Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of oral science Pub Date : 2023-03-30 DOI:10.2334/josnusd.22-0396
Jovana Milutinovic, Ema Aleksic, Stevan Avramov, Katarina Kalevski, Milica Gajic, Djordje Pejanovic, Jasmina Milic
{"title":"Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.","authors":"Jovana Milutinovic,&nbsp;Ema Aleksic,&nbsp;Stevan Avramov,&nbsp;Katarina Kalevski,&nbsp;Milica Gajic,&nbsp;Djordje Pejanovic,&nbsp;Jasmina Milic","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.22-0396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this investigation was to determine whether the facial esthetics of subjects rated as \"attractive\" can be related to specific cephalometric soft tissue parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The profile silhouettes of 100 subjects (45 males and 55 females) were rated by 60 esthetics specialists (20 orthodontists, 20 dentists, and 20 plastic surgeons) using a Likert scale, and 30 of the subjects were selected as being \"attractive\". The cephalometric measurements of the attractive group were then compared with norms for the general Caucasian population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effects of specific measured parameters on profile beauty grades were assessed using the median test, and the following variables were found to show significant correlations between the Caucasian norms and the attractive profile group: the ratio of the upper to lower face height (P = 0.011), the ratio of the subnasale - labrale inferius (Sn-Li) and labrale inferius - menton (Li-Me`) lines (P = 0.011), the distance between the chin and the subnasale perpendicular (P = 0.002), upper lip thickness (P = 0.021), soft tissue chin thickness (P = 0.021), vertical height ratio (P = 0.021), and nasolabial angle (P = 0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A straight profile with a fuller and more protruded upper lip, a higher nasal tip, and a smaller lower facial third are considered to be the most attractive facial features, and may be useful for improvement of facial esthetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.22-0396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this investigation was to determine whether the facial esthetics of subjects rated as "attractive" can be related to specific cephalometric soft tissue parameters.

Methods: The profile silhouettes of 100 subjects (45 males and 55 females) were rated by 60 esthetics specialists (20 orthodontists, 20 dentists, and 20 plastic surgeons) using a Likert scale, and 30 of the subjects were selected as being "attractive". The cephalometric measurements of the attractive group were then compared with norms for the general Caucasian population.

Results: The effects of specific measured parameters on profile beauty grades were assessed using the median test, and the following variables were found to show significant correlations between the Caucasian norms and the attractive profile group: the ratio of the upper to lower face height (P = 0.011), the ratio of the subnasale - labrale inferius (Sn-Li) and labrale inferius - menton (Li-Me`) lines (P = 0.011), the distance between the chin and the subnasale perpendicular (P = 0.002), upper lip thickness (P = 0.021), soft tissue chin thickness (P = 0.021), vertical height ratio (P = 0.021), and nasolabial angle (P = 0.021).

Conclusion: A straight profile with a fuller and more protruded upper lip, a higher nasal tip, and a smaller lower facial third are considered to be the most attractive facial features, and may be useful for improvement of facial esthetics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正畸医生、牙医和整形外科医生对平衡面部轮廓的审美偏好。
目的:本研究的目的是确定被评为“有吸引力”的受试者的面部美学是否与特定的头部软组织参数有关。方法:由60名美容专家(20名正畸医师、20名牙医和20名整形外科医生)对100名受试者(男性45名,女性55名)的轮廓轮廓进行李克特评分,选出30名“有吸引力”的受试者。然后将有吸引力的一组的头侧测量值与普通高加索人群的标准进行比较。结果:使用中位数检验评估了特定测量参数对轮廓美等级的影响,并发现以下变量在高加索规范和有吸引力的轮廓组之间显示显着相关性:面部上下高度之比(P = 0.011)、鼻下-下唇肌线(Sn-Li)与下唇肌线(Li-Me’)之比(P = 0.011)、下巴与鼻下垂线之间的距离(P = 0.002)、上唇厚度(P = 0.021)、下颌软组织厚度(P = 0.021)、垂直高度比(P = 0.021)、鼻唇角(P = 0.021)。结论:上唇较饱满、较突出、鼻尖较高、下面部三分之一较小的直型轮廓被认为是最具吸引力的面部特征,可能有助于改善面部美学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral science
Journal of oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of maxillary first molar accessory root canal morphology in a Black South African subpopulation. Attitudes of general and specialist French practitioners toward stage III-IV grade C periodontitis with familial aggregation. Clinical behavior and survival of endodontically treated teeth with or without post placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CAD-CAM for removable partial denture fabrication after marginal mandibulectomy based on a well-adjusted pre-existing denture. Assessment of cytotoxicity, odontoblast-like differentiation, shear bond strength, and microhardness of four orthodontic adhesive composites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1