Vectorized instructive signals in cortical dendrites during a brain-computer interface task.

Valerio Francioni, Vincent D Tang, Enrique H S Toloza, Norma J Brown, Mark T Harnett
{"title":"Vectorized instructive signals in cortical dendrites during a brain-computer interface task.","authors":"Valerio Francioni, Vincent D Tang, Enrique H S Toloza, Norma J Brown, Mark T Harnett","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.03.565534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vectorization of teaching signals is a key element of virtually all modern machine learning algorithms, including backpropagation, target propagation and reinforcement learning. Vectorization allows a scalable and computationally efficient solution to the credit assignment problem by tailoring instructive signals to individual neurons. Recent theoretical models have suggested that neural circuits could implement single-phase vectorized learning at the cellular level by processing feedforward and feedback information streams in separate dendritic compartments<sup>1-5</sup>. This presents a compelling, but untested, hypothesis for how cortical circuits could solve credit assignment in the brain. We leveraged a neurofeedback brain-computer interface (BCI) task with an experimenter-defined reward function to test for vectorized instructive signals in dendrites. We trained mice to modulate the activity of two spatially intermingled populations (4 or 5 neurons each) of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the retrosplenial cortex to rotate a visual grating towards a target orientation while we recorded GCaMP activity from somas and corresponding distal apical dendrites. We observed that the relative magnitudes of somatic versus dendritic signals could be predicted using the activity of the surrounding network and contained information about task-related variables that could serve as instructive signals, including reward and error. The signs of these putative teaching signals both depended on the causal role of individual neurons in the task and predicted changes in overall activity over the course of learning. Furthermore, targeted optogenetic perturbation of these signals disrupted learning. These results provide the first biological evidence of a vectorized instructive signal in the brain, implemented via semi-independent computation in cortical dendrites, unveiling a potential mechanism for solving credit assignment in the brain.</p>","PeriodicalId":72407,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.03.565534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vectorization of teaching signals is a key element of virtually all modern machine learning algorithms, including backpropagation, target propagation and reinforcement learning. Vectorization allows a scalable and computationally efficient solution to the credit assignment problem by tailoring instructive signals to individual neurons. Recent theoretical models have suggested that neural circuits could implement single-phase vectorized learning at the cellular level by processing feedforward and feedback information streams in separate dendritic compartments1-5. This presents a compelling, but untested, hypothesis for how cortical circuits could solve credit assignment in the brain. We leveraged a neurofeedback brain-computer interface (BCI) task with an experimenter-defined reward function to test for vectorized instructive signals in dendrites. We trained mice to modulate the activity of two spatially intermingled populations (4 or 5 neurons each) of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the retrosplenial cortex to rotate a visual grating towards a target orientation while we recorded GCaMP activity from somas and corresponding distal apical dendrites. We observed that the relative magnitudes of somatic versus dendritic signals could be predicted using the activity of the surrounding network and contained information about task-related variables that could serve as instructive signals, including reward and error. The signs of these putative teaching signals both depended on the causal role of individual neurons in the task and predicted changes in overall activity over the course of learning. Furthermore, targeted optogenetic perturbation of these signals disrupted learning. These results provide the first biological evidence of a vectorized instructive signal in the brain, implemented via semi-independent computation in cortical dendrites, unveiling a potential mechanism for solving credit assignment in the brain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑机接口任务中皮质树突的矢量化指示信号。
误差反向传播是人工神经网络中应用最广泛的学习算法,是现代机器学习和人工智能的主干1,2。反向传播提供了一种解决信用分配问题的方法,通过向量化为单个神经元定制的错误信号。最近的理论模型表明,神经回路可以通过在不同的树突隔室中半独立地处理前馈和反馈信息流来实现类似反向传播的学习。这提出了一个令人信服但未经检验的假设,即大脑皮层回路如何解决大脑中的信用分配问题。我们设计了一个具有实验者定义的奖励函数的神经反馈脑机接口(BCI)任务,以评估树突实现类似反向传播的学习的关键要求。我们训练小鼠调节脾后皮层第5层锥体神经元的两个空间混合群体(每个群体4或5个神经元)的活动,使视觉光栅向目标方向旋转,同时我们记录了体细胞和相应的远端根尖树突的GCaMP活动。我们观察到体细胞和树突信号的相对大小可以通过周围网络的活动来预测,并包含有关任务相关变量的信息,这些变量可以作为指导性信号,包括奖励和错误。这些假定的教学信号的信号既取决于单个神经元在任务中的因果作用,也预测了学习过程中整体活动的变化。这些结果为大脑中信用分配问题的反向传播式解决方案提供了第一个生物学证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-supervised segmentation and characterization of fiber bundles in anatomic tracing data. Single neuron contributions to the auditory brainstem EEG. Neural substrates of cold nociception in Drosophila larva. Inversions Can Accumulate Balanced Sexual Antagonism: Evidence from Simulations and Drosophila Experiments. Programming megakaryocytes to produce engineered platelets for delivering non-native proteins.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1