Organizing resilient infrastructure initiatives: A study on conceptualization, motivation, and operation of ten initiatives in the Netherlands

Yirang Lim , Johan Ninan , Sibout Nooteboom , Marcel Hertogh
{"title":"Organizing resilient infrastructure initiatives: A study on conceptualization, motivation, and operation of ten initiatives in the Netherlands","authors":"Yirang Lim ,&nbsp;Johan Ninan ,&nbsp;Sibout Nooteboom ,&nbsp;Marcel Hertogh","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Resilient infrastructure is critical to a sustainable and functioning society. Infrastructure management and (re)development are highly complex processes encompassing various stakeholders’ interests while they are pressured by the uncertainty of climate change and social transition. In response to these challenges, various resilience initiatives emerged with different motivations and approaches. The purpose of this research is to understand the interplay between motivations and organizational approaches as well as resilience conceptualization. This can provide insights into which domains of resilience have been focused on and what needs to be improved in their organizational approaches to realize motivations. This research specifically investigates ten resilient infrastructure initiatives in the Netherlands. By using scoping review and content analysis, our results highlight that resilience initiatives conceptualize resilience in different ways, mainly focusing on built and organizational resilience with a focus on long-term and wider geographic scope. Each initiative had several motivations, including 1) creating innovative solutions, 2) sharing knowledge, 3) promoting commitment and cooperation, and 4) promoting resilience. These motivations are reflected in the organizational approach. For example, there was a strong link between the motivation ‘creating shared knowledge’ and the organizational approach ‘research collaboration.’ Generic motivation such as ‘promoting resilience’ does not have one mainstreaming approach, which shows promoting resilience in practice is still in the exploration stage. This research provides major motivations and organizational approaches and their link within the resilient infrastructure initiatives which can contribute to better organizing similar initiatives aiming for resilient infrastructure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 120-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741623000492/pdfft?md5=7b9322c1c68beb6f899430f90cbd6dcf&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741623000492-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resilient Cities and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741623000492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resilient infrastructure is critical to a sustainable and functioning society. Infrastructure management and (re)development are highly complex processes encompassing various stakeholders’ interests while they are pressured by the uncertainty of climate change and social transition. In response to these challenges, various resilience initiatives emerged with different motivations and approaches. The purpose of this research is to understand the interplay between motivations and organizational approaches as well as resilience conceptualization. This can provide insights into which domains of resilience have been focused on and what needs to be improved in their organizational approaches to realize motivations. This research specifically investigates ten resilient infrastructure initiatives in the Netherlands. By using scoping review and content analysis, our results highlight that resilience initiatives conceptualize resilience in different ways, mainly focusing on built and organizational resilience with a focus on long-term and wider geographic scope. Each initiative had several motivations, including 1) creating innovative solutions, 2) sharing knowledge, 3) promoting commitment and cooperation, and 4) promoting resilience. These motivations are reflected in the organizational approach. For example, there was a strong link between the motivation ‘creating shared knowledge’ and the organizational approach ‘research collaboration.’ Generic motivation such as ‘promoting resilience’ does not have one mainstreaming approach, which shows promoting resilience in practice is still in the exploration stage. This research provides major motivations and organizational approaches and their link within the resilient infrastructure initiatives which can contribute to better organizing similar initiatives aiming for resilient infrastructure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织弹性基础设施计划:荷兰十项计划的概念化、动机和运作研究
弹性基础设施对于社会的可持续运转至关重要。基础设施管理和(再)开发是一个高度复杂的过程,涉及各种利益相关者的利益,同时他们也受到气候变化和社会转型不确定性的压力。为了应对这些挑战,出现了各种具有不同动机和方法的弹性举措。本研究的目的是了解动机与组织方法之间的相互作用以及弹性概念化。这可以让我们深入了解弹性的哪些领域受到了关注,以及他们在实现动机的组织方法中需要改进什么。本研究特别调查了荷兰的十个弹性基础设施项目。通过使用范围审查和内容分析,我们的结果强调了弹性计划以不同的方式概念化弹性,主要关注于长期和更广泛的地理范围内的构建和组织弹性。每个计划都有几个动机,包括1)创造创新的解决方案,2)共享知识,3)促进承诺和合作,以及4)促进弹性。这些动机反映在组织方法中。例如,在“创造共享知识”的动机和“研究合作”的组织方法之间有很强的联系。“促进弹性”等一般性动机并没有一个主流化的方法,这表明在实践中促进弹性仍处于探索阶段。本研究提供了主要动机和组织方法,以及它们在弹性基础设施倡议中的联系,有助于更好地组织旨在弹性基础设施的类似倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated knowledge graphs for complex systems (AutoGraCS): Applications to management of bridge networks Uncovering implicit Seismogenic associated regions towards promoting urban resilience Building Stock and Emission Models for Jakarta Key networks to create disaster resilient Smart Cities Mission: A case for remodeling India's Smart Cities Mission to include disaster resilience Landslide-oriented disaster resilience evaluation in mountainous cities: A case study in Chongqing, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1