Gender Inclusion and Fit in STEM.

IF 23.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Annual review of psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-18 DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-032720-043052
Toni Schmader
{"title":"Gender Inclusion and Fit in STEM.","authors":"Toni Schmader","doi":"10.1146/annurev-psych-032720-043052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite progress made toward increasing women's interest and involvement in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), women continue to be underrepresented and experience less equity and inclusion in some STEM fields. In this article, I review the psychological literature relevant to understanding and mitigating women's lower fit and inclusion in STEM. Person-level explanations concerning women's abilities, interests, and self-efficacy are insufficient for explaining these persistent gaps. Rather, women's relatively lower interest in male-dominated STEM careers such as computer science and engineering is likely to be constrained by gender stereotypes. These gender stereotypes erode women's ability to experience self-concept fit, goal fit, and/or social fit. Such effects occur independently of intentional interpersonal biases and discrimination, and yet they create systemic barriers to women's attraction to, integration in, and advancement in STEM. Dismantling these systemic barriers requires a multifaceted approach to changing organizational and educational cultures at the institutional, interpersonal, and individual level.</p>","PeriodicalId":8010,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of psychology","volume":"74 ","pages":"219-243"},"PeriodicalIF":23.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032720-043052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Despite progress made toward increasing women's interest and involvement in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), women continue to be underrepresented and experience less equity and inclusion in some STEM fields. In this article, I review the psychological literature relevant to understanding and mitigating women's lower fit and inclusion in STEM. Person-level explanations concerning women's abilities, interests, and self-efficacy are insufficient for explaining these persistent gaps. Rather, women's relatively lower interest in male-dominated STEM careers such as computer science and engineering is likely to be constrained by gender stereotypes. These gender stereotypes erode women's ability to experience self-concept fit, goal fit, and/or social fit. Such effects occur independently of intentional interpersonal biases and discrimination, and yet they create systemic barriers to women's attraction to, integration in, and advancement in STEM. Dismantling these systemic barriers requires a multifaceted approach to changing organizational and educational cultures at the institutional, interpersonal, and individual level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STEM中的性别包容与契合。
尽管在提高女性对科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)的兴趣和参与方面取得了进展,但在一些STEM领域,女性的代表性仍然不足,她们的平等和包容程度也较低。在这篇文章中,我回顾了与理解和减轻女性在STEM中的低适应和包容相关的心理学文献。关于女性能力、兴趣和自我效能的个人层面解释不足以解释这些持续存在的差距。相反,女性对计算机科学和工程等男性主导的STEM职业的兴趣相对较低,这可能受到性别刻板印象的限制。这些性别刻板印象削弱了女性体验自我概念契合、目标契合和/或社会契合的能力。这种影响与有意的人际偏见和歧视无关,但它们却对女性在STEM领域的吸引力、融入和进步造成了系统性障碍。消除这些系统障碍需要在制度、人际关系和个人层面上采取多方面的方法来改变组织和教育文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annual review of psychology
Annual review of psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
47.30
自引率
0.80%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Psychology, a publication that has been available since 1950, provides comprehensive coverage of the latest advancements in psychological research. It encompasses a wide range of topics, including the biological underpinnings of human behavior, the intricacies of our senses and perception, the functioning of the mind, animal behavior and learning, human development, psychopathology, clinical and counseling psychology, social psychology, personality, environmental psychology, community psychology, and much more. In a recent development, the current volume of this esteemed journal has transitioned from a subscription-based model to an open access format as part of the Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open initiative. As a result, all articles published in this volume are now freely accessible to the public under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
期刊最新文献
Ideology: Psychological Similarities and Differences Across the Ideological Spectrum Reexamined. Gender Identity and Aggression. Possible Worlds Theory: How the Imagination Transcends and Recreates Reality. Racial Socialization in the United States. The Circadian Brain and Cognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1