Is football coming out? Anti-gay attitudes, social desirability, and pluralistic ignorance in amateur and professional football

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Social Science Research Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102947
Georg Kanitsar , Katharina Pfaff
{"title":"Is football coming out? Anti-gay attitudes, social desirability, and pluralistic ignorance in amateur and professional football","authors":"Georg Kanitsar ,&nbsp;Katharina Pfaff","doi":"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Past work consistently points to improved attitudes towards gay athletes and growing support for homosexuality, yet reports of a homophobic climate in amateur and professional football persist. Here, we explore two potential explanations for the prevalence of homophobia in football despite low levels of anti-gay attitudes: social desirability and pluralistic ignorance. We conduct an online survey among a football-affine and socio-demographically diverse sample in the UK. We find that anti-gay attitudes are rare. Importantly, estimates from a list experiment do not differ from the prevalence measured by direct questions, providing no evidence of social desirability. By contrast, second-order beliefs about anti-gay attitudes substantially and consistently exceed attitudes, pointing towards pluralistic ignorance as the most likely explanation. We conclude by emphasizing the need for transparent communication to reduce pluralistic ignorance and correct misperceptions among players, officials and supporters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48338,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Research","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 102947"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X23001023/pdfft?md5=7062efb7f57a9bb7b94b7ceaf23d2b3c&pid=1-s2.0-S0049089X23001023-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X23001023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Past work consistently points to improved attitudes towards gay athletes and growing support for homosexuality, yet reports of a homophobic climate in amateur and professional football persist. Here, we explore two potential explanations for the prevalence of homophobia in football despite low levels of anti-gay attitudes: social desirability and pluralistic ignorance. We conduct an online survey among a football-affine and socio-demographically diverse sample in the UK. We find that anti-gay attitudes are rare. Importantly, estimates from a list experiment do not differ from the prevalence measured by direct questions, providing no evidence of social desirability. By contrast, second-order beliefs about anti-gay attitudes substantially and consistently exceed attitudes, pointing towards pluralistic ignorance as the most likely explanation. We conclude by emphasizing the need for transparent communication to reduce pluralistic ignorance and correct misperceptions among players, officials and supporters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
足球要出来了吗?反同性恋态度,社会渴望,以及业余和职业足球的多元无知
过去的研究一直指出,人们对同性恋运动员的态度有所改善,对同性恋的支持也越来越多,但有关业余和职业足球中恐同气氛的报道仍然存在。在这里,我们探讨了两种可能的解释,尽管反同性恋的态度很低,但足球中同性恋恐惧症的流行:社会可取性和多元无知。我们在英国进行了一项在线调查,调查对象是足球爱好者和社会人口统计学上不同的样本。我们发现反同性恋的态度很少见。重要的是,从列表实验中得出的估计与通过直接问题测量的流行程度没有区别,没有提供社会可取性的证据。相比之下,关于反同性恋态度的二阶信念实质上和一贯地超过态度,指出多元无知是最可能的解释。最后,我们强调需要透明的沟通,以减少多元化的无知,纠正球员、官员和支持者之间的误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Social Science Research publishes papers devoted to quantitative social science research and methodology. The journal features articles that illustrate the use of quantitative methods in the empirical solution of substantive problems, and emphasizes those concerned with issues or methods that cut across traditional disciplinary lines. Special attention is given to methods that have been used by only one particular social science discipline, but that may have application to a broader range of areas.
期刊最新文献
Impact of layoffs on mortality and physical health in transitional China 1989–2015 Political and educational dynamics behind the Evangelicals’ stance against mask mandates during COVID-19 in the U.S. Social welfare expansion and political support during economic slowdown: A panel data analysis of China, 2010–2018 Punishing “gender deviants”? Women born in the year of the white horse and college selectivity The effects of world society on international poverty, 1990–2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1