Board game-based intervention to improve executive functions and academic skills in rural schools: A randomized controlled trial

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2023.100216
Nuria Vita-Barrull , Verónica Estrada-Plana , Jaume March-Llanes , Núria Guzmán , Carlos Fernández-Muñoz , Rosa Ayesa , Jorge Moya-Higueras
{"title":"Board game-based intervention to improve executive functions and academic skills in rural schools: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Nuria Vita-Barrull ,&nbsp;Verónica Estrada-Plana ,&nbsp;Jaume March-Llanes ,&nbsp;Núria Guzmán ,&nbsp;Carlos Fernández-Muñoz ,&nbsp;Rosa Ayesa ,&nbsp;Jorge Moya-Higueras","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2023.100216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This research intends to increase the knowledge about the use of board games in the classroom to train executive functions and academic skills. 99 children from rural schools were assessed in executive functions and academic skills.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Through a randomized controlled trial, they were assigned to a playing group (<em>n</em> = 51) and an active control group (regular classes without games, <em>n</em> = 48). Play program consisted of 12 sessions for 6 weeks with eight commercial board games.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In flexibility, the playing group was significantly faster after the program (<em>p</em>= = .01, <em>d</em> = 0.76), but not the control group (<em>p</em> = .23; <em>d</em> = 0.35). Both groups improved in the academic tasks, but the significance in calculus was greater in the playing group (<em>p</em> = .00; <em>d</em> = 2.19) than in the control group (<em>p</em> = .01; <em>d</em> = 0.97).</p></div><div><h3>Discusion</h3><p>The use of board games during school hours could be as good or better methodology for cognitive training and learning academic skills than regular classes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100216"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949323000194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This research intends to increase the knowledge about the use of board games in the classroom to train executive functions and academic skills. 99 children from rural schools were assessed in executive functions and academic skills.

Methods

Through a randomized controlled trial, they were assigned to a playing group (n = 51) and an active control group (regular classes without games, n = 48). Play program consisted of 12 sessions for 6 weeks with eight commercial board games.

Results

In flexibility, the playing group was significantly faster after the program (p= = .01, d = 0.76), but not the control group (p = .23; d = 0.35). Both groups improved in the academic tasks, but the significance in calculus was greater in the playing group (p = .00; d = 2.19) than in the control group (p = .01; d = 0.97).

Discusion

The use of board games during school hours could be as good or better methodology for cognitive training and learning academic skills than regular classes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于棋盘游戏的干预提高农村学校执行功能和学习技能:一项随机对照试验
本研究旨在增加课堂上使用桌游的知识,以训练执行功能和学术技能。对99名农村学校儿童的执行能力和学习技能进行了评估。方法采用随机对照试验,随机分为游戏组(51例)和活动组(48例)。游戏计划包括6周的12个回合,其中包括8款商业棋盘游戏。结果在柔韧性方面,播放组在节目结束后显著提高(p= 0.01, d = 0.76),而对照组无显著提高(p= 0.23;d = 0.35)。两组在学业任务上都有所提高,但在微积分上,游戏组的显著性更大(p = .00;D = 2.19)显著高于对照组(p = 0.01;d = 0.97)。与常规课堂相比,在学校时间玩桌游对于认知训练和学习学术技能来说是一种很好的甚至更好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Dimensional versus categorical approach: A comparative study of mathematical cognition Translating neuroscience research to practice through grassroots professional learning communities Combining cognitive and affective factors related to mathematical achievement in 4th graders: A psychological network analysis study Neurobiological stress markers in educational research: A systematic review of physiological insights in health science education Applying the science of learning to teacher professional development and back again: Lessons from 3 country contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1