[Long-term Results after Endovascular and Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - a Propensity Score Matched Analysis].

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-28 DOI:10.1055/a-2044-0780
Yuliya Svidlova, Jasmin Epple, Neelam Lingwal, Thomas Schmitz-Rixen, Dittmar Böckler, Reinhart T Grundmann
{"title":"[Long-term Results after Endovascular and Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - a Propensity Score Matched Analysis].","authors":"Yuliya Svidlova, Jasmin Epple, Neelam Lingwal, Thomas Schmitz-Rixen, Dittmar Böckler, Reinhart T Grundmann","doi":"10.1055/a-2044-0780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This retrospective propensity score matched study presents the perioperative mortality and long-term survival up to 9 years after endovascular (EVAR) and open (OAR) repair of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) in Germany using health insurance data.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>2170 patients treated between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2016, for rAAA within 24 hours of hospital admission and receiving blood transfusions were enrolled in the study and tracked until December 31st, 2018. For better comparability of EVAR and OAR, a 1:1 propensity score matching with 624 pairs according to patient age, sex and comorbidities was carried out using the R program (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the unadjusted groups, 29.1% (631/2170) of the patients were treated with EVAR and 70.9% (1539/2170) with OAR. EVAR patients had a significantly higher overall rate of comorbidities. After adjustment, EVAR patients showed significantly better perioperative survival (EVAR 35.7%, OAR 51.0%, p = 0.000). Perioperative complications occurred in 80.4% of EVAR patients and 80.3% of OAR patients (p = 1.000). At the end of follow-up, Kaplan-Meier estimated that 15.2% of patients survived after EVAR vs. 19.5% after OAR (p = 0.027). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, OAR, age ≥ 80 years, diabetes mellitus type 2 and renal failure stages 3 to 5 had a negative impact on overall survival. Patients treated on weekdays had a significantly lower perioperative mortality than patients treated during the weekend (perioperative mortality on weekdays 40.6% vs. 53.4% during the weekend; p = 0.000) and a better overall survival as estimated by Kaplan-Meier.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significantly better perioperative and overall survival was observed with EVAR than with OAR in patients with rAAA. The perioperative survival benefit of EVAR was also found in patients older than 80 years. Female gender had no significant influence on perioperative mortality and overall survival. Patients treated on weekends had a significantly poorer perioperative survival than patients treated on weekdays, and this lasted through the end of follow-up. The extent to which this was dependent on hospital structure was unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":23956,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2044-0780","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This retrospective propensity score matched study presents the perioperative mortality and long-term survival up to 9 years after endovascular (EVAR) and open (OAR) repair of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) in Germany using health insurance data.

Materials and methods: 2170 patients treated between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2016, for rAAA within 24 hours of hospital admission and receiving blood transfusions were enrolled in the study and tracked until December 31st, 2018. For better comparability of EVAR and OAR, a 1:1 propensity score matching with 624 pairs according to patient age, sex and comorbidities was carried out using the R program (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results: In the unadjusted groups, 29.1% (631/2170) of the patients were treated with EVAR and 70.9% (1539/2170) with OAR. EVAR patients had a significantly higher overall rate of comorbidities. After adjustment, EVAR patients showed significantly better perioperative survival (EVAR 35.7%, OAR 51.0%, p = 0.000). Perioperative complications occurred in 80.4% of EVAR patients and 80.3% of OAR patients (p = 1.000). At the end of follow-up, Kaplan-Meier estimated that 15.2% of patients survived after EVAR vs. 19.5% after OAR (p = 0.027). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, OAR, age ≥ 80 years, diabetes mellitus type 2 and renal failure stages 3 to 5 had a negative impact on overall survival. Patients treated on weekdays had a significantly lower perioperative mortality than patients treated during the weekend (perioperative mortality on weekdays 40.6% vs. 53.4% during the weekend; p = 0.000) and a better overall survival as estimated by Kaplan-Meier.

Conclusion: Significantly better perioperative and overall survival was observed with EVAR than with OAR in patients with rAAA. The perioperative survival benefit of EVAR was also found in patients older than 80 years. Female gender had no significant influence on perioperative mortality and overall survival. Patients treated on weekends had a significantly poorer perioperative survival than patients treated on weekdays, and this lasted through the end of follow-up. The extent to which this was dependent on hospital structure was unclear.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[腹主动脉瘤破裂的血管内修复术和开放式修复术后的长期效果 - 倾向性评分匹配分析]。
背景:这项回顾性倾向得分匹配研究利用医疗保险数据,对德国腹主动脉瘤破裂(rAAA)患者进行血管内(EVAR)和开放(OAR)修复术后9年的围手术期死亡率和长期存活率进行了研究。材料与方法:2010年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间,2170名入院24小时内接受治疗并接受输血的rAAA患者被纳入研究,并追踪至2018年12月31日。为了更好地比较EVAR和OAR,研究人员使用R程序(奥地利维也纳统计计算基金会)根据患者年龄、性别和合并症对624对患者进行了1:1倾向得分匹配:在未调整组中,29.1%(631/2170)的患者接受了EVAR治疗,70.9%(1539/2170)的患者接受了OAR治疗。EVAR患者的合并症总发生率明显更高。经调整后,EVAR 患者的围手术期存活率明显更高(EVAR 35.7%, OAR 51.0%, p = 0.000)。80.4%的EVAR患者和80.3%的OAR患者出现围手术期并发症(P = 1.000)。在随访结束时,Kaplan-Meier估计EVAR术后有15.2%的患者存活,而OAR术后有19.5%的患者存活(p = 0.027)。在多变量考克斯回归分析中,OAR、年龄≥80岁、2型糖尿病和肾衰竭3至5期对总生存率有负面影响。平日接受治疗的患者围手术期死亡率明显低于周末接受治疗的患者(平日围手术期死亡率为40.6%,周末为53.4%;P = 0.000),根据Kaplan-Meier估计,患者的总生存率更高:结论:在rAAA患者中,EVAR的围手术期生存率和总生存率明显高于OAR。在 80 岁以上的患者中也发现了 EVAR 的围手术期生存率优势。女性性别对围手术期死亡率和总生存率没有明显影响。周末接受治疗的患者围手术期存活率明显低于平日接受治疗的患者,这种情况一直持续到随访结束。这种情况在多大程度上取决于医院结构尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Forschung und Praxis Das Zentralblatt für Chirurgie – alle Neuigkeiten aus der Allgemeinen, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie.
期刊最新文献
[Impact of Outpatient Care and Hybrid DRG - Impact on Hospitals]. Patients with Pulmonary Artery Reconstruction or Double Sleeve Resection Show Inferior Survival than Patients with Bronchial Sleeve Resection for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. [Correction: Long-term Results after Endovascular and Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - a Propensity Score Matched Analysis]. [Long-term Results after Endovascular and Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - a Propensity Score Matched Analysis]. [Diagnosis and Management of Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia after Elective Aortic Aneurysm Surgery].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1