« Docteur, pourrais-je avoir une copie du certificat ? » Étude pluricentrique concernant l’application des décrets du 31 mars 2021 et du 23 novembre 2021

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL Medecine & Droit Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.meddro.2022.07.001
Amélie-Anne Reuche (Praticien Hospitalier) , Elisabeth Martin (Praticien Hospitalier) , Cécile Zagdoun (Praticien Hospitalier) , Coralie Lelièvre (Praticien Hospitalier) , Bernard Bouverot (Praticien Hospitalier) , Cécile Manaouil (Praticien Hospitalier)
{"title":"« Docteur, pourrais-je avoir une copie du certificat ? » Étude pluricentrique concernant l’application des décrets du 31 mars 2021 et du 23 novembre 2021","authors":"Amélie-Anne Reuche (Praticien Hospitalier) ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Martin (Praticien Hospitalier) ,&nbsp;Cécile Zagdoun (Praticien Hospitalier) ,&nbsp;Coralie Lelièvre (Praticien Hospitalier) ,&nbsp;Bernard Bouverot (Praticien Hospitalier) ,&nbsp;Cécile Manaouil (Praticien Hospitalier)","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2022.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>On 31 March 2021, a decree was published in the Official Journal concerning the procedures for the delivery of medical certificates to victims of violence. These victims can now obtain a copy of the certificate drafted by the doctor required by the judicial authorities, particularly as regards medical examiners.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of our study was to assess the impact of the March 31, 2021 decree on victims’ requests to the medical examiner for a copy of the medical certificate.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective study was conducted among three forensic services receiving victims in consultation, using a paper questionnaire linked to Medlé data, over a three-month period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 1,492 consultations conducted during the study period, a copy of the certificate was only given to the victim in 13.1 % of the consultations. It was requested spontaneously by the victim in 15.2 % of cases, most often to exercise his right (46.4 %). These were primarily consultations following an accident, psychological abuse, and assault. This copy was requested spontaneously by less than 3 % of victims of domestic violence. There was some disparity between the three centres regarding the minor victim.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study is a small sample over a short period. The information of the victims, especially of domestic violence, on access to the copy of the medical-legal certificate seems still insufficient, and the principle of surrender, when it can help the victim in his efforts, can also be a source of confusion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2022 176","pages":"Pages 77-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739122000598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 31 March 2021, a decree was published in the Official Journal concerning the procedures for the delivery of medical certificates to victims of violence. These victims can now obtain a copy of the certificate drafted by the doctor required by the judicial authorities, particularly as regards medical examiners.

Purpose

The aim of our study was to assess the impact of the March 31, 2021 decree on victims’ requests to the medical examiner for a copy of the medical certificate.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted among three forensic services receiving victims in consultation, using a paper questionnaire linked to Medlé data, over a three-month period.

Results

Of the 1,492 consultations conducted during the study period, a copy of the certificate was only given to the victim in 13.1 % of the consultations. It was requested spontaneously by the victim in 15.2 % of cases, most often to exercise his right (46.4 %). These were primarily consultations following an accident, psychological abuse, and assault. This copy was requested spontaneously by less than 3 % of victims of domestic violence. There was some disparity between the three centres regarding the minor victim.

Conclusion

This study is a small sample over a short period. The information of the victims, especially of domestic violence, on access to the copy of the medical-legal certificate seems still insufficient, and the principle of surrender, when it can help the victim in his efforts, can also be a source of confusion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“医生,我可以要一份证书吗?”»关于2021年3月31日和2021年11月23日法令执行情况的多中心研究
2021年3月31日,在《官方公报》上公布了一项关于向暴力受害者提供医疗证明程序的法令。这些受害者现在可以获得司法当局要求的医生开具的证明副本,特别是关于医疗检查人员的证明副本。我们研究的目的是评估2021年3月31日法令对受害者要求法医提供医疗证明副本的影响。方法本前瞻性研究在三个月的时间里,在三家接受受害者咨询的法医服务机构中进行,使用与medl数据相关的纸质问卷。结果在研究期间进行的1492次咨询中,只有13.1%的咨询向受害者提供了证书副本。15.2%的案件是受害者自发提出的请求,最常是为了行使其权利(46.4%)。这些主要是在事故、心理虐待和攻击后进行的咨询。这份复印件是由不到3%的家庭暴力受害者自发提出的。三个中心对未成年受害者的看法有些不一致。结论本研究样本量小,时间短。受害者,特别是家庭暴力受害者关于获得医疗-法律证明副本的信息似乎仍然不足,投降原则虽然可以帮助受害者的努力,但也可能成为混乱的根源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medecine & Droit
Medecine & Droit MEDICINE, LEGAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues
期刊最新文献
Contents Contents Parcours de soins rénové, e-santé et maillage officinal : une réponse complexe à la pénurie de médecins Le concept de race : serpent de mer de la pratique médicale La loi du 10 mai 2024 contre les dérives sectaires : application dans le domaine de la santé : séparer le bon grain scientifique de l’ivraie charlatanesque
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1