National organic action plans and organic farmland area growth in Europe

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102531
Charles Rees , Christian Grovermann , Robert Finger
{"title":"National organic action plans and organic farmland area growth in Europe","authors":"Charles Rees ,&nbsp;Christian Grovermann ,&nbsp;Robert Finger","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The expansion of organic agricultural production methods has been tendered as a critical factor in the development of a sustainable global food system. The European Union has led efforts to expand organic farming, with a current target share of 25% organic farmland area by 2030 through the Farm-to-Fork strategy. Many member states have set organic area targets through the initiation of organic action plans, but systematic, quantitative, empirical research into the effectiveness of such organic policies is lacking. This study analyses the effect of four different national organic action plans - the 1<sup>st</sup> French Organic Action Plan (2008 to 2012), the 2<sup>nd</sup> Swedish Organic Action Plan (2006 to 2010), the 2<sup>nd</sup> Czech Organic Action Plan (2011 to 2015) and the 5<sup>th</sup> Austria Organic Action Plan (2011 to 2013) - on organic farmland area extent. This was achieved using a balanced country-level panel dataset consisting of 26 OECD states between 2001 and 2019 (N = 494). The synthetic control method was applied systematically to predict the counterfactual organic area growth paths, enabling the quantification of the treatment effects for the selected action plans. The model specifications were vigorously tested with leave-out-one robustness tests and in-space placebo tests. The results indicated robust, large, positive and significant effects for the French and Swedish organic action plans on organic farmland area. However, the Czech and Austrian plans were found to be ineffectual. Whilst organic action plans appear useful agenda-setting tools, caution is advised in relying on them to produce consistent results, particularly if numerous plans have been previously implemented and the organic area share is already high. This finding is also likely indicative of decreasing marginal returns to action plans. A deeper understanding of the effectiveness of previously implemented plans is critical for the optimisation of future interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030691922300129X/pdfft?md5=411bfd72f0479471747abebc5ca6388f&pid=1-s2.0-S030691922300129X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030691922300129X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The expansion of organic agricultural production methods has been tendered as a critical factor in the development of a sustainable global food system. The European Union has led efforts to expand organic farming, with a current target share of 25% organic farmland area by 2030 through the Farm-to-Fork strategy. Many member states have set organic area targets through the initiation of organic action plans, but systematic, quantitative, empirical research into the effectiveness of such organic policies is lacking. This study analyses the effect of four different national organic action plans - the 1st French Organic Action Plan (2008 to 2012), the 2nd Swedish Organic Action Plan (2006 to 2010), the 2nd Czech Organic Action Plan (2011 to 2015) and the 5th Austria Organic Action Plan (2011 to 2013) - on organic farmland area extent. This was achieved using a balanced country-level panel dataset consisting of 26 OECD states between 2001 and 2019 (N = 494). The synthetic control method was applied systematically to predict the counterfactual organic area growth paths, enabling the quantification of the treatment effects for the selected action plans. The model specifications were vigorously tested with leave-out-one robustness tests and in-space placebo tests. The results indicated robust, large, positive and significant effects for the French and Swedish organic action plans on organic farmland area. However, the Czech and Austrian plans were found to be ineffectual. Whilst organic action plans appear useful agenda-setting tools, caution is advised in relying on them to produce consistent results, particularly if numerous plans have been previously implemented and the organic area share is already high. This finding is also likely indicative of decreasing marginal returns to action plans. A deeper understanding of the effectiveness of previously implemented plans is critical for the optimisation of future interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲国家有机行动计划和有机农田面积增长
有机农业生产方法的扩展已被视为可持续全球粮食系统发展的关键因素。欧盟一直在努力扩大有机农业,目前的目标是通过“从农场到餐桌”战略,到2030年有机农田面积达到25%。许多成员国通过启动有机行动计划制定了有机区域目标,但缺乏对此类有机政策有效性的系统、定量和实证研究。本研究分析了法国第一次有机行动计划(2008 - 2012年)、瑞典第二次有机行动计划(2006 - 2010年)、捷克第二次有机行动计划(2011 - 2015年)和奥地利第五次有机行动计划(2011 - 2013年)四个不同国家有机行动计划对有机农田面积的影响。这是通过一个平衡的国家级面板数据集实现的,该数据集由2001年至2019年的26个经合组织国家组成(N = 494)。系统地应用综合控制方法预测反事实有机面积增长路径,使所选行动计划的处理效果得以量化。对模型规格进行了强有力的检验,其中包括留一鲁棒性检验和空间安慰剂检验。结果表明,法国和瑞典的有机行动计划对有机农田面积产生了强劲、巨大、积极和显著的影响。然而,捷克和奥地利的计划被发现是无效的。虽然有机行动计划似乎是有用的议程设置工具,但建议在依赖它们产生一致结果时要谨慎,特别是在以前实施了许多计划并且有机领域份额已经很高的情况下。这一发现也可能表明行动计划的边际收益正在减少。更深入地了解以前实施的计划的有效性对于优化未来的干预措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
期刊最新文献
Reflections on food policy in the context of healthy and sustainable diets The impact of pre-empting dual food quality regulation on product reformulation and packaging Autopsy of a futures market failure: Japan’s Dojima rice futures in the early 21st century Women improving nutrition through self-help groups in India: Does nutrition information help? Integrating system dynamics to value chain analysis to address price volatility in the Indonesian chilli value chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1