The trade comovement puzzle and the margins of international trade

IF 4 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of International Economics Pub Date : 2015-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.02.004
Wei Liao , Ana Maria Santacreu
{"title":"The trade comovement puzzle and the margins of international trade","authors":"Wei Liao ,&nbsp;Ana Maria Santacreu","doi":"10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Countries that trade more with each other tend to have more strongly correlated business cycles. Yet, traditional international business cycle models predict a much weaker link between trade and business cycle comovement. We propose that fluctuations in the number of varieties embedded in trade flows may drive the observed comovement by increasing the correlation among trading partners' aggregate productivity. Our hypothesis is that business cycles should be more strongly correlated between countries that trade a wider variety of goods. We find empirical support for this hypothesis. After decomposing trade into its extensive and intensive margins, we find that the extensive margin explains most of the trade–productivity and trade–output comovement. This result is striking because the extensive margin accounts for only a fourth of the variability in total trade. We then develop a two-country model with heterogeneous firms, endogenous entry, and fixed export costs, in which the aggregate productivity correlation increases with trade in varieties. A numerical exercise shows that our proposed mechanism increases business cycle synchronization compared with the levels predicted by traditional models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16276,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Economics","volume":"96 2","pages":"Pages 266-288"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.02.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199615000549","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Countries that trade more with each other tend to have more strongly correlated business cycles. Yet, traditional international business cycle models predict a much weaker link between trade and business cycle comovement. We propose that fluctuations in the number of varieties embedded in trade flows may drive the observed comovement by increasing the correlation among trading partners' aggregate productivity. Our hypothesis is that business cycles should be more strongly correlated between countries that trade a wider variety of goods. We find empirical support for this hypothesis. After decomposing trade into its extensive and intensive margins, we find that the extensive margin explains most of the trade–productivity and trade–output comovement. This result is striking because the extensive margin accounts for only a fourth of the variability in total trade. We then develop a two-country model with heterogeneous firms, endogenous entry, and fixed export costs, in which the aggregate productivity correlation increases with trade in varieties. A numerical exercise shows that our proposed mechanism increases business cycle synchronization compared with the levels predicted by traditional models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贸易运动之谜与国际贸易的边际
相互间贸易量越大的国家,其商业周期的相关性越强。然而,传统的国际商业周期模型预测,贸易与商业周期变动之间的联系要弱得多。我们提出,贸易流动中嵌入的品种数量的波动可能通过增加贸易伙伴总生产率之间的相关性来驱动观察到的共同运动。我们的假设是,在贸易种类更广的国家之间,商业周期的相关性应该更强。我们为这一假设找到了实证支持。在将贸易分解为粗放边际和集约边际后,我们发现粗放边际解释了贸易生产率和贸易产出的大部分变动。这个结果是惊人的,因为广泛的保证金只占总贸易变化的四分之一。然后,我们开发了一个具有异质性企业、内生进入和固定出口成本的两国模型,其中总生产率相关性随着品种贸易而增加。数值计算表明,与传统模型预测的水平相比,我们提出的机制增加了商业周期同步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Economics is intended to serve as the primary outlet for theoretical and empirical research in all areas of international economics. These include, but are not limited to the following: trade patterns, commercial policy; international institutions; exchange rates; open economy macroeconomics; international finance; international factor mobility. The Journal especially encourages the submission of articles which are empirical in nature, or deal with issues of open economy macroeconomics and international finance. Theoretical work submitted to the Journal should be original in its motivation or modelling structure. Empirical analysis should be based on a theoretical framework, and should be capable of replication.
期刊最新文献
Historical military conflict, current trade tensions, and global supply chains Labor market polarization and the great urban divergence Protection for sale without aggregation bias Knowledge diffusion through FDI: Worldwide firm-level evidence Services trade and the choice of online versus in-person delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1