注粮食援助对冲突强度的影响,实证研究粮食援助影响冲突的概念渠道,并且需要在更细分的层面上获得数据,以实现这两个目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
期刊最新文献
Reflections on food policy in the context of healthy and sustainable diets The impact of pre-empting dual food quality regulation on product reformulation and packaging Autopsy of a futures market failure: Japan’s Dojima rice futures in the early 21st century Women improving nutrition through self-help groups in India: Does nutrition information help? Integrating system dynamics to value chain analysis to address price volatility in the Indonesian chilli value chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1