Safe reuse of treated produced water outside oil and gas fields? A review of current practices, challenges, opportunities, and a risk-based pathway for produced water treatment and fit-for-purpose reuse
Himali M.K. Delanka-Pedige , Yanyan Zhang , Robert B. Young , Huiyao Wang , Lei Hu , Cloelle Danforth , Pei Xu
{"title":"Safe reuse of treated produced water outside oil and gas fields? A review of current practices, challenges, opportunities, and a risk-based pathway for produced water treatment and fit-for-purpose reuse","authors":"Himali M.K. Delanka-Pedige , Yanyan Zhang , Robert B. Young , Huiyao Wang , Lei Hu , Cloelle Danforth , Pei Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.coche.2023.100973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The oil and gas (O&G) industry has expanded significantly and brought to the surface large volumes of saline water called produced water (PW), which comprises of underground formation water, injection water, and chemical additives used during extraction and production. PW is traditionally managed via injection wells, evaporation/seepage pits, or recycling for on-site operations. There is increasing interest in PW treatment and reuse outside O&G fields due to freshwater scarcity and concerns about seismic events linked to deep-well injection. Adopting treated PW for reuse outside the O&G sector needs to address the challenges of complex water chemistry, limited toxicity data, and knowledge gaps for appropriate regulatory responses, including risk assessment frameworks on human health and the environment, socio-technical–economic assessments of treatment and reuse applications, and long-term demonstrations and monitoring of fit-for-purpose reuse. This opinion paper proposes a holistic, state-of-the-science pathway for PW treatment, management, and fit-for-purpose reuse outside O&G fields.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":292,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100973"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211339823000771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The oil and gas (O&G) industry has expanded significantly and brought to the surface large volumes of saline water called produced water (PW), which comprises of underground formation water, injection water, and chemical additives used during extraction and production. PW is traditionally managed via injection wells, evaporation/seepage pits, or recycling for on-site operations. There is increasing interest in PW treatment and reuse outside O&G fields due to freshwater scarcity and concerns about seismic events linked to deep-well injection. Adopting treated PW for reuse outside the O&G sector needs to address the challenges of complex water chemistry, limited toxicity data, and knowledge gaps for appropriate regulatory responses, including risk assessment frameworks on human health and the environment, socio-technical–economic assessments of treatment and reuse applications, and long-term demonstrations and monitoring of fit-for-purpose reuse. This opinion paper proposes a holistic, state-of-the-science pathway for PW treatment, management, and fit-for-purpose reuse outside O&G fields.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering is devoted to bringing forth short and focused review articles written by experts on current advances in different areas of chemical engineering. Only invited review articles will be published.
The goals of each review article in Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering are:
1. To acquaint the reader/researcher with the most important recent papers in the given topic.
2. To provide the reader with the views/opinions of the expert in each topic.
The reviews are short (about 2500 words or 5-10 printed pages with figures) and serve as an invaluable source of information for researchers, teachers, professionals and students. The reviews also aim to stimulate exchange of ideas among experts.
Themed sections:
Each review will focus on particular aspects of one of the following themed sections of chemical engineering:
1. Nanotechnology
2. Energy and environmental engineering
3. Biotechnology and bioprocess engineering
4. Biological engineering (covering tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, drug delivery)
5. Separation engineering (covering membrane technologies, adsorbents, desalination, distillation etc.)
6. Materials engineering (covering biomaterials, inorganic especially ceramic materials, nanostructured materials).
7. Process systems engineering
8. Reaction engineering and catalysis.