What is the implicit self in infancy? A classification and evaluation of current theories on the early self

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Cognitive Development Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cogdev.2023.101394
Nina-Alisa Kollakowski , Maria Mammen , Markus Paulus
{"title":"What is the implicit self in infancy? A classification and evaluation of current theories on the early self","authors":"Nina-Alisa Kollakowski ,&nbsp;Maria Mammen ,&nbsp;Markus Paulus","doi":"10.1016/j.cogdev.2023.101394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Developmental science is increasingly interested in investigating the early ontogeny of the so-called implicit self. It is supposed to be a non-conceptual form of self including the experiences of agency and bodily ownership. Several theories have been proposed to account for the development of an implicit self and have inspired lines of empirical investigations. However, comparing these theories is difficult because the extent to which they rely on similar concepts is unclear, which in turn prevents systematic evaluation. This paper aims to provide an overview of currently influential theories on the development of the implicit self. It advances the debate by classifying the theories as either positing a unified implicit self, multiple implicit selves, or no self at all. The core assumptions of each theory are derived based on a comprehensive set of criteria, and evaluated using current empirical research. This overview proposes research directions that would enable further theoretical understanding of the ontogeny of the implicit self.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51422,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201423000990","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developmental science is increasingly interested in investigating the early ontogeny of the so-called implicit self. It is supposed to be a non-conceptual form of self including the experiences of agency and bodily ownership. Several theories have been proposed to account for the development of an implicit self and have inspired lines of empirical investigations. However, comparing these theories is difficult because the extent to which they rely on similar concepts is unclear, which in turn prevents systematic evaluation. This paper aims to provide an overview of currently influential theories on the development of the implicit self. It advances the debate by classifying the theories as either positing a unified implicit self, multiple implicit selves, or no self at all. The core assumptions of each theory are derived based on a comprehensive set of criteria, and evaluated using current empirical research. This overview proposes research directions that would enable further theoretical understanding of the ontogeny of the implicit self.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿时期的内隐自我是什么?早期自我理论的分类与评价
发展科学对研究所谓内隐自我的早期个体发生越来越感兴趣。它应该是自我的一种非概念性形式包括能动性和身体所有权的经验。已经提出了几个理论来解释内隐自我的发展,并启发了实证研究的思路。然而,比较这些理论是困难的,因为它们在多大程度上依赖于相似的概念是不清楚的,这反过来又阻碍了系统的评估。本文旨在对目前有关内隐自我发展的重要理论进行综述。它通过将理论分为假设一个统一的内隐自我,多个内隐自我,或者根本没有自我来推进辩论。每个理论的核心假设都是基于一套全面的标准推导出来的,并使用当前的实证研究进行评估。本综述提出的研究方向将有助于对内隐自我个体发生的进一步理论认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Cognitive Development contains the very best empirical and theoretical work on the development of perception, memory, language, concepts, thinking, problem solving, metacognition, and social cognition. Criteria for acceptance of articles will be: significance of the work to issues of current interest, substance of the argument, and clarity of expression. For purposes of publication in Cognitive Development, moral and social development will be considered part of cognitive development when they are related to the development of knowledge or thought processes.
期刊最新文献
Development of L1-L2 naming skills in a monolingual context: Evidence from children and adolescents Children’s perceptions of intergroup similarity and dissimilarity and their association with attitudes towards a conflict out-group The “How many?” task inadequately assesses the understanding of the cardinality principle The shape bias in Mandarin-exposed young autistic children: The role of abstract shape representation Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1