Exploring the link between thought-action fusion and symptom-based shame in obsessive-compulsive disorder

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100848
Jana Hansmeier , Cornelia Exner , R. Porrmann , K. Schumacher , Jakob Fink-Lamotte
{"title":"Exploring the link between thought-action fusion and symptom-based shame in obsessive-compulsive disorder","authors":"Jana Hansmeier ,&nbsp;Cornelia Exner ,&nbsp;R. Porrmann ,&nbsp;K. Schumacher ,&nbsp;Jakob Fink-Lamotte","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The emotion of shame has been found to be closely related to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Thought-action fusion (TAF) might explain this relationship, but its causal role with regard to symptom-based shame is unclear. There is growing evidence showing that the metacognitive intervention of detached mindfulness (DM) helps to prevent the development of TAF and thereby shame. The current study investigates, (1) if a TAF induction condition with violent content increases shame compared to a control induction condition with neutral content in randomized nonclinical participants with heightened OCD symptoms (<em>n</em> = 88), and (2) if a subsequent brief DM intervention shows a preventive effect for developing shame compared to a control condition about mnemonic techniques. An ANOVA showed that shame in participants of the TAF induction significantly increased compared to the control condition. In a second ANOVA, the DM intervention failed to show a preventive effect on developing TAF and shame in a following TAF induction experiment compared to the control condition. The present findings suggest the importance of TAF beliefs for the development of shame. A more intense DM intervention or additional (meta-)cognitive interventions might be necessary to prevent the development of shame.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364923000696","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emotion of shame has been found to be closely related to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Thought-action fusion (TAF) might explain this relationship, but its causal role with regard to symptom-based shame is unclear. There is growing evidence showing that the metacognitive intervention of detached mindfulness (DM) helps to prevent the development of TAF and thereby shame. The current study investigates, (1) if a TAF induction condition with violent content increases shame compared to a control induction condition with neutral content in randomized nonclinical participants with heightened OCD symptoms (n = 88), and (2) if a subsequent brief DM intervention shows a preventive effect for developing shame compared to a control condition about mnemonic techniques. An ANOVA showed that shame in participants of the TAF induction significantly increased compared to the control condition. In a second ANOVA, the DM intervention failed to show a preventive effect on developing TAF and shame in a following TAF induction experiment compared to the control condition. The present findings suggest the importance of TAF beliefs for the development of shame. A more intense DM intervention or additional (meta-)cognitive interventions might be necessary to prevent the development of shame.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨强迫症中思想-行动融合与基于症状的羞耻感之间的联系
羞耻情绪被发现与强迫症(OCD)密切相关。思想-行动融合(Thought-action fusion, TAF)或许可以解释这种关系,但它在基于症状的羞耻感方面的因果作用尚不清楚。越来越多的证据表明,超然正念(DM)的元认知干预有助于防止TAF的发展,从而防止羞耻。目前的研究调查了:(1)在随机的有强迫症症状的非临床参与者中,与中性内容的对照诱导条件相比,具有暴力内容的TAF诱导条件是否会增加羞耻感(n = 88);(2)与记忆技巧的对照条件相比,随后的短暂DM干预是否显示出对产生羞耻感的预防作用。方差分析显示,TAF诱导组的羞耻感明显高于对照组。在第二个方差分析中,与对照组相比,DM干预在随后的TAF诱导实验中未能显示出对TAF和羞耻感的预防作用。目前的研究结果表明,TAF信念对羞耻感的发展很重要。更强烈的糖尿病干预或额外的(元)认知干预可能是必要的,以防止羞耻的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1