Effect of intra-radicular cleaning protocols after post-space preparation on marginal adaptation of a luting agent to root dentin.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of oral science Pub Date : 2023-03-30 DOI:10.2334/josnusd.22-0344
Luciana C Boggian, Ana V Silva, Geovana R Santos, Geovanna F Oliveira, Winston L Silva, Ismar Nery Neto, Orlando A Guedes, Carlos Estrela
{"title":"Effect of intra-radicular cleaning protocols after post-space preparation on marginal adaptation of a luting agent to root dentin.","authors":"Luciana C Boggian,&nbsp;Ana V Silva,&nbsp;Geovana R Santos,&nbsp;Geovanna F Oliveira,&nbsp;Winston L Silva,&nbsp;Ismar Nery Neto,&nbsp;Orlando A Guedes,&nbsp;Carlos Estrela","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.22-0344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of intra-radicular cleaning protocols after post-space preparation (PSP) on marginal adaptation of a luting agent to root dentin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty bovine incisors were sectioned transversely to obtain 18-mm-long root sections. The roots were prepared with ProTaper instruments and filled using Tagger's hybrid technique. PSP was performed at a length of 14 mm using #3-5 Largo drills. The roots were distributed into eight groups according to the chelating solution used (17% EDTA or 0.2% Chitosan) and the chelating activation/delivery method employed (conventional needle irrigation [CNI], EndoActivator [EA], XP-Endo Finisher [XPF] or passive ultrasonic irrigation [PUI]). The fiber posts were cemented using self-adhesive resin cement, and the roots were sectioned to obtain three discs from each root third. The dentin discs were observed under an optical microscope at ×40 magnification to assess marginal adaptation. The different protocols were compared considering the frequency of the marginal adaptation scores using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner test (α = 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of 17% EDTA resulted in better marginal adaptation (P < 0.001). PUI yielded results that were similar to those for EA (P = 0.949) and superior to those for XPF (P = 0.020). The combination of 17% EDTA + PUI provided a greater number of interfaces without marginal gaps (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cleaning protocol influenced the marginal adaptation of resin cement to root dentin.</p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":"65 2","pages":"81-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.22-0344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of intra-radicular cleaning protocols after post-space preparation (PSP) on marginal adaptation of a luting agent to root dentin.

Methods: Eighty bovine incisors were sectioned transversely to obtain 18-mm-long root sections. The roots were prepared with ProTaper instruments and filled using Tagger's hybrid technique. PSP was performed at a length of 14 mm using #3-5 Largo drills. The roots were distributed into eight groups according to the chelating solution used (17% EDTA or 0.2% Chitosan) and the chelating activation/delivery method employed (conventional needle irrigation [CNI], EndoActivator [EA], XP-Endo Finisher [XPF] or passive ultrasonic irrigation [PUI]). The fiber posts were cemented using self-adhesive resin cement, and the roots were sectioned to obtain three discs from each root third. The dentin discs were observed under an optical microscope at ×40 magnification to assess marginal adaptation. The different protocols were compared considering the frequency of the marginal adaptation scores using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner test (α = 5%).

Results: The use of 17% EDTA resulted in better marginal adaptation (P < 0.001). PUI yielded results that were similar to those for EA (P = 0.949) and superior to those for XPF (P = 0.020). The combination of 17% EDTA + PUI provided a greater number of interfaces without marginal gaps (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The cleaning protocol influenced the marginal adaptation of resin cement to root dentin.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间隙预备后根内清洁方案对清洁剂对根本质边缘适应的影响。
目的:评价牙根间隙预备(PSP)后根内清洁方案对牙根牙本质边缘适应的影响。方法:对80只牛切牙进行横切,获得长18mm的根切面。根用ProTaper器械制备,并用Tagger杂交技术填充。使用#3-5 Largo钻头进行长度为14 mm的PSP。根据使用的螯合溶液(17% EDTA或0.2%壳糖)和螯合激活/递送方法(传统针刺冲洗[CNI]、EndoActivator [EA]、XPF - endo Finisher [XPF]或被动超声冲洗[PUI])将根分为8组。纤维桩采用自粘树脂胶粘剂进行胶结,并对根进行切片,每根三分之一处取三盘。在×40放大光学显微镜下观察牙本质盘,评估边缘适应。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner检验(α = 5%)比较不同方案的边际适应评分频率。结果:使用17% EDTA可获得更好的边际适应(P < 0.001)。PUI的结果与EA相似(P = 0.949),优于XPF (P = 0.020)。17% EDTA + PUI的组合提供了更多的界面,没有边际间隙(P < 0.001)。结论:清洁方式影响树脂粘接体对牙根本质的边缘适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral science
Journal of oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
In vitro cytotoxicity of dental implant cements on human gingival and mouse preosteoblast cell lines. Effect of graphene oxide on the biaxial flexural strength and translucency of ultrathin monolithic zirconia. Effect of coffee roasting level on tooth discoloration. Effects of different types of molds on the color difference, translucency, surface roughness, and hardness of a maxillofacial silicone elastomer. Effects of initial periodontal therapy on leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein levels in saliva from Japanese patients with chronic periodontitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1