Multivariate Sequential Analytics for Cardiovascular Disease Event Prediction.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Methods of Information in Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-23 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1758687
William Hsu, Jim Warren, Patricia Riddle
{"title":"Multivariate Sequential Analytics for Cardiovascular Disease Event Prediction.","authors":"William Hsu, Jim Warren, Patricia Riddle","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1758687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Automated clinical decision support for risk assessment is a powerful tool in combating cardiovascular disease (CVD), enabling targeted early intervention that could avoid issues of overtreatment or undertreatment. However, current CVD risk prediction models use observations at baseline without explicitly representing patient history as a time series.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to examine whether by explicitly modelling the temporal dimension of patient history event prediction may be improved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigates methods for multivariate sequential modelling with a particular emphasis on long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks. Data from a CVD decision support tool is linked to routinely collected national datasets including pharmaceutical dispensing, hospitalization, laboratory test results, and deaths. The study uses a 2-year observation and a 5-year prediction window. Selected methods are applied to the linked dataset. The experiments performed focus on CVD event prediction. CVD death or hospitalization in a 5-year interval was predicted for patients with history of lipid-lowering therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the experiments showed temporal models are valuable for CVD event prediction over a 5-year interval. This is especially the case for LSTM, which produced the best predictive performance among all models compared achieving AUROC of 0.801 and average precision of 0.425. The non-temporal model comparator ridge classifier (RC) trained using all quarterly data or by aggregating quarterly data (averaging time-varying features) was highly competitive achieving AUROC of 0.799 and average precision of 0.420 and AUROC of 0.800 and average precision of 0.421, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence that the use of deep temporal models particularly LSTM in clinical decision support for chronic disease would be advantageous with LSTM significantly improving on commonly used regression models such as logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards on the task of CVD event prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":49822,"journal":{"name":"Methods of Information in Medicine","volume":"61 S 02","pages":"e149-e171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/af/00/10-1055-s-0042-1758687.PMC9788915.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods of Information in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Automated clinical decision support for risk assessment is a powerful tool in combating cardiovascular disease (CVD), enabling targeted early intervention that could avoid issues of overtreatment or undertreatment. However, current CVD risk prediction models use observations at baseline without explicitly representing patient history as a time series.

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine whether by explicitly modelling the temporal dimension of patient history event prediction may be improved.

Methods: This study investigates methods for multivariate sequential modelling with a particular emphasis on long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks. Data from a CVD decision support tool is linked to routinely collected national datasets including pharmaceutical dispensing, hospitalization, laboratory test results, and deaths. The study uses a 2-year observation and a 5-year prediction window. Selected methods are applied to the linked dataset. The experiments performed focus on CVD event prediction. CVD death or hospitalization in a 5-year interval was predicted for patients with history of lipid-lowering therapy.

Results: The results of the experiments showed temporal models are valuable for CVD event prediction over a 5-year interval. This is especially the case for LSTM, which produced the best predictive performance among all models compared achieving AUROC of 0.801 and average precision of 0.425. The non-temporal model comparator ridge classifier (RC) trained using all quarterly data or by aggregating quarterly data (averaging time-varying features) was highly competitive achieving AUROC of 0.799 and average precision of 0.420 and AUROC of 0.800 and average precision of 0.421, respectively.

Conclusion: This study provides evidence that the use of deep temporal models particularly LSTM in clinical decision support for chronic disease would be advantageous with LSTM significantly improving on commonly used regression models such as logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards on the task of CVD event prediction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于心血管疾病事件预测的多变量序列分析。
背景:风险评估的自动化临床决策支持是防治心血管疾病(CVD)的有力工具,可实现有针对性的早期干预,避免过度治疗或治疗不当的问题。然而,目前的心血管疾病风险预测模型使用的是基线观测数据,没有将患者病史明确表示为时间序列:本研究旨在探讨是否可以通过明确模拟患者病史的时间维度来改进事件预测:本研究探讨了多变量序列建模方法,并特别强调了长短期记忆(LSTM)递归神经网络。来自心血管疾病决策支持工具的数据与常规收集的国家数据集(包括配药、住院、实验室检测结果和死亡)相连接。研究使用了 2 年观察期和 5 年预测期。选定的方法被应用于链接数据集。实验重点是心血管疾病事件预测。对有降脂治疗史的患者进行了 5 年间隔期内心血管疾病死亡或住院预测:实验结果表明,时间模型对于预测 5 年间的心血管疾病事件很有价值。在所有比较模型中,LSTM 的预测性能最佳,AUROC 为 0.801,平均精度为 0.425。使用所有季度数据或通过聚合季度数据(平均时变特征)训练的非时态模型比较模型脊分类器(RC)具有很强的竞争力,AUROC 为 0.799,平均精度为 0.420;AUROC 为 0.800,平均精度为 0.421:这项研究证明,在慢性病临床决策支持中使用深度时空模型,尤其是 LSTM,将具有优势,在心血管疾病事件预测任务中,LSTM 明显优于逻辑回归和 Cox 比例危险等常用回归模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Methods of Information in Medicine
Methods of Information in Medicine 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Good medicine and good healthcare demand good information. Since the journal''s founding in 1962, Methods of Information in Medicine has stressed the methodology and scientific fundamentals of organizing, representing and analyzing data, information and knowledge in biomedicine and health care. Covering publications in the fields of biomedical and health informatics, medical biometry, and epidemiology, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, reports, opinion papers, editorials, and letters to the editor. From time to time, the journal publishes articles on particular focus themes as part of a journal''s issue.
期刊最新文献
Harnessing Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for Microscopic Vessel Segmentation in Pulmonary Fibrosis Using Novel Hierarchical Phase-Contrast Tomography (HiP-CT) Images. Deciphering Abbreviations in Malaysian Clinical Notes Using Machine Learning. The Significance of Information Quality for the Secondary Use of the Information in the National Health Care Quality Registers in Finland. Leveraging Guideline-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems with Large Language Models: A Case Study with Breast Cancer. Cross-lingual Natural Language Processing on Limited Annotated Case/Radiology Reports in English and Japanese: Insights from the Real-MedNLP Workshop.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1