An examination of 3rd and 5th grade students' use of dialect specific forms during a written editing task

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Communication Disorders Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106303
Denisha Campbell, Carla Wood, Shannon Hall-Mills
{"title":"An examination of 3rd and 5th grade students' use of dialect specific forms during a written editing task","authors":"Denisha Campbell,&nbsp;Carla Wood,&nbsp;Shannon Hall-Mills","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The goal of the current study was to examine the role of variety and frequency of dialectal features in relation to General American English (GAE) editing ability. This study focused on speakers of dialect-specific forms and their ability to edit to GAE. To gain insight into this relation, the following research questions were posed: (1). How do third and fifth-grade students differ in the variety of features of dialect-specific forms they use, the frequency of their use, and their editing ability to GAE? (2). Is there a significant relation between dialect use and editing ability?</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants included 68 third and fifth-grade students who produced at least one dialect-specific form. We measured students’ ability to edit to GAE during a written editing task. Frequency and variety of dialect use were based on an oral language sample where students were asked to share their favorite game or sport.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifth-grade students are significantly better at editing written dialect specific forms to reflect GAE writing conventions as compared to third-grade students. However, there was not a significant difference in the dialect specific form usage between the two grades. Finally, there was not a significant relation between dialect specific form use and editing ability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results offer relevant clinical and educational implications for increasing cultural responsivity and promote the use of multiple measures across modalities to gain relevant information when assessing students who use dialect specific forms. Further, the results from this study provide further insights into how written editing ability exhibited through the awareness of GAE conventions improves with age despite the influence of dialect specific forms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 106303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992423000035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of the current study was to examine the role of variety and frequency of dialectal features in relation to General American English (GAE) editing ability. This study focused on speakers of dialect-specific forms and their ability to edit to GAE. To gain insight into this relation, the following research questions were posed: (1). How do third and fifth-grade students differ in the variety of features of dialect-specific forms they use, the frequency of their use, and their editing ability to GAE? (2). Is there a significant relation between dialect use and editing ability?

Methods

Participants included 68 third and fifth-grade students who produced at least one dialect-specific form. We measured students’ ability to edit to GAE during a written editing task. Frequency and variety of dialect use were based on an oral language sample where students were asked to share their favorite game or sport.

Results

Fifth-grade students are significantly better at editing written dialect specific forms to reflect GAE writing conventions as compared to third-grade students. However, there was not a significant difference in the dialect specific form usage between the two grades. Finally, there was not a significant relation between dialect specific form use and editing ability.

Conclusions

These results offer relevant clinical and educational implications for increasing cultural responsivity and promote the use of multiple measures across modalities to gain relevant information when assessing students who use dialect specific forms. Further, the results from this study provide further insights into how written editing ability exhibited through the awareness of GAE conventions improves with age despite the influence of dialect specific forms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三年级和五年级学生在书面编辑任务中使用方言特定形式的测试
目的本研究的目的是检验方言特征的多样性和频率与美国通用英语(GAE)编辑能力的关系。这项研究的重点是方言特定形式的说话者及其对GAE的编辑能力。为了深入了解这种关系,提出了以下研究问题:(1)。三年级和五年级的学生在使用方言特定形式的多样性、使用频率和对GAE的编辑能力方面有何不同?(2) 。方言使用与编辑能力之间是否存在显著关系?方法参与者包括68名三年级和五年级的学生,他们至少产生了一种方言特有的形式。我们在书面编辑任务中测量了学生对GAE的编辑能力。方言使用的频率和多样性基于口语样本,要求学生分享他们最喜欢的游戏或运动。结果与三年级学生相比,五年级学生在编辑特定方言的书面形式以反映GAE写作习惯方面明显更好。然而,两个年级在方言特定形式用法上没有显著差异。最后,方言特定形式的使用与编辑能力之间没有显著的关系。结论这些结果为提高文化反应性提供了相关的临床和教育意义,并促进在评估使用方言特定形式的学生时使用跨模式的多种测量方法来获得相关信息。此外,这项研究的结果进一步深入了解了尽管受到方言特定形式的影响,但通过对GAE惯例的认识所表现出的书面编辑能力是如何随着年龄的增长而提高的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Communication Disorders publishes original articles on topics related to disorders of speech, language and hearing. Authors are encouraged to submit reports of experimental or descriptive investigations (research articles), review articles, tutorials or discussion papers, or letters to the editor ("short communications"). Please note that we do not accept case studies unless they conform to the principles of single-subject experimental design. Special issues are published periodically on timely and clinically relevant topics.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic assessment of word learning as a predictor of response to vocabulary intervention Editorial Board Shifting from a female-dominated profession: The perceptions and experiences of male students in communication sciences and disorders Cognitive processing biases of social anxiety in adults who do and do not stutter Linguistic factors associated with stuttering-like disfluencies in Japanese preschool and school-aged children who stutter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1