Erectile Dysfunction after Conservative Treatment of Sacral Fractures in Males without Injury to the Urinary System.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1611-0165
Alkan Bayrak, Altug Duramaz
{"title":"Erectile Dysfunction after Conservative Treatment of Sacral Fractures in Males without Injury to the Urinary System.","authors":"Alkan Bayrak,&nbsp;Altug Duramaz","doi":"10.1055/a-1611-0165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to determine the incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED) reported by patients, and to define the prognostic relationship between ED and conservatively treated sacral fracture without urethral injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged between 20 - 50 years who were sexually active and had no known sexual dysfunction prior to the trauma were included in the study. Seventy-seven patients (47 married, 30 single) treated conservatively for sacral fracture between April 2012 and February 2017 were retrospectively screened. Patients were compared in terms of age, marital status, body mass index (BMI), trauma mechanism, additional system injury, functional outcomes, and complications. Functional outcomes were assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and the Majeed pelvic fracture functional assessment scale (MPS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference was observed between fracture types with respect to age, BMI, follow-up, marital status, trauma mechanism, and accompanying injury. The incidence of ED was 27.3% for those that received conservative treatment after sacrum fracture. The mean score of IIEF-5 was 18.6 ± 6.6 and MPS was 77.2 ± 13.2. There was no significant relationship between the injury type of the patients and the IIEF-5 and MPS scores (p = 0.593 and p = 0.907, respectively). The lowest IIEF-5 score was found in Denis type 2 fractures (p = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The frequency of ED was higher in Denis type 2 sacrum fractures. Sexual function should be questioned in the follow-up, especially in those fracture types.</p>","PeriodicalId":51219,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","volume":"161 2","pages":"154-159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1611-0165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine the incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED) reported by patients, and to define the prognostic relationship between ED and conservatively treated sacral fracture without urethral injury.

Methods: Patients aged between 20 - 50 years who were sexually active and had no known sexual dysfunction prior to the trauma were included in the study. Seventy-seven patients (47 married, 30 single) treated conservatively for sacral fracture between April 2012 and February 2017 were retrospectively screened. Patients were compared in terms of age, marital status, body mass index (BMI), trauma mechanism, additional system injury, functional outcomes, and complications. Functional outcomes were assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and the Majeed pelvic fracture functional assessment scale (MPS).

Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between fracture types with respect to age, BMI, follow-up, marital status, trauma mechanism, and accompanying injury. The incidence of ED was 27.3% for those that received conservative treatment after sacrum fracture. The mean score of IIEF-5 was 18.6 ± 6.6 and MPS was 77.2 ± 13.2. There was no significant relationship between the injury type of the patients and the IIEF-5 and MPS scores (p = 0.593 and p = 0.907, respectively). The lowest IIEF-5 score was found in Denis type 2 fractures (p = 0.020).

Conclusion: The frequency of ED was higher in Denis type 2 sacrum fractures. Sexual function should be questioned in the follow-up, especially in those fracture types.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无泌尿系统损伤的男性骶骨骨折保守治疗后勃起功能障碍。
背景:本研究旨在确定患者报告的勃起功能障碍(ED)的发生率,并确定ED与保守治疗的无尿道损伤的骶骨骨折的预后关系。方法:年龄在20 - 50岁之间,性活跃,创伤前无已知性功能障碍的患者纳入研究。回顾性筛选2012年4月至2017年2月期间保守治疗的骶骨骨折患者77例(已婚47例,单身30例)。比较患者的年龄、婚姻状况、体重指数(BMI)、创伤机制、附加系统损伤、功能结局和并发症。功能结局采用国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)和Majeed骨盆骨折功能评估量表(MPS)进行评估。结果:骨折类型在年龄、BMI、随访、婚姻状况、创伤机制、伴伤等方面均无统计学差异。骶骨骨折后保守治疗的ED发生率为27.3%。IIEF-5平均评分为18.6±6.6分,MPS平均评分为77.2±13.2分。患者损伤类型与IIEF-5、MPS评分无显著相关性(p = 0.593、p = 0.907)。Denis 2型骨折IIEF-5评分最低(p = 0.020)。结论:Denis 2型骶骨骨折中ED发生率较高。在随访中,性功能应受到质疑,特别是那些骨折类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Das Forum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aus einer Hand Aktuelles aus Klinik, Wissenschaft und Forschung Ein unabhängiges Peer-Review-Verfahren sichert Qualität, Relevanz und Plausibilität der Daten Modernes Layout: Klare Gliederung, farbige Abbildungen, strukturierte Tabellen Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aktuell: Berichte und Reportagen zu den wichtigsten Themen im Fach
期刊最新文献
Long-term Outcomes after Medial Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy - A Retrospective Study of 69 Patients. S2k Guideline for Tibial Plateau Fractures - Classification, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Long-term Outcomes in Orthogeriatric Co-management: a Literature Review. Non-drainage Offers Faster Proprioceptive and Functional Recovery, and More Clinical Benefits for Patients following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Drainage. Fractures in Childhood and Young Adulthood According to Maternal Smoking in Late Pregnancy. A Danish Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1