Nation, alterity and competing discourses: Rethinking textbooks as ideological apparatuses

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Linguistics and Education Pub Date : 2023-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.linged.2023.101250
Waqar Ali Shah
{"title":"Nation, alterity and competing discourses: Rethinking textbooks as ideological apparatuses","authors":"Waqar Ali Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2023.101250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Schools worldwide rely heavily on textbooks to disseminate knowledge and guide pedagogical choices. In critical discourse studies, textbooks have been shown to function as national policy instruments, carry a hidden curriculum, and enact a global agenda. The existing literature, however, pays a little attention to the fact that textbooks also represent competing discourses rather than merely being ideological apparatuses. The purpose of this study is to fill this gap by examining national subjecthood, alterity, and the way textbooks engender competing discourses and make them accessible to learners. Based on critical and post-structuralist discourse traditions, 12 English language textbooks were analyzed in one province of Pakistan. National subjecthood appears to have been constituted through various discursive indexes, including religion, gendered subjectivity, languages, literature, and patriotic sentiments among others. The Other is constituted in textbooks both as internals (religious minorities) and externals (e.g., India). Additionally, textbooks offer learners competing discourses with a possibility to negotiate their subject positions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589823001092/pdfft?md5=d4262cfc464ec07c7e3b3151229f45ba&pid=1-s2.0-S0898589823001092-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589823001092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schools worldwide rely heavily on textbooks to disseminate knowledge and guide pedagogical choices. In critical discourse studies, textbooks have been shown to function as national policy instruments, carry a hidden curriculum, and enact a global agenda. The existing literature, however, pays a little attention to the fact that textbooks also represent competing discourses rather than merely being ideological apparatuses. The purpose of this study is to fill this gap by examining national subjecthood, alterity, and the way textbooks engender competing discourses and make them accessible to learners. Based on critical and post-structuralist discourse traditions, 12 English language textbooks were analyzed in one province of Pakistan. National subjecthood appears to have been constituted through various discursive indexes, including religion, gendered subjectivity, languages, literature, and patriotic sentiments among others. The Other is constituted in textbooks both as internals (religious minorities) and externals (e.g., India). Additionally, textbooks offer learners competing discourses with a possibility to negotiate their subject positions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民族、另类与竞争话语:教科书作为意识形态工具的再思考
世界各地的学校都严重依赖教科书来传播知识和指导教学选择。在批判性话语研究中,教科书已被证明是国家政策工具,承载着隐藏的课程,并制定了全球议程。然而,现有的文献很少注意到,教科书不仅是意识形态的机器,而且还代表着竞争话语。本研究的目的是通过考察国家主体性、互动性以及教科书产生竞争性话语的方式,并使学习者能够理解这些话语,来填补这一空白。基于批判和后结构主义话语传统,对巴基斯坦一个省的12本英语教科书进行了分析。国家主体性似乎是通过各种话语指标构成的,包括宗教、性别主体性、语言、文学和爱国情绪等。他者在教科书中既是内部的(宗教少数群体)也是外部的(例如印度)。此外,教科书为学习者提供了相互竞争的话语,使他们有可能协商自己的主题立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Linguistics and Education encourages submissions that apply theory and method from all areas of linguistics to the study of education. Areas of linguistic study include, but are not limited to: text/corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, functional grammar, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, conversational analysis, linguistic anthropology/ethnography, language acquisition, language socialization, narrative studies, gesture/ sign /visual forms of communication, cognitive linguistics, literacy studies, language policy, and language ideology.
期刊最新文献
Grammatical and rhetorical reasoning in upper secondary students’ collaborative talk about a literary text Understanding EFL students’ academically transitioning experiences with meaning-making-based instruction: A qualitative inquiry On the necessity (and insufficiency) of ethnographic perspectives: Towards an inter-scalar approach to research on “academic language” Let a hundred flowers bloom: Towards a coexistence of paradigms in language assessment literacy Pre-service teachers’ hinting practices in managing responses in a microteaching context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1