Effect of opioid-free anesthesia on post-operative period in cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a propensity score matched study.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Acta Chirurgica Belgica Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1080/00015458.2023.2190289
Sylvain Liet, Mathilde Logeay, Emmanuel Besnier, Jean Selim, Gregory Wood, Jean-Jacques Tuech, Julien Coget, Vincent Compère, Emilie Occhiali, Benjamin Popoff, Thomas Clavier
{"title":"Effect of opioid-free anesthesia on post-operative period in cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a propensity score matched study.","authors":"Sylvain Liet, Mathilde Logeay, Emmanuel Besnier, Jean Selim, Gregory Wood, Jean-Jacques Tuech, Julien Coget, Vincent Compère, Emilie Occhiali, Benjamin Popoff, Thomas Clavier","doi":"10.1080/00015458.2023.2190289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pain after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is important. It appears essential to reduce postoperative pain and morphine consumption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study in a university hospital comparing patient benefiting from CRS-HIPEC under opioid-free anesthesia (OFA; dexmedetomidine) to those anesthetized with opioid anesthesia (OA; remifentanil) using a propensity score matching method. The main objective was the impact of OFA on postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24 h after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>102 patients were included, matching on the propensity score allowed selecting 34 unique pairs analyzed. Morphine consumption was lower in the OFA group than in the OA group (3.0 [0.00-11.0] mg/24 h <i>vs</i>. 13.0 [2.5-25.0] mg/24 h; <i>p</i> = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, OFA was associated with a reduction of 7.2 [0.5-13.9] mg of postoperative morphine (<i>p</i> = 0.04). The rate of renal failure with a KDIGO-score > 1 was lower in the OFA group than in the OA group (12% <i>vs</i>. 38%; <i>p</i> = 0.01). There was no difference between groups concerning length of surgery/anesthesia, norepinephrine infusion, volume of fluid therapy, post-operative complications, rehospitalization or ICU readmission within 90 days, mortality, and postoperative rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that OFA for CRS-HIPEC patients appears safe and is associated with less postoperative morphine use and acute kidney injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":6935,"journal":{"name":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":"81-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2023.2190289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is important. It appears essential to reduce postoperative pain and morphine consumption.

Methods: Retrospective study in a university hospital comparing patient benefiting from CRS-HIPEC under opioid-free anesthesia (OFA; dexmedetomidine) to those anesthetized with opioid anesthesia (OA; remifentanil) using a propensity score matching method. The main objective was the impact of OFA on postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24 h after surgery.

Results: 102 patients were included, matching on the propensity score allowed selecting 34 unique pairs analyzed. Morphine consumption was lower in the OFA group than in the OA group (3.0 [0.00-11.0] mg/24 h vs. 13.0 [2.5-25.0] mg/24 h; p = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, OFA was associated with a reduction of 7.2 [0.5-13.9] mg of postoperative morphine (p = 0.04). The rate of renal failure with a KDIGO-score > 1 was lower in the OFA group than in the OA group (12% vs. 38%; p = 0.01). There was no difference between groups concerning length of surgery/anesthesia, norepinephrine infusion, volume of fluid therapy, post-operative complications, rehospitalization or ICU readmission within 90 days, mortality, and postoperative rehabilitation.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that OFA for CRS-HIPEC patients appears safe and is associated with less postoperative morphine use and acute kidney injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无阿片类药物麻醉对腹腔内热化疗细胞减灭术术后时间的影响:倾向评分匹配研究。
背景:腹腔热化疗细胞切除手术(CRS-HIPEC)术后疼痛非常重要。减少术后疼痛和吗啡用量似乎至关重要:在一家大学医院进行的回顾性研究,采用倾向得分匹配法,比较了在无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA;右美托咪定)下接受 CRS-HIPEC 的患者与接受阿片类药物麻醉(OA;瑞芬太尼)的患者。主要目的是研究OFA对术后24小时内吗啡消耗量的影响:结果:共纳入 102 名患者,通过倾向得分匹配筛选出 34 对独特的患者进行分析。OFA组的吗啡消耗量低于OA组(3.0 [0.00-11.0] mg/24 h vs. 13.0 [2.5-25.0] mg/24 h; p = 0.02)。在多变量分析中,OFA 与术后吗啡量减少 7.2 [0.5-13.9] 毫克相关(p = 0.04)。OFA 组 KDIGO 评分大于 1 的肾衰竭发生率低于 OA 组(12% 对 38%;P = 0.01)。在手术/麻醉时间、去甲肾上腺素输注、液体治疗量、术后并发症、90天内再次住院或再次入住ICU、死亡率和术后康复方面,组间没有差异:我们的研究结果表明,CRS-HIPEC 患者的 OFA 似乎是安全的,而且术后吗啡用量和急性肾损伤较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Chirurgica Belgica
Acta Chirurgica Belgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Chirurgica Belgica (ACB) is the official journal of the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery (RBSS) and its affiliated societies. It publishes Editorials, Review papers, Original Research, and Technique related manuscripts in the broad field of Clinical Surgery.
期刊最新文献
In memoriam: Emeritus Professor Dr. Jacques Aimé Gruwez 24 March 1927-9 July 2024. Blood group is a long-term cardiovascular risk factor after carotid endarterectomy. Brain natriuretic peptide is a long-term cardiovascular predictor in carotid endarterectomy. Effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and bone mineral density in post menopausal women. Impact of risk factors on the incidence of tunneled dialysis catheter infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1